Reviews tagging 'Suicide'

En toen waren er nog maar... by Agatha Christie

376 reviews

limdurlu's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ed_moore's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Ten Little Soldier Boys went out to Dine, one choked his little self and then there were nine.
Nine Little Soldier Boys stayed up very late; One overslept himself and then there were eight.
Eight Little Soldier Boys travelling in Devon; One said he’d stay there and then there were seven.
Seven Little Soldier Boys chopping up sticks; One chopped himself in halves and then there were six.
Six Little Soldier Boys playing with a hive; A bumblebee stung one and then there were five.
Five Little Soldier Boys going through a door; One stubbed his toe and then there were four.
Four Little Soldier Boys going out to sea; A red herring swallowed one and then there were three.
Three Little Soldier Boys walking in the zoo; A big bear hugged one and then there were two.
Two Little Soldier Boys sitting in the sun; One got frizzled up and then there was One.
One Little Soldier Boy left all alone; He went and hanged himself and then there were none. 

The initial title of Agatha Christie’s ‘And Then There Were None’ was perhaps the only fault of this story. The characters could have had a little further development too to engage a greater reader connection but for the premise of the story I would argue it wasn't overly necessary. It was a murder mystery so well crafted to the verses of the old nursery rhyme ‘ten little soldier boys’ that each of the ten people invited to Soldier Island off the coast of Devon died as the soldiers did in the verses of the rhyme. Those ten were the only people on the island, meaning the murderer must be among the cast of victims. Each had committed a murder in their past that was unpublishable by the written law hence the enactment of the deaths was a passing of justice, where in paranoia people are turned against one another in a bestial manner in effort to not be killed like all those around them. It was such an excellent tale of human instinct and morality so cleverly tuned by the rhyme and concluding almost poetically, fate playing its cards. The lack of a detective also enhanced the intensity of the mystery, for the reader became the detective because the murders were ongoing, and to oneself the next victim was always assured but unknown. The red herrings are even plainly spelled out but just slip under ones nose. I cannot doubt the genius of Christie’s mystery and the role it placed I as the reader in perhaps made it the most engaging, well thought out and intense murder mystery stories I have ever read, I absolutely loved it. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jcreads85's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

This was my first Agatha Christie novel. I didn’t hate it, but neither was it a 4 or 5 star either. It was intriguing but her tales don’t age well in some ways. I do think I’ll give her work another chance; however, I'm not part of the camp who will say she’s top notch. At least, not yet. I can say, though, that I see how her books and writing style transfer well to the screen. 

I’m grateful for the list of the cast of characters at the beginning. I just wish I hadn’t needed to reference it so much. I also loved the mini parts, basically a shift in perspective, within each chapter. However, this really started out slow and I almost put it aside. I was just so determined to get it read this month as it was so short.


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

marija_m95's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

maralyn2215's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

There is a lot of murder and suicide talk

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

knitsandnovels's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kwichris's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

For as much as I enjoy older literature, I can't believe it took me this long to read Agatha Christie! She truly is in a class above the rest in making murder mysteries that truly keep you guessing. It's easy to see how later films, shows, and books have used this novel in particular as a framework (i.e. the movie Clue opens and has very similar scenes in the beginning for instance). While I did find the story captivating and thrilling to read through, there were a few things I took issue with. I've always disliked when authors insert obscure or rarely used words despite the rest of their writing being wholly different in tone and style (i.e. Christie uses "verisimilitude" for instance as something a character says, which even an educated person would probably have used other verbiage in this time/setting). I also dislike when an author continuously uses ONE adjective repeatedly for EVERYTHING. Christie does this with the word "queer" (the older version of the word mind you), and she makes every character say or think practically everything is "queer." There are dozens of other words that she could've used to broaden the diction of her characters and world, but, alas, it's the one she stuck with until the very end. Overall, I did quite enjoy the story and the surprise at the end, demonstrating her aptitude for mystery writing that is hard to match, and I do recommend it to anyone considering it. Now, to check out some other Christie novels and see what other mysteries she has in store!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

itsame_dio's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

It’s a reason this book has inspired many mysteries to do this day. It was published in 1939 so there’s casual antisemitism and racism but it’s mainly at the beginning and not focused on. I would recommend reading the psychical book over the audiobook. While the narrator had distinct voices for everyone, I couldn’t really grasp onto any of the clues. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

alicebarbarian's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

xabbeylongx's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Spoilers Ahead
Honestly, I was not expecting this book to be that good. In the beginning, there were a few comments that made me wonder whether I was going to like the book, but it turned out to be a thoroughly enjoyable read. 
We follow a group of people as they are lured onto an island - Soldier Island, to be exact. I won’t go into each character in detail, as it will probably take all day, and, if I’m honest, I can’t remember half of their names. All of them don’t know each other, and have been sent letters by a man called Owen, inviting them using their own needs to get them down there. One of them was offered a job as a secretary, others the promise of seeing an old friend, etc etc. 
They get to the island and go to the house, and each pick out a room. At this point, there is no sign of Owen, and he has sent a letter saying he is ‘caught up’. In each room is a poem about 10 little soldiers, a dear old nursery rhyme, describing how each soldier died until there was none left. They all think about how weird it is. 
They go down for dinner. Unfortunately, a grammar phone plays a particularly scary message, accusing all of them of killing people. No one knows this yet, but these are all true, accident or not. They accuse everyone of setting it off, not trusting anyone. 
One of them dies. They rule it a TW suicide, but others exclaim that the man didn’t seem like he would do that. They find that out of the 10 little soldier statues on the table, only 9 remain. Shaken, they all go to bed. And, when they wake up the next morning, another one of them dies, this time a woman. 
They start pointing fingers at each other. One by one, they are picked off, and killed. In accordance to the rhyme on their walls, they go in that order and suffer that fate, and then the little china soldiers are slowly hidden. 
They keep going, blaming each other, until one of them shoots the other, and she’s left alone, with 9 dead bodies around her. TW ‘One Little Soldier Boy left all alone; He went and hanged himself, and then there were none’. It wasn’t the grief of killing someone that made her hang herself, for the noose was already set up, but she felt the presence of the man she loved, and wanted to do what she knows he wanted her to do. 
Ten people dead on an island, no one else there, and the police are baffled. But who done it? 
The killer writes a letter in a bottle, and puts it out to sea. He says that out of all of the 10 people, only 1 of them was innocent (the one that sentenced someone to prison, who eventually got hanged for his crimes - crimes he definitely committed, so his conscience is clear). It was him that was the killer, one of the 10. ‘A red herring swallowed one and then there were three’. He faked his own death, and made it look like it was other people doing the killing, and then he killed himself afterwards, to corroborate his story. He said that he had the urge to kill, but not any innocent people, because he liked justice. So, he killed people that were guilty of murder, and then he felt he was doing a service for the world. 
I love this book. I loved the fact that all the characters were so just distasteful, I think it worked really well with the plot. As I said, there were a few comments, particularly about ‘queer’ people (I’m assuming they meant weird, but I’m not 100% sure) and some misogynistic comments, but they seemed to be few and far between, and it got a lot better towards the end. It might just be me being sensitive, to be fair, but I just remember feeling a bit uneasy whilst reading those parts. 
Honestly, I don’t have much to say about this book, only that I would definitely recommend reading it. It’s a nice mystery book, quite an easy read, and definitely intriguing. I love the fact that everything is tied up and makes sense, and I love the fact that there is a poem to go along with the plot. It’s very clever, and I love it! 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings