Reviews tagging 'Schizophrenia/Psychosis '

The God of the Woods by Liz Moore

33 reviews

mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

This is how a thriller should be written! I loved the plot and how neatly the loose ends were wrapped up.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

I would have rated this book higher if it hadn't been for the ending!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

The God of the Woods was a disappointment. While it had me gripped at many junctions, with many possible avenues all equally fascinating to explore, the actual resolution was less than satisfactory. Maybe I’m just a bit of a cynic, but I found the ending (with Barbara living alone on an island) kind of stupid. I also really didn’t like that all of the little threads were tied up—I wouldn’t have lost any sleep over Scary Mary. Ultimately, the book, while interesting, was a bit of a flop. I’ve thought, in the few days since finishing it, more about how I wish it had been better than about the things I’d originally liked about it—the spooky New England setting, the impact of class divisions, Alice. Everything good was forgotten in just how mediocre it all ended up. Perhaps if there had been fewer characters, I would have enjoyed it more. The sheer number of irrelevant backstories weighed down the narrative.
Despite my love of (tasteful) true crime and obsession with all things gothic or otherwise mysterious, I’m starting to think that I just don’t like mysteries—or to be more accurate, mystery-thrillers. Or to be even more accurate, I don’t like popular mystery-thrillers. Or some unpopular ones. Or I’m just very picky, as it turns out. This book reminded me of a terrible amalgamation of many of the other books I’ve read of a similar genre: namely, Little Darlings by Melanie Golding (hated this one), Black Chuck by Regan McDonell (really liked this one), Penpal by Dathan Auerbach (meh), Sadie by Courtney Summers (it was good!), Alias Grace by Margaret Atwood (I love this book!), and A Divided Mind by M. Billiter (haven’t been bothered to finish it for almost 3 years now).
The God of the Woods by Liz Moore felt like it had the setting of Penpal with some Sadie thrown in for good measure, maybe a hint of Black Chuck, populated with some Sadie and Black Chuck teenagers and A Divided Mind and Little Darlings adults. The conclusion—down to a swim in a large body of water—felt like war flashbacks from Little Darlings. By the end, I felt like I’d already read it before, in better (and infinitely worse) versions. While the latter 20thcentury setting was unique in comparison to all of these, it was hardly relevant to the actual plot, other than the presence of a prison escapee (very 1970s of Moore). It lacked the distinctive features of the mysteries I have liked, like the eeriness and uncertainty of Alias Grace.
From reading this book, I have realized that, while it is good to stick to genre conventions for marketing purposes, they should not be included at the expense of the narrative. What made Alias Grace so amazing to me wasn’t its vintage setting, nonlinear timeline, or unconventional female protagonists—it was the depth of the small cast of characters, the little mysteries that were never resolved, the unmatched beauty of the prose, and the tight plot—all things that The God of the Woods lacked.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous dark emotional mysterious sad fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark emotional mysterious reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Was it “good”? Yes. Did it feel like forever to get through? Also yes. Well written, but slow. I was prepared for multiple POVs and timeline jumps, but phew! While at times it felt like a chore to get through, I’m glad I did because the ending wrapped everything in a neat little bow and felt rewarding.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

I’m not entirely sure why or how this book has won awards like Goodreads choice award - if anything, it should have won an award for being the most mediocre mystery novel I’ve read to date. There’s no other way for me to describe this story other than just plain messy. It isn’t mystery, it isn’t crime, it isn’t thriller, it isn’t literary fiction. It’s all of these genres hastily slapped together with eight narrators and a timeline of nearly fifteen years. There’s not a single character that has a shred of dimension, interest, or engagement. The men are rich, powerful, abusive, and addictive, or just bland. The women are spineless, frail, and hopelessly dependent upon men even as they bring about nothing but their downfall. The investigators are just cartoon sketches of your typical cops - a characterization lifted on any number of book or television cop dramas. 

There’s so much going on in this book that it eventually becomes dry, noisy, and cantankerous. I figured out what happened to both children by about half way into the novel - and endured the mind numbing timeline jumps and character narrations. Along the way, we get this slip shot attempt to make a commentary on the lives of the rich and powerful families of upstate New York, rights to hereditary land (which I thought would be a discussion about stealing native land, and yet it was not), and how the rich stay rich and are corrupt to to their core. I don’t need a book to tell me that, especially in this patchwork quilt of drama. 

I really ought to take this book as my sign to not read any more book recommendations I get from social media - I’m always left a little worse for wear after reading them. The only reason I gave this book 3 stars was because in spite of this novel being abominably dry, I was still engaged enough to have to think about the answers to the crimes in this book - albeit it took me half of the novel to figure it out, but hey, it was entertaining while it lasted. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: N/A
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous dark emotional hopeful mysterious fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

4.25-4.5 / 5.0 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️💫 —— The God of the Woods weaves together a fascinating mix of:
• Gone Girl-style regionalism/pacing (minus, thankfully, the depths of sadism),
• Baby Sitters’ Club Mystery girl-power nostalgia (leveled up for their original fans now grown),
• Thoreau references to appreciate & chuckle at, and
• multi-decade elite entourages & class commentary à la The Great Gatsby’s Buchanans.

In The God of the Woods, Liz Moore cinematically carries out a solid, multi-perspective, multi-timeline organizational style. Character development balances intentional voice-building with ownership of its clichés. The God of the Woods also nicely works to subvert expectations of the semi-thriller/mystery genre while intuitively exploring generational submission vs. empowerment, as well as issues of patriarchy vs. matriarchy, legacy, classism, mental health, instinct, and closure. I found at least 90% page-turning and worth 4.5+ stars — but at times longed for the author to take more chances or make things messier even more.

Are all of the characters likable? At times, all them I detest; other times, all of them, I appreciate in their own way. All of them earn their keep. As I read, I chuckled often to think to one GoodReads review noting so much dislike for the characters that they declared “Let her be lost; let all of them be lost, actually” (@brend). In answer to that review, I sense this aggravation was intentionally part of Moore’s goal: to generate in us Gatsby-level disgust for the whole lot, yet  challenge is to preserve their humanity, too.

All in all, I found this to be an engaging, mostly-satisfying read. It was also the first time my library surprised me a rare “skip-the-line loan” of an e-book, so cool!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings