Reviews

Devil in Spring by Lisa Kleypas

claireteichman's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

leontyna's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced

4.0

I liked the motif of woman's struggle for independence in this one

bribliography's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I could read an entire series about the st. vincent men they have consistently raised the bar for romance without fail. Also I am once again asking for a book about drago my mental health depends on it.

cc_reads15's review

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful lighthearted mysterious fast-paced

5.0

zaza_bdp's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

☆ 3.5/5 ☆

Dès que j'ai vu que Lisa Kleypas avait écrit un roman avec comme héros le fils de St Vincent, j'étais impatiente de le lire, et je dois dire que je n'ai globalement pas été déçue.

J'ai particulièrement aimé la personnalité fantasque et progressiste de Pandora, une féministe avant l'heure, une jeune fille qui aurait pleinement eu sa place au côté des 'laissées-pour-compte' dont faisait partie sa (future) belle-mère. Sa manie de fabriquer des mots est très amusante, et son sens de l'imagination est très rafraîchissant. Pandora est une jeune fille authentique, elle ne minaude pas et fait toujours preuve de sincérité.

St Vincent, enfin Gabriel, hmmmm. Disons qu'il est largement à la hauteur de son illustre père ! Il a la douceur et la gentillesse de sa mère et le magnétisme de son père. C'est un homme absolument craquant, j'ai adoré le voir tomber amoureux de Pandora, et essayer de concilier les désirs d'émancipation de sa belle avec les réalités de leur époque, ainsi que ses propres vues sur le sujet.

La romance est très belle, justement dosée entre sensualité et romantisme. Cependant j'ai trouvé la dernière partie longue et inutile. Certes elle relance le récit, mais pour moi elle n'apporte absolument rien au roman et permet juste d'introduire de nouveaux personnages et de nous donner un aperçu du prochain tome (un tome au demeurant fort alléchant !).

Oh et quel bonheur de retrouver Evangeline et St Vincent, rien que le prologue m'a fait frétiller de joie ! Et Westcliff !! Du coup je me prends à rêver d'une série avec tous les enfants des couples de La ronde des saisons ...

pat_a8's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful inspiring fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

athiya_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I’ll just point out things that I disliked while reading the book:
- Why is there never a heroine who likes being out in society? Do all historical romances have to have the ‘not like other girls’ trope?
- Chest hair = fur. That’s a no from me…
- What was the purpose of the second half of the book? Half-baked conflict with no actual resolution, or anything tbh.

*sigh*

taylor15's review

Go to review page

emotional mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

blockie317's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

I hate rating a Kleypas book this low. But I really disliked the main characters together. I didn’t understand the attraction Gabriel had for Pandora. While Pandora is supposedly 21 years old, she’s written like a teenager, so it’s hard to read about her doing adult things and about an adult man having feelings for her. Just very bizarre. 

Maybe Kleypas was trying to write Pandora as neurodivergent. But if so, I think she needed to be more specific, rather than making Pandora quirky and immature, but just my perspective. Regardless this book didn’t do it for me, which stinks, because there were other positives about it!

bookdevouringmisfit's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

4.5 stars

I've got so much love for this feminist gem <3 One of the best Lisa Kleypas novels and heroines ever.