Scan barcode
kikiandarrowsfishshelf's review
3.0
Disclaimer: ARC via Netgalley and Open Road Media
I hadn’t heard of the Sandyford Murder case until reading this book. In the 1860s, in Glasgow, a young woman by the name of Jess M’Lachlan was accused of murdering her friend, Jessie M’Lachlan (no relation). The case was in part tried in the press, leading to a public outcry that influenced the case.
Brand’s detailed book about the case not only gives background into the central players, but also evaluates the evidence. She also includes detailed layouts of the scene of the killing.
Jessie M’Lachlan was in service to the Fleming family, and one of the issues of the case is whether Fleming senior had anything to do with the murder. In part, the case highlights issue of class, something that Brand does deal, as well as gender, something that Brand could have had more analysis of. Brand’s primary focus seems to be on the case, and the pros and cons of each side. Brand does give detail about how hog tied M’Lachlan’s defense was because of her changing stories.
While Brand cannot solve a case of such long standing, she does a wonderful job of detailing the living conditions of the time. In fact, this detail brings another layer to the story. How much, one wonder as reading this, have things really changed? Does not society still wash its hands of the poor?
I hadn’t heard of the Sandyford Murder case until reading this book. In the 1860s, in Glasgow, a young woman by the name of Jess M’Lachlan was accused of murdering her friend, Jessie M’Lachlan (no relation). The case was in part tried in the press, leading to a public outcry that influenced the case.
Brand’s detailed book about the case not only gives background into the central players, but also evaluates the evidence. She also includes detailed layouts of the scene of the killing.
Jessie M’Lachlan was in service to the Fleming family, and one of the issues of the case is whether Fleming senior had anything to do with the murder. In part, the case highlights issue of class, something that Brand does deal, as well as gender, something that Brand could have had more analysis of. Brand’s primary focus seems to be on the case, and the pros and cons of each side. Brand does give detail about how hog tied M’Lachlan’s defense was because of her changing stories.
While Brand cannot solve a case of such long standing, she does a wonderful job of detailing the living conditions of the time. In fact, this detail brings another layer to the story. How much, one wonder as reading this, have things really changed? Does not society still wash its hands of the poor?
whatsnonfiction's review
3.0
Although this was a little bit difficult to get into in the beginning, it's worth sticking with for an interesting story by the end. Written in the 1960s about a murder case already a century old, forensic science and technology were worlds ahead even by then, not to mention the advancements we have today. What a different story this all might've been if it had occurred in modern times.
The premise is that a woman in Glasgow is brutally murdered and her best friend put on trial for it. The evidence is shaky, lots of stories from neighbors, servants, passersby, shopkeepers and the like are involved. That can be a little difficult to keep track of, especially because many of their names are quite similar, and the author admits as much. The only viable alternative to the best friend as suspect is the elderly man whose house the murdered woman was a servant in; he also happened to be obsessed with her and had trouble understanding that no means no when she repeatedly turned him down. Both suspects seem unlikely candidates for different reasons and that makes for compelling reading - it seems that it HAD to have been one of them, based on all the strange evidence and their behavior after the crime, but how and why? And like I mentioned before, incredibly frustrating when there's so little technology or forensic science involved compared to modern methods. The police and examiners even leave the body lying where it was found for days afterward while untold number of people traipse through the scene again and again. Crazy!
What stopped me time and again was the language. I admit I'm not at all familiar with the Scottish dialect, especially slang from this era, but many parts of the text, particularly dialogue, are written in it. It lost me. Even trying to sound out some of the words to figure out some similarity to modern English didn't work for me and then I lost portions of the story. Some understanding was possible through just ignoring it and reading on, but not always. And occasionally the author translates these bits and they make a lot more sense. Why couldn't that have always been done if it was so necessary to preserve an authentic feel of the times? The story is remarkably well researched and thorough, so I get why it's helpful to include that kind of dialect, especially if it's indicative of class or station of the times, but some help for the modern, or maybe non-UK English readers, would've improved the story overall. A glossary would be helpful.
It was difficult to get into initially because of the barrage of names (often similar), slang, dialectical language, and events all at once, but bear with this messy beginning section and it makes for a fascinating read, and an excellent contrast to modern research techniques. And a good reminder that truth is always stranger than fiction - even in the context of the case. When the truth eventually comes out in a pretty remarkable twist near the book's conclusion, it's much more bizarre than the stories told for the trial.
I received an advance copy in exchange for a review from the publisher and Netgalley.
The premise is that a woman in Glasgow is brutally murdered and her best friend put on trial for it. The evidence is shaky, lots of stories from neighbors, servants, passersby, shopkeepers and the like are involved. That can be a little difficult to keep track of, especially because many of their names are quite similar, and the author admits as much. The only viable alternative to the best friend as suspect is the elderly man whose house the murdered woman was a servant in; he also happened to be obsessed with her and had trouble understanding that no means no when she repeatedly turned him down. Both suspects seem unlikely candidates for different reasons and that makes for compelling reading - it seems that it HAD to have been one of them, based on all the strange evidence and their behavior after the crime, but how and why? And like I mentioned before, incredibly frustrating when there's so little technology or forensic science involved compared to modern methods. The police and examiners even leave the body lying where it was found for days afterward while untold number of people traipse through the scene again and again. Crazy!
What stopped me time and again was the language. I admit I'm not at all familiar with the Scottish dialect, especially slang from this era, but many parts of the text, particularly dialogue, are written in it. It lost me. Even trying to sound out some of the words to figure out some similarity to modern English didn't work for me and then I lost portions of the story. Some understanding was possible through just ignoring it and reading on, but not always. And occasionally the author translates these bits and they make a lot more sense. Why couldn't that have always been done if it was so necessary to preserve an authentic feel of the times? The story is remarkably well researched and thorough, so I get why it's helpful to include that kind of dialect, especially if it's indicative of class or station of the times, but some help for the modern, or maybe non-UK English readers, would've improved the story overall. A glossary would be helpful.
It was difficult to get into initially because of the barrage of names (often similar), slang, dialectical language, and events all at once, but bear with this messy beginning section and it makes for a fascinating read, and an excellent contrast to modern research techniques. And a good reminder that truth is always stranger than fiction - even in the context of the case. When the truth eventually comes out in a pretty remarkable twist near the book's conclusion, it's much more bizarre than the stories told for the trial.
I received an advance copy in exchange for a review from the publisher and Netgalley.
More...