Scan barcode
markfoskey's review against another edition
3.0
Clement's science fiction really was fiction about science - his day job was as a chemistry teacher, and he was interested in thinking in some detail about the consequences of of life under alien conditions. And sharing that thinking with his readers.
This leads to a particular kind of story that appeals to a particular kind of audience. Premise is all in his novels. What would life be like on a world that rotated so fast its gravity was 200 times greater at the poles than the equator? How would an alien from a much hotter world perceive Earth?
By this standard, Half Life does not overwhelm. The premise is a grim one, but not particularly exotic. A few hundred years from now, new, deadly diseases start to crop up faster than medical science can combat them, and humanity's long population growth turns into a decline, with a half-life of just under 70 years. Other species are dying too. Scientific research is placed on a quasi-military footing to try to find a way to halt the decline. The book follows a crew of scientists and engineers prospecting for possibly helpful scientific discoveries on Saturn's moon Titan. Titan is, in real life, a chemically interesting moon, with hydrocarbon lakes under a thick nitrogen atmosphere, and the hope in the book is that exploring the chemistry of such an alien environment might fill in gaps that could somehow help. The jackpot would be to catch a new form of life in the process of evolving from non-life.
The crew does not expect to return to Earth, and mostly suffer from the various terminal illnesses that have been afflicting humanity.
There are adventures, deaths, and injuries; puzzles and discoveries; and (characteristically) very little emotion. The portrayal of Titan is convincing (in some ways the best part of the book) and the landing of the Huygens Probe in 2005 did little to prove Clement wrong.
Even though this is far from Clements' most interesting or cleverest book, I wonder if it isn't one of his most personal ones. He was in his late seventies when he wrote it, and, as he looked around and saw more of his contemporaries dying, it must have felt on a small scale like what all of humanity faced in his book. As an older person living with diabetes, he could probably relate to his characters' challenges with their medical conditions. Also like his characters, he was a curious soul who took great pleasure from finding things out. I hope the last line if his book was true for him:
"They lived happily ever after while they lived."
This leads to a particular kind of story that appeals to a particular kind of audience. Premise is all in his novels. What would life be like on a world that rotated so fast its gravity was 200 times greater at the poles than the equator? How would an alien from a much hotter world perceive Earth?
By this standard, Half Life does not overwhelm. The premise is a grim one, but not particularly exotic. A few hundred years from now, new, deadly diseases start to crop up faster than medical science can combat them, and humanity's long population growth turns into a decline, with a half-life of just under 70 years. Other species are dying too. Scientific research is placed on a quasi-military footing to try to find a way to halt the decline. The book follows a crew of scientists and engineers prospecting for possibly helpful scientific discoveries on Saturn's moon Titan. Titan is, in real life, a chemically interesting moon, with hydrocarbon lakes under a thick nitrogen atmosphere, and the hope in the book is that exploring the chemistry of such an alien environment might fill in gaps that could somehow help. The jackpot would be to catch a new form of life in the process of evolving from non-life.
The crew does not expect to return to Earth, and mostly suffer from the various terminal illnesses that have been afflicting humanity.
There are adventures, deaths, and injuries; puzzles and discoveries; and (characteristically) very little emotion. The portrayal of Titan is convincing (in some ways the best part of the book) and the landing of the Huygens Probe in 2005 did little to prove Clement wrong.
Even though this is far from Clements' most interesting or cleverest book, I wonder if it isn't one of his most personal ones. He was in his late seventies when he wrote it, and, as he looked around and saw more of his contemporaries dying, it must have felt on a small scale like what all of humanity faced in his book. As an older person living with diabetes, he could probably relate to his characters' challenges with their medical conditions. Also like his characters, he was a curious soul who took great pleasure from finding things out. I hope the last line if his book was true for him:
"They lived happily ever after while they lived."
More...