gattolinos_nerdy_nook's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced

4.5

I love learning about history, and listening to this book is no exception. 
I found myself lost in the past listening to each woman's life and how much hardship she had to go through, and at the same time getting a glimpse into the 19th century London.
Learning more about the everyday living of the working class, opposed to the high society that has been better documented and preserved over the years, was a new outlook on what the 19th century expected of society and what support was offered to them.

I found myself talking to anyone who would listen to me about this book, and would recommend it to anyone who likes learning about the 19th century history.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

camz's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective sad fast-paced

5.0

Un libro difícil de digerir. Pero era exactamente lo que buscaba de un libro así, incluso diría que más ya que se preocupa no solo de contarte lo que se sabe de la vida de estas mujeres sino que se preocupa de darte el contexto de por qué sus vidas fueron lo que fueron. 
 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

liviy0017's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

pollyflorence's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative reflective slow-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rhiannonxgrace's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative sad

5.0


What an incredible book. I really enjoy Rubenhold’s writing style and find her to be an easy read, which can’t be said about all historians! This was a rough read, and more than once I had to pause and step away for a little while simply due to the content. But I am so glad I read this. It’s so important to move the focus back on to the womens’ lives and show them as fully fledged people, something that is often discarded when it comes to the Whitechapel murders.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rosienotjen's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative reflective sad medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

distilledreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative reflective sad fast-paced

5.0

 Like so many, I went through a period of absolute fascination surrounding Jack the Ripper. At one point I could have easily rattled off to you the nights he murdered, peppered in some atmospheric facts about Victorian London, and told you the names of each victim. I would have told you the brutality with which each woman was murdered, but I could have told you no more than their names. And like so many, I never stopped and questioned that. I accepted as fact that these women’s identities began and ended with their murders. 

“The truth of these women’s lives is not simple … Ultimately, no one really cared about who they were or how they ended up in Whitechapel.” 

In retrospect, I think accepting their lives up until that point as a mystery helped create the illusion that Jack the Ripper was just a ghost story, something that went bump in the night, with an alluring haze of intrigue as the insurmountable whodunnit. It separated the events from the horror and allowed me to justify my fascination. 

“In order to gawp at and examine the miracle of malevolence we have figuratively stepped over the bodies of those [Jack the Ripper] murdered, and in some cases, stopped to kick them as we walked past. The larger his profile grows, the more those of his victims seems to fade.” 

Therefore, when I first heard of this book being published, I knew I had to read it. The Five did not disappoint. Hallie Rubenhold was able to reveal so much of these women’s lives from census records, lodging ledgers, birth/marriage certificates, and more. I felt a sense of shame that I never assumed these facts were waiting in archives to be unearthed. 

“In order to keep him alive, we have had to forget his victims. We have become complicit in their diminishment.” 

Rubenhold also wrote beautiful prose describing Victorian England. She supplemented her primary resources of Polly, Annie, Elisabeth, Kate, and Mary Jane with incredible detail of what was happening around them in the London they called home. It was beautiful in its language and harsh in its reality. 

Despite being a five-star read, as I would recommend anyone to pick up this book, I do have my hesitations and critiques. 

“The fibres that have clung to and defined the shape of Polly, Annie, Elisabeth, Kate, and Mary Jane’s stories are the values of the Victorian world. They are male, authoritarian, and middle class.” 

The biggest negative I would have is that Victorian morals still clung to these women and leeched into the way Rubenhold discussed addiction, alcoholism, and motherhood. 

Amidst the larger attempt to give these women back their humanity, Rubenhold’s treatment of addiction felt dehumanizing. There were certain tonal inflections that shifted throughout the narrative that took me aback and left a bad taste in my mouth. 

Referring to Annie, Rubenhold wrote: “Of the many tragedies that befell Annie Chapman in the final years of her life, perhaps one of the more poignant was that she needn’t have been on the streets that night, or on any other. Ill and feverish, she needn’t have searched the squalid corners for a spot to sleep. Instead, she might have lain in a bed in her mother’s house or in her sisters’ care, on the other side of London. She might have been treated for tuberculosis; she might have been comforted by the embraces of her children or the loving assurances of her family. Annie needn’t have suffered. At every turn there had been a hand reaching to pull her from the abyss, but the counter-tug of addiction was more forceful, and the grip of shame just as strong. It was this that pulled her under, that had extinguished her hope and then her life many years earlier. What her murderer claimed on that night was simply all that remained of what drink had left behind.” [emphasis added] 

Quite frankly, no. What ended her life was a murderer. She did not die from alcohol poisoning or even tuberculosis; she was murdered with a slit throat. Yes, there are records and accounts that Annie was an alcoholic throughout much of her life and this caused strain on her familial relations, but just because she was an alcoholic does not take away the fact that she was still human. We will never know for certain why Annie felt more comfortable sleeping on the streets than seeking out a family member’s house in the early hours of that morning, but as she died she was more than just a shell of addiction. 

