Scan barcode
english_lady03's review against another edition
4.0
As a Medievalist with a strong academic interest in Medieval Philosophy this book appealed to me. I did have reservations about the subtitle and subject as a Protestant (I know a strange mixture- Protestant and Medievalist), but I strive for a better understanding of my period, so I requested this book from Netgalley and then acquired the Audio edition for listening to 'on the go'.
In some ways, I did now know what to expect. Perhaps a misguided 'Emergent Church' pastor gushing over prayer Labyrinths and meditation whilst just hijacking some quotes from Lewis to back up some seriously dodgy theology and dubious practices.
Instead, I was for the most part quite pleasantly surprised. The book provides a comprehensive overview of Medieval Intellectual and religious tradition, covering everything from the growth of the Universities, to the medieval notion of charity which went hand in hand with the establishment of Hospitals and institutional medical care.
On the way it challenges many deeply held myths and misconceptions about the period. The notion that Medieval people were backwards and ignorant, that science and learning were in terminal decline, that the Middle Ages were all about violence and torture- and even the notion that they believed in a 'works based gospel'.
Personally, I really go in for anything that challenges such ideas, as I firmly believe the Middle Ages has been vilified and badly misrepresented. Some of the usual suspects responsible for a lot of the misinformation today were Humanist scholars and writers of the Enlightenment era- as well as sadly some Protestant theologians.
C.S.Lewis is set up as our guide for the exploration of the time- for not only his works, but his whole worldview and mind-set was steeped in the Medieval. Lewis described himself as a 'Dinosaur' who spoke the language of classical and Medieval Learning. Well if he was a 'dinosaur' then he was a frightfully good and useful one, in the opinion of this Medievalist.
I particularly appreciated the quotations from Lewis and his fellows such as G.K.Chesterton about needing an 'intimate knowledge of the past- so set against the present' and as a foil to Chronological snobbery- to assuming that everything 'current' and 'modern' is good, and everything 'old' or 'Medieval' is bad.
More importantly, these men believed that a person could not be a proper scholar of the Middle- Ages until they thoroughly immersed themselves and 'imaginatively indwells the mind-set of the period, complete with its thoughts, feelings, circumstances and characters'. To not only be a scholar but also an 'experiencer' and ’re-enactor' of the age.
I found myself not only agreeing with, but also being inspired by such insights. I believe such an approach is vitally important to study of the Medieval (or any) time period. I am always saying 'Don't judge the past by modern standards, or expect it to measure up to it', but Lewis said it first and better.
I confess I had the person who condemned me for this approach and tried to force me to judge historical figures according to her values and modern modes of behaviour in mind.
The only points that I did not agree with were some of the author's ideas about how to implement medieval traditions and ideas today.
After setting out the intellectual, rational and moral basis of these traditions it seemed strange for a person to favour the modern approach to select a few practices such as lighting candles and centred prayer as 'worship aids', or the worst extremes of the Charismatic movement with its flair for all things ecstatic and frankly weird.
I am very suspicