You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Reviews

I Am a Strange Loop by Douglas R. Hofstadter

zabiume's review

Go to review page

maybe it wasn't the right time but it did not grab me as much as I thought it would 

coronata's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

Sadly, I Am a Strange Loop is nowhere near as good as GEB, but it was still mostly pleasant to read. I switched to audio partway through because my eyes kept glazing over and found it to be a nice companion for getting my chores done.
My main criticism is that Hofstadter frequently loses the plot with his bajillion anecdotes and personal asides, which weakens the overall argument. GEB worked so well largely because it was coherent and (relatively) objective; this book is much more of a personal ramble. The sections where he argues that, for example, playing Bach "wrong" means someone is "less conscious" were very odd and make his whole argument about "souls" come across as judgemental and myopic. It's a shame because GEB was such a thought-provoking book! 
I will say that the chapter(s) where he discusses the loss of his wife, Carol, and the impact it had on him—and how she still "exists" in him—were really lovely. He clearly loved (loves!) her very much and that love made those chapters far more engaging than the rest of the book. Perhaps this book should have been a memoir instead? 

elsie_n's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny reflective medium-paced

3.5

mgalvan's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Hofstadter, you were doing something relatable for a moment, then it was greedily incoherent.

Reading this book is like spray painting a lamb's wool just because you can.

adze's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I don't need to go into why this book is bad as plenty of other readers have done so marvellously. Link, link, link and link. But if you do end up reading it, treat it not like a book, rather a long monologue turning into background buzz that might trigger you to some of your own ideas.

megankgates13's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

4.0

alexkehayias's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful informative inspiring reflective slow-paced

5.0

vertaren's review

Go to review page

challenging funny informative inspiring reflective slow-paced

4.0

quasar728's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative mysterious reflective slow-paced

3.25

queenerdloser's review

Go to review page

4.0

overall, this was an interesting read. hofstadter's writing is clear, playful, and easy to understand and he uses a lot of fun, silly, and useful anecdotes to elucidate his points. at the very least, it was not the stuffy, boring philosophy I've read in the past!

the several chapters covering math concepts were a bit much for me - i struggled to get through them, though I'm sure other, more math-minded readers, probably enjoyed them or, at least, didn't have any issues. that said, they were clear enough that i at least understood the material even if i had to slow down and only a few chapters out of the book. i enjoyed the later half of the book much more than the first half - it felt like a lot of the first half was merely set-up for what came later and lingered a little longer on it than i felt was necessary to get an understanding of the concepts in the later half.