It was an attempt by the author to end the paragraph in a flourish, but it came at the consequence of Annie’s humanity. 

Throughout the book, there is a frequent presumption around the emotions of Polly, Annie, Elisabeth, Kate, and Mary Jane that further uphold Victorian morals and values. While women would have dealt with the pressure to become a mother and embody these values during their lifetime, who is to say that Polly didn’t let out a sigh of relief as she left her children and husband? There was something, most likely multiple somethings, that led her to leave behind one life and create a new one for herself. Again, we will never know for certain those reasons, and because we will never know, I think it is further reducing these women of their identity and freedom of choice if we assume they had one emotion or another surrounding these decisions. To assume they all had a strong maternal instinct that tore them up inside at the choices they made implies shame if they didn’t. I use Polly as the example here, but this holds true for each of the victims. 

While I understand what Rubenhold was trying to accomplish by attaching emotion to the actions of the women, the narrative would have been strengthened considerably if Rubenhold had kept her romanticization to the Victorian streets and ambience instead of implying their innermost thoughts. 

As well, this is more subtle, but Rubenhold frequently referred to the murders just as deaths, which is another tonal inflection that disrupted the narrative for me. These aren’t alleged killings; therefore, the most severe language should be used. 

Whilst I have minor grievances with The Five, I truly believe that Rubenhold was able to accomplish an incredible feat within an accessible format. It is a phenomenal piece of research and an important addition to literature. She took the general assumption that these women were “just prostitutes” and ripped it to shreds with considerable evidence to the contrary. I also greatly appreciated how almost none of the text was dedicated to detailing the murders, or to the identity of Jack the Ripper. This book truly was about the lives of Polly, Annie, Elisabeth, Kate, and Mary Jane; from their childhood until the night of their murder, Rubenhold recounts the paths in life they travelled and what brought them to Whitechapel in 1888. In revealing their lives and movements, Rubenhold destroyed the assumption that they were prostitutes and brilliantly analyzed why that assumption was created and has been upheld over the years. 

“Just as it did in the nineteenth century, the notion that the victims were ‘only prostitutes’ perpetuates the belief that there are good women and bad women, madonnas and whores. 

… 

“Labelling the victims as ‘just prostitutes’ permits those writing about Polly, Annie, Elisabeth, Kate, and Mary Jane even today to continue to disparage them; to continue to reinforce the values of Madonna/whore.” 

If you’ve ever held a morbid curiousity surrounding Jack the Ripper or been intrigued by the Victorian era, I would highly recommend this book. 

“By permitting [the women] to speak, by attempting to understand their experiences and see their humanity, we can restore to them the respect and compassion to which they are entitled. The victims of Jack the Ripper were never ‘just prostitutes’; they were daughters, wives, mothers, sisters, and lovers. They were women. They were human beings, and surely that in itself is enough.” 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nakutski's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative reflective sad medium-paced

5.0

Excellent work of non-fiction and top notch historic research. Highly recommend for those interested in the Whitechapel murders and Victiorian London.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

scripturient's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective sad slow-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

scarlettreadsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional informative mysterious reflective sad medium-paced

4.0

The Five explores the human stories of the lives of the women killed by Jack the Ripper, and a dark history of Victorian London. Polly, Annie, Elizabeth, Catherine and Mary-Jane are famous for the same thing, though they never met. They came from Fleet Street, Knightsbridge, Wolverhampton, Sweden, and Wales. What they had in common was the year of their murders: 1888. The person responsible has never been brought to justice, but the character created by the press at the time has become more famous than any of these five women.⁣

This was such an interesting read. I didn't know much about the Victorians until I read this book. Most people only learn about Queen Victoria, and the upper classes. I loved the fact that this book mainly focuses on the untold lives of the lower classes in London. Throughout history, it was believed that The Ripper only targeted prostitutes. Hallie Rubenhold seeks to dispel this myth, and to tell their true stories.⁣

I deducted a star from this as I did feel that some of the history was repeated a bit, but I think this was due to the fact that many of the women lived quite similar lives. Other than that, I absolutely loved it!⁣

Expand filter menu Content Warnings