Scan barcode
gingerwife's review
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
2.5
Graphic: Emotional abuse, Death, Misogyny, Child abuse, Sexual assault, Cursing, Gaslighting, Physical abuse, Death of parent, Rape, and Sexual harassment
ashlynnt98's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
Graphic: Rape, Sexual content, and Gaslighting
tired_cicada's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
The plot has potential, I’ll try out book two and see if there is any pay off. The plot twist in this was laughably obvious. Like it was actually painful y’all.
Furthermore why is EVERYONE so weird and possessive? about the fmc’s body, her knowledge, everything. Everybody wants to keep this girl in a cage!
Was this great? Nah. Was it entertaining enough? Yeah.
Had nice line writing, and had the possibility for some fun world building if it goes that direction.
Graphic: Death, Physical abuse, Toxic relationship, Child abuse, Sexual content, Blood, Gaslighting, Sexual harassment, Classism, Adult/minor relationship, Death of parent, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Stalking, and Suicidal thoughts
nesta98's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? N/A
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Sexism, Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Cursing, Sexual assault, Toxic relationship, Misogyny, Emotional abuse, Death of parent, Violence, Gaslighting, Sexual content, and Murder
Minor: Adult/minor relationship
bekkz27's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.0
I haven't been this angry about a book for a long time. This book is a sad impression of the most popular books like ACOTAR or FBAA. TikTok needs to get their heads out of the dumpsters because that is exactly where this book emerged.
List of Transgressions:
1) Female Main Character = Mary Sue
She started this entire book as a really interesting character. Struggling through a very real grooming situation, she starts as a strong woman that refuses to take shit. Enter in a hot man. Just like that, she becomes a mewling idiot. Every bit of gumption and strength became a thing of the past as she turned into a doe-eyed schoolgirl in love with the first hottie to show her basic human kindness. *gag* The author attempts to hold onto the strong Estrella that shows up in the first 5 chapters by having her fight random people. It seems so out of context when you think about her upbringing in a very strict town. The logic is not logical here.
That isn't even bringing into account the blind way she refuses to use her brain throughout. There are COUNTLESS situations that made me question Caelum. Why does she never question this man who shows up and does things that are a tad too perfect? He is magically super good with a sword. How is that? He refuses to talk about his family or his past. Why does she just accept that? He is instantly in love with her. Why? He knows nothing about her and yet, he is ready to take her to bed the minute they meet. That seems fishy. What do you think Estrella? Nope. Perfectly logic. Even other characters bring up his bad behavior and she refuses to look at the FACTS presented to her. I hate this trope of a woman becoming a damn idiot because they found a man. She is a cookie-cutter Female Main Character who has no traits outside of being a love interest the instant Caelum arrives.
2) The Writing Style
I understand that Harper Woods is trying to reach out to the "common folk" here with her writing, but the offhandish way that common curse words are thrown into this book is jarring. The restrictive life and village that Estrella is raised in would not give her the vocabulary that is used. Also, pussy? She is too embarrassed to undress in front of people. Why would she use that word to describe herself? It doesn't fit the background set out for the character.
Let's talk about Caelum's nicknames for Estrella. "My star" passes the vibe check on this one because it speaks to an understanding of the true meaning of that name. I am a huge fan of nicknames. However, "little one" is a huge ick. He calls her it during sex and more than her actual name. That is not cute or sexy. It is the nickname for a child. I understand she is LIKE a child in her understanding of the world, but that does not make the nickname okay. It is really gross.
3) Sex
This book uses sex when the author doesn't know what else to do. When stuck on what should happen next, sexual tension or sex in general is the only answer. I also hate that Caelum uses sex to avoid answering questions that Estrella asks him. Plus, the sex scene in the public bath cheapened the relationship. Estrella WAS a quiet and reserved girl due to her upbringing. I respected that. However, Caelum goes from not wanting a single man to even seeing her slightly naked or touching her to railing her in the public bath to make a statement. Gross and not necessary.
4) (The biggest issue!) Caelum
Walking red flag alert. Nothing about this guy screams sexy love interest. He spends the majority of the book being overly protective and possessive. She is a person, not a horse. Through his constant gaslighting and avoidance, I felt like the author was trying to force the reader to think he was a good person. NOPE! He does nothing but objectify the main character and tell her how he will have sex with her. He constantly talks about how she will be begging him to fuck her and pretends it is romantic. RED FLAG! He gaslights the main character into trusting him while he lies to her the entire time. Whenever others beg Estrella to question what she is being presented about him, he gets violent. Um, not sexy. That is abusive behavior. I understand that Estrella's love map is super messed up because she was groomed as a child, but this is something else. She happily skips into an abusive relationship with Caelum and thinks it is true love. Ew. I cannot say enough about how Caelum is this unrealistic guy. Slong is so long it hits his knees and apparently, he is tall enough for Estrella to comfortably rest her head against his stomach while they are both standing. Who is Caelum? Slenderman!? UNREALISTIC!
