Reviews

Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes

tsenteme's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Κατ’ αρχάς μια πολύ ωραία και προσεγμένη έκδοση. Είναι το έργο ζωής του Thomas Hobbes, άγγλου φιλόσοφου, γιου προτεστάντη κληρικού, που έζησε τον 17ο αιώνα.

Μέρος πρώτο: περί ανθρώπου. Εξαιρετικό.

Μέρος δεύτερο: περί πολιτικής κοινότητας. Αναπτύσσει την βασική του πολιτική φιλοσοφία, βέβαια θεωρώ πως είναι ξεπερασμένη σήμερα.

Έως εδώ καλά!

Μέρος τρίτο & τέταρτο: περί χριστιανικής πολιτικής κοινότητας και βασιλείου του σκότους. Δηλαδή περί θαυμάτων, περί της σημασίας του λόγου των προφητών, περί του σκότους που προέρχεται από κενή φιλοσοφία και ποιοι το καρπώνονται και άλλα τέτοια κουλά. Εν ολίγοις μου προκάλεσε απογοήτευση και διάβασα μόνο τους τίτλους.

paskeh's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

ایده کلی جذاب، حداقل نیمی از کتاب مطلقا بیهوده

tarskipriest's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark informative medium-paced

5.0

janajlw's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny informative inspiring mysterious reflective tense slow-paced

3.75

rachelmatsuoka's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Leviathan is vastly interesting for Hobbes' description of the state of nature, humanity, society, and a government's purpose.

foucold's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

3.5/5

breadandmushrooms's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced

2.5

zmb's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I entirely disagree with Hobbes's political philosophy (of near absolute slavery of subjects to an absolute monarchy, er, whatever sovereignty you live under, but really monarchy) and I find his religious musings mostly irrelevant (although I enjoy his early appeals to reason against Christianity).

However, Hobbes is obviously hugely influential, and, very surprising to me, rather humanitarian. It's clear that he derived his political philosophy after living through a state traumatized by civil war and very much at risk of slipping back into it. An all powerful state is maybe not a great solution, but it's a solution that _keeps the peace_ and that is the most important thing a state can do.

I disagree with his conclusion almost entirely but the train of thought and experiences that led to it are quite clear, rational, and well-argued.

kokod's review against another edition

Go to review page

DNF. What proselytizing bullpoop