Take a photo of a barcode or cover
adventurous
emotional
hopeful
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Moderate: Child abuse, Homophobia
adventurous
emotional
hopeful
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
“There is magic in the ordinary,” and this book is EXTRAordinary. Hopeful, loving, accepting. Inspirational and heartwarming. So very very beautiful.
Graphic: Child abuse, Grief
hopeful
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Moderate: Child abuse, Transphobia, Forced institutionalization
emotional
funny
inspiring
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Im not sure if the first book needed a sequel tbh. This is clearly written as an antithesis to JK Rowling. In my opinion the plot suffered a bit from this overarching idea. I’m sure it was nice for some people, it was just a bit too shallow and predictable for me.
Moderate: Child abuse, Death of parent
hopeful
lighthearted
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
I think that the story ended on kind of a weird note and some of the writing felt repetitive. That being said, it was cute and I put they book down feeling satisfied. It’s a good read if you don’t think about it too hard and try to bring realistic political trends and behaviors into this fantasy.
Moderate: Child abuse, Death of parent
Minor: Torture
emotional
hopeful
lighthearted
relaxing
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Minor: Child abuse
emotional
funny
hopeful
reflective
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Graphic: Animal death, Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Physical abuse, Xenophobia
Moderate: Confinement, Cursing, Violence, Grief, Death of parent
Minor: Animal cruelty, Domestic abuse, Homophobia, Racism, Transphobia
funny
hopeful
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Honestly, I remember liking The House in the Cerulean Sea when I read it two years ago. This, however, is a somewhat disappointing sequel. Let me just say that the children are amazing; they're hilarious in the beginning, and while the humor tends to stray into "FaceBook meme" territory as the book progresses, the children (especially Lucy) still got a few chuckles.
Arthur is a... well, he's a main character. Unfortunately, his personality can be summed up into this: traumatized in an orphanage. Loves his kids. Loves his fiancé. Mad at government. And... that's about it. He's overprotective and the kids want to be independent, that's the struggle, and yet we only see fragments of this when Sal stands up to him or one of the kids handles something on their own. There's quite a few times where it was simply "Arthur was about to do something to protect the kids, but then the kids protected themselves", andsuddenly he's a changed man in the end. It's disappointing.
Arthur also comes off as very self-inserty. There were multiple times where it felt like something was thrown into the book just for Klune to say "hey, doesn't this suck? Doesn't it suck that this happens??"For example, David, the new child introduced in this book, asks Arthur if they have enough food in the house. Arthur mourns that any child would have to struggle with food scarcity. David not having food in his past is not relevant (to David or the situation of the orphanages) and is never brought up again. We see topics, like homophobia and racism, brought up but never represented or appearing as much more than an afterthought of "hey, this world sucks" or "this person sucks! Not only is she evil and horrible and awful, but also she's homophobic, but she will not say anything about Linus and Arthur's relationship or actually act homophobic directly in any way!"
On that note: Jeanine Rowder. This woman is so comically evil that it's hard to believe this book's target audience is adults.
But I don't feel like being negative much longer. I did enjoy the book at several parts, and I would recommend it to anyone who isn't majorly annoyed by the flaws mentioned above. I only saw one typo in the whole 400-page book! Klune has some habits as a writer that annoyed me, and also as a storyteller, but if you don't take the book too seriously it's still a good time. You can skip the whole court scene, though. It's pretty useless.
Arthur is a... well, he's a main character. Unfortunately, his personality can be summed up into this: traumatized in an orphanage. Loves his kids. Loves his fiancé. Mad at government. And... that's about it. He's overprotective and the kids want to be independent, that's the struggle, and yet we only see fragments of this when Sal stands up to him or one of the kids handles something on their own. There's quite a few times where it was simply "Arthur was about to do something to protect the kids, but then the kids protected themselves", and
Arthur also comes off as very self-inserty. There were multiple times where it felt like something was thrown into the book just for Klune to say "hey, doesn't this suck? Doesn't it suck that this happens??"
On that note: Jeanine Rowder. This woman is so comically evil that it's hard to believe this book's target audience is adults.
But I don't feel like being negative much longer. I did enjoy the book at several parts, and I would recommend it to anyone who isn't majorly annoyed by the flaws mentioned above. I only saw one typo in the whole 400-page book! Klune has some habits as a writer that annoyed me, and also as a storyteller, but if you don't take the book too seriously it's still a good time. You can skip the whole court scene, though. It's pretty useless.
Moderate: Child abuse, Confinement, Cursing, Death, Death of parent
Minor: Child abuse, Homophobia, Racism
hopeful
inspiring
lighthearted
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
An important message with some powerful moments. A lot of kid shenanigans. Not quite as charming as Cerulean Sea, but still enjoyable and valuable.
Moderate: Child abuse, Confinement, Death of parent
emotional
funny
hopeful
inspiring
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Graphic: Child abuse