Graphic: Pedophilia, Misogyny, Gaslighting, Sexual assault, Blood, Emotional abuse, Violence, Child abuse, Sexual violence, and Toxic relationship
milliethekitt's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.0
Graphic: Infidelity, Rape, Sexual assault, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Gaslighting, Incest, and Physical abuse
elleclair's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
THE WRITING
In terms of format, I’m not a HUGE stickler when it comes to grammar or overall writing quality. Sometimes the best stories are wrapped up in the most chaotic packages. But this book had so many repetitive words phrases and poorly described actions that I just couldn’t keep myself immersed. It felt lazy and/or unedited. I was really interested in the story though, so I switched to the audiobook in hopes that I’d notice these things less.
PLOT & ROMANCE
When it comes to the actual content of the book, the plot and worldbuilding were really interesting. They kept me constantly wondering what would happen next. Unfortunately, the story predominantly centers around the main romance, and that part was BAD. Maybe it’s something that others could get into, but it made me physically uncomfortable in many parts.
It’s important to note that our main character (MC) comes from a religious purity culture that judges the value of a woman based on her virginity / sexual purity, her ability to please her husband, and whether or not she’s putting out children. There’s heavy emphasis on the fact that women here do not have a choice and are used and mistreated by the men around them all their lives. Not only that, but there’s also a focus on the abuse of the lower class in general. So you would think that the point of this would be to drive the MC down a path where she finds freedom and perhaps a love interest who opposes all of these things. Nope.
I should start by saying, the love interest calls the MC “Little One” right off the bat, which already threw me off. I’m well versed in kink and the concept of DD/lg, but this wasn’t written like that at all. To me, the context made it creepy and predatory, especially when he insists on using the name during intensely graphic sex scenes - some of which included very dubious consent. I get that this is supposed to be about their size difference, but it didn’t read that way, and there was never any discussion between them to prove otherwise. And some information we get much later makes this point even creepier.
The consent issues maybe could’ve bothered me less than they did. I’ve read much darker smut and been absolutely fine. But when you put a character through an intensely emotional journey revolving around their lack of consent and ability to choose anything for themself, then stick them in a sexual situation where they’re thinking “I’m uncomfortable. I don’t think I want this” and have the love interest ignoring her cues saying “I told you what would happen, now spread your legs” — that’s problematic. Especially when the language used to describe his actions emphasizes that his grip was bruising, he wasn’t gentle, he didn’t ease her into it and tore her open, etc, and then has him say that he’s going to claim his pleasure from her again later that night. And this isn’t just one scene. This undercurrent of pressuring her into doing what he wants is present in every aspect of their relationship - including pressuring her into telling him that she loves him before she’s ready.
And if all that wasn’t an issue, these two have no chemistry. There’s no sense of love or genuine care for one another. Any time the MC talks about his affection or her feelings for him, it’s always in the context of simply having never had that thing before. The sex is good because she was never allowed to have it freely before. The cuddling is nice because she’d never been able to lay next to someone like that before. There were no redeeming qualities to this man, even through her eyes - apart from his determination to protect her from harm at all costs.
Now, I get that the point of some of this is that it’s supposed to lead up to him not being such a great guy. We’re supposed to be conflicted and want the MC to fight back and learn how to set boundaries. We’re supposed to feel like things don’t add up and grow to be scared of the love interest. But it doesn’t seem like this is a situation where she’s going to eventually leave him and end up with someone else. Right now, it definitely seems like he’s it. So, I guess to me the biggest dealbreaker of all here is… if you really want to write a compelling bad guy / love interest who’d destroy all but the woman he loves, that bad guy can’t aggressively embody the very thing that the MC is trying to escape. He needs to represent, in some part, what we want the MC to work towards, and there needs to be real, palpable chemistry between them. The love interest in this book is toxic and rapey, and I was incredibly disappointed when I found out that this wasn’t because we were building up to her leaving him.
Anyway, if none of this is an issue to you, you might really like the book. There are a lot of redeeming qualities in terms of the worldbuilding and pacing. For me personally, it was just hard to notice those things as much when I was busy gritting my teeth through all of the other parts LOL
Graphic: Toxic relationship, Death, Child abuse, Death of parent, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Gaslighting, Gore, Grief, Misogyny, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Infidelity, Injury/Injury detail, Murder, Rape, Sexism, Classism, Cursing, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide attempt, Violence, and Torture
Moderate: Blood, Terminal illness, and Bullying
Minor: Incest
beckyyreadss's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Graphic: Sexual content, Violence, and Sexual harassment
Moderate: Sexism, Murder, Gaslighting, Toxic relationship, War, Sexual assault, and Suicide
ivymaew's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.75
Graphic: Cursing, Death of parent, Sexual violence, Death, Suicide, Religious bigotry, Sexism, Sexual content, Injury/Injury detail, Misogyny, Toxic relationship, Gaslighting, Grief, Classism, Suicidal thoughts, and Suicide attempt
jen_sten's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Graphic: Gaslighting, War, Violence, Blood, Death of parent, Sexual violence, Sexual content, Physical abuse, Genocide, Toxic relationship, Classism, Death, Murder, Emotional abuse, and Child abuse