Reviews

Neuromancer by William Gibson

in_my_mind's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional medium-paced

3.75

marzell's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

re_saxy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

lentzar's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.5

megbroache's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark fast-paced

3.0

alixelix's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Although I had never really delved into the genre, I’d always felt that when I eventually did get around to it, me and cyberpunk would come together like peanut butter and jelly. The entire genre seemed made for me, and it’s only because I insist on reading everything that crosses my path that I’d never really got around to reading any of the cyberpunk classics. I put Neuromancer on this year’s reading list to make myself finally take the time to read something that I thought could really resonate with me.

I may have set myself up for a fall, placing Neuromancer on such a high pedestal. That’s not to say I didn’t enjoy it, I did. I just should have read it a decade ago.

When you open the book you’re immediately thrown into the world. There’s no information dump, it’s sink or swim. It took me a while to get my bearings and I think I lost a bit along the way. I’ll have to reread it again in a year or so. That way I’ll be coming in already warmed up and I’ll be able to take in a lot more of the scenery.

The descriptive passages of what it’s like in the Matrix are so alien, that I feel like I only scratched the surface with the initial reading. It will take multiple reads to actually feel like it’s a landscape that I can picture. Part of the problem may be that I kept trying to interpret it through a modern technological lens of how we currently view data structures and networks and the general idea of cyberspace. I had trouble letting go of my existing preconceptions and I kept trying to relate it back to other points of reference, like Tron or The Matrix. You need to take away those preconceptions and read it on its own merit. I didn’t do that, and I hope I’ll be able to do so upon rereading it.

I struggle to relate to most female characters, and although I initially didn’t like Molly, she grew on me. At first, I thought she was just going to be there for a bit of titillation, but she turned out to be her own independent character. I find that too often as soon as you put a strong female character into a relationship they become submissive and their ability to make rational decisions goes out the window in favour of their new boyfriend. This wasn’t the case with Molly and I appreciated that. It’s hard to make a character tough and formidable but also retain their femininity without straight up throwing their sexuality in your face. I’m not saying Molly achieved all of that, but she hit a few marks and was a decent female character when she could have easily have been a one-dimensional cardboard cut out in tight pants with a lot of cleavage.

I think the struggles I had with this novel were all bourne of my own limitations and preconceptions coming into it. Even though I feel like I need to reread again, it was still a gripping story. The events and the characters drove the story on through landscapes I couldn’t always get my head around, but they were strong enough that it didn’t matter.

stephlq's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

jordanrc's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No

5.0

Instant favorite. 

merfy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

4.75

apathetic_teapot's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Interesting book with some themes that seem ahead of their time considering when it was written.