Reviews

You Should Have Known by Jean Hanff Korelitz

mrsbear's review

Go to review page

No rating on this one. I tried very hard because the synopsis sounded good but after listening to 10 chapters I threw in the towel.

What doesn't work for me may be your favorite book so give it a go if it sounds like a book you will like.

jimmyjamesnickels's review

Go to review page

2.0

The blurb copy of this book introduces us to Grace, a New York city relationship therapist married to a pediatric oncologist, living the good life in New York City with their pre teen son. Grace is poised to release what will no doubt be a best selling self help book on the subject of how women take more care in selecting a plumber or purse than they do with their choice in partner. Grace claims that the issues which often cause deep unhappiness if not out-right disaster for a marriage are present from the start of the relationship but women (and women only, of course. Of course) willfully blind themselves to the faults of their partners only to somewhat justifiably reap the whirlwind later. And then suddenly and without any warning --Grace says-- there is a scandal at her son's over priced private school, followed by her husband going missing, these unexpected --Grace says-- turn of events leading Grace reluctantly down a dimly lit path of self discovery.

That's what the jacket synopsis says this book is about, more or less. However, ounce for ounce, word for word is a book about the wealthy elite in New York and their status trappings. Anything to do with the characters and plot development barely seems an afterthought, the majority of this book was spent in a smug masturbatory celebration of the horrible, racist and entitled 1% of NYC. The stuff about the misdeeds of the husband are really just a footnote.

That which is purported to be the book's focus honestly is left in the dust as the author ruminates endlessly on life in NYC; trying and failing to sound modest in her effort to describe awesome to be stinking rich, and New York City is the bestest greatest city in the universe. The character of Grace tries half-heartedly for grace and self awareness in regards to the ridiculous, class codified elite circles in which she orbits, but it really just came across as hypocritical. Her efforts to elevate herself above everyone she interacts becomes grating. In her efforts to separate herself from those Other People who are blinded because they have their head firmly up their own asses, Grace does nothing more than solidify her solid status as on of them.

I just didn't enjoy this book, could you tell?

Beyond the eye rolling "I heart NYC" elitism, it's just an excessively wordy and dull book. It was next to impossible not to skim. The author makes a point and them spends two-three-four pages meandering away from what she was originally going to say. It's dull, the words plod and drag from chapter to chapter. I don't mind when a book takes it's time to slowly reveal plot, don't mind a few wrong turns or misdirection. But in YSHK, there are out and out flat contradictions with no exposition. The choice to almost entirely remove the character of the husband from the entire freaking book was a huge mistake, IMO. The only perspective we have of the character's character comes from Grace herself, who more or less spends the first half of the book talking about how he's the best, most perfect husband ever in the best most perfectly satisfying marriage ever only to flip the switch and decide she's married to a psychopath the whole time and had literally no idea.

Just as Grace herself continually insists that she's not into blaming the victims, I agree that there are situations where lightning metaphorically strikes in a life or relationship and a person truly had no idea. However, if Grace's lack of insight into the life of her husband of nearly 20 years was the point, it was poorly made. But again, I retreat to my point about how this wasn't actually a book about relationships but about bland and unimaginative NYC worship. Pass.

steffkg45's review

Go to review page

2.0

I've been venting to my friends about what a disappointing book this was so I feel like a full review is warranted here. I had high hopes for this given it was made into a show on HBO and the author is critically acclaimed but just....no.

One of the biggest problems I had with this book was it went into so much pointless detail about Grace's day to day mundane life and how anxious and upset she was. Obviously yes, that is a reasonable feeling for a character in her position to have, but it seemed like the author went overboard in describing over and over how paralyzed she was, how she wanted to vomit, how she did vomit, how her personal items somehow became meaningless because her marriage fell apart, she had no idea how to communicate to people, etc etc. And then just rambling about Grace's judgmental thoughts about others such as the snobby moms at the private school, her weird and honestly somewhat racist obsesssion with Malaga Alves' body, the pointless musings at the end about the bluegrass or whatever band in CT (how does she not know "The Devil Went Down to Georgia"??). Not only did it include pointless musings from Grace, but every character action seemed to be described in excruciating detail. Why do we need to know that when Mitchell gets water he changes the tap from hot to cold and checks the temperature before filling the glass? I think readers know how sinks work. I agree with the other reviews about this book needing to be edited better.

I also felt like the characters were all stereotypes. Grace and the other private school moms were extremely stereotypical wealthy New Yorkers (it really annoyed me how it included the trope of New Yorkers only wearing black, Harlem being "scary", plus why was the comment about the doorman insulting?? And the whole Birkin bag thing! The gratuitous mentions of 9/11 were also really unnecessary), Malaga was not a fully realized character- she was basically a living caricature of a sensual Latina woman who of course was then no longer living, Eva was a cliched evil step mom, Jonathan a cliched hero doctor, Henry some kind of flawless wonder child, even the patients at her therapy practice seemed like stereotypes of sad women who had married some awful guy- I wonder why none of the marital issues described were related to normal mutual incompatability- it seemed like all of the couples were evil asshole men and women who "should have known."

