You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
seawarrior's review against another edition
3.0
First of all, it was courageous and necessary for Weir to write a novel that multiply exposes the ways in which evangelical families inflict harm on their children. The parents in this story are not relentlessly evil, they have some level of affection for their children. Yet they place them into situations where their mental and physical health is compromised, and look the other way or deny that the harm is occurring, even when the evidence is staring them in the face. I found this to be a fairly realistic portrayal of some of the relentlessly evangelical families I have known personally or heard about from the children that escaped.
However, I thought it was negligent to not depict how Essie, Liberty or Roarke distanced themselves from their family's bigoted beliefs, especially since Essie in particular didn't seem to have much access to information that was not monitored by her parents. Disowning these poisonous beliefs taught as moral truths is a process that takes time and is necessary to living the rest of one's life without demeaning others. I just didn't believe that these characters could have emerged from this process so quickly, and from simply knowing a few people who questioned them. The bigoted evangelical young people I knew in school were relentless with their belief system, even when they asserted that they didn't really hate the individual people in groups they disrespected. If they ever unwound these thoughts from their minds, I doubt they would be able to do so successfully in a short amount of time, and while those ideas were still being preached to them. If I'm wrong, that would be wonderful. Yet I wish Weir dug deeper into the process of unlearning bigoted ideas, since the expression of them was an important piece to understanding why the Hicks family was so dangerous not only to their children or town, but to the entire nation.
It's not my place to speak on the depiction of incestuous sexual abuse, since I'm not a survivor of it. Yet I feel that Weir's story only narrowly avoided sensationalization. Scenes where we learned who abused Essie, where her and Roarke were placed in situations where they had to pretend they weren't aware what this abuser had done, and where we learned the amount of people who were culpable for its continuation seemed intentionally written to be as dramatic as possible. Whether this offends or validates survivors of similar abuse, I can't say. The book is extremely tense and quick-paced, with much of the drama leading up to the reveal of the differing traumas the characters' parents had allowed them to suffer. I do think some of these themes could have been written with more sensitivity and depth, yet I commend Weir for telling stories about difficult subjects that many people shy away from acknowledging.
Graphic: Child abuse, Child death, Incest, Pedophilia, Rape, Suicide, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Homophobia, Racism, Xenophobia, and Pregnancy
ahepp's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Moderate: Incest, Rape, and Sexual assault
amb_farr's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
Graphic: Religious bigotry
Moderate: Homophobia, Incest, Sexual assault, and Pregnancy
mom22boys's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Homophobia, Incest, Rape, and Sexual assault
bri_fabiano's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Moderate: Emotional abuse, Homophobia, Incest, Rape, Suicide, Pregnancy, and Outing
lookingmuchimproved's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Homophobia, Racism, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Incest and Rape
princessfabulous's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Moderate: Incest and Rape
Minor: Suicide
kingsamong's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Homophobia, Incest, Pedophilia, and Rape
wolf013's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.75
Graphic: Child death, Homophobia, Racism, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Emotional abuse, Incest, Pedophilia, Rape, and Pregnancy
Minor: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Misogyny, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Suicide, and Abortion
bakinglizbet's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Graphic: Incest