How the characters interacted with each other also strained credulity. Why did Grace always just walk away or in one case literally run away when people kept alluding to things she was in the dark about or Jonathan not being who he really was? Wouldn't most people ask what people are talking about? It seemed like Grace kept making up her own weird conclusions about things without speaking to people although I do give the book credit for acknowledging this to an extent when the publisher brings it up to her at the very end. Her relationship with her dad and step mom made absolutely no sense. Why would Grace expect her step mom to love her like a daughter when she married Grace's father when Grace was an adult? I was also baffled by their reaction to Jonathan going missing, the anger over him missing dinner, and the whole thing about the china set that they actually do point out- Grace should have just spoken up to ask for it! It seemed like it was all just to drive home the "evil stepmom" point. All these things about Grace's behavior would have made more sense if she were designed to be an unlikeable character but I did not get the sense the author was going for that.

Other non sensical things were how Vita apparently hated Jonathan on sight and then Grace and Vita let their whole relationship fall apart without ever talking to each other- or I guess one drunken conversation? Why would Grace never think to ask what the deal is? And it was super weird how everything was just magically ok when they met up again- I get that friends reconnect, but it seemed way too "perfect." The reconnecting with her in laws seemed way too picture perfect (especially with them adopting Malaga's baby! That was so awful it was presented as heartwarming that they renamed her baby, that's actually really rude and also racist since I think Malaga gave her a name reflecting her Colombian heritage), Eva suddenly being this nice person, the neighbor who she reconnected with, even Henry fitting in perfectly in his new school was strange (the musings from Grace about the quality of public schools was extremely obnoxious as a side note). And it was strange too how other characters just dropped off. What happened to Sylvia who was trying to help Grace?

The whole bit about Grace having to flee NYC and the time line of that was also baffling. Having to leave for a few days is fair enough, but the news cycle wouldn't focus on this for MONTHS if there were no updates on the case which is what was implied. How was she not in contact with people for that length of time (since among other people she ignored, she apparently just ignored her publisher and they were not mad at her and wanted to still promote her book)?? How did the detectives take that long to find Jonathan? To be fair, I have not experienced anything remotely like this so maybe I am off on this, but it just seemed so odd how she had to completely move, sell her amazing apartment that she owned outright thanks to her family, start a whole new practice, and what not. Yes, this is super traumatic, I get it, but it just seemed contrived for maximum uneccessary drama. When I read the back of the book before starting it I thought this was going to be about her rebuilding her life because her husband's actions put her life in danger, not that she was just ashamed. Oh and conveniently, she had plenty of money to do all this and Jonathan very conveniently did not steal all their money when fleeing himself.

Getting to Jonathan, it was said he was a psychopath but I don't think that was adequately demonstrated. He just sounded like a lying, cheating, temperamental asshole. The big reveal from his family made absolutely no sense and I had to read that multiple times because I thought the whole thing about the younger brother dying of a fever was a cover for Jonathan actually murdering him but the parents really were saying they left their young child with a high fever at home while they went to a bat mitzvah, blamed their teenage son when the fever got worse, and then wondered why he had different stories about why the kid was outside playing? Who in their right mind does that? That absolutely sounded like awful parenting, even for the 70s, and the whole thing about Jonathan being protected so he wouldn't be prosecuted was absolutely not something that would happen because no one in real life would hold him responsible for his brother's death, legally or otherwise. The other descriptions of his behavior just sounded like he was a huge jerk, I was confused about how that was supposed to show he was seriously a psychopath. The rambling story from that Turd guy was only vaguely enlightening and mostly pointless since it seemed to repeat a lot of what we already knew along with pointless side comments. Speaking of that when Grace brought Jonathan being a psychopath up to his parents, she is absolutely not qualified as a practioner to diagnose someone as a psychopath and I was also really irritated when she was describing someone else as "a little bipolar," and she wondered if the Turd guy had autism, no therapist should talk about mental health that way- if her character was meant to be a bad therapist, sure, but it seemed like she was supposed to be some amazing one. The whole thing about the letter from Jonathan was strange as well, I wish the book had had showed how he was lying about everything with some kind of reunion or her confronting him when the cops brought him in instead of just the detective saying how he made everything up, fled to Brazil, etc. Last- did Grace and Jonathan not have any kind of interaction between their first date and the present?? (Aside from bringing up all the places they "made love.") It was so odd how Grace kept flashing back to their first meeting as if nothing happened in between.

Ugh and a last thing about Grace, but why does Grace, a 39 year old wealthy woman in 2014 not know how to use a cell phone?? She apparently doesn't know how to log on to check her bank accounts either since that is described as taking a "humiliating" hour on the phone.

I realize there is some irony in leaving a long rambling review for a book that was too long and rambly, but there was just so much that drove me nuts about this book. I only finished it because I wanted to know what happened and was waiting for the "thriller" part and it just completely dragged on and fizzled at the end. I looked up the plot of The Undoing (the HBO show based on this book) and it looks like it has been changed in a number of ways to hopefully make a lot more sense and be less annoying. I will end with, I have been to Long Island a number of times and never once have been offered Entenmann's and coffee. How disappointing. This book has inspired me to pay a visit to Zabar's though where I have not been in way too long so that is a positive.

alpierce8's review

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.5

katie_schabilion's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

sandygx260's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Good grief, the novel was far better than the HBO series. Shocker, eh?

cadeyladey's review

Go to review page

mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

ginny17's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

3.5

magicacat's review

Go to review page

4.0

How much can you really know someone? How much can you ever really trust them?
An enjoyably twisty story that explores just those questions.

dearkatie's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I loved the tv show but this was far better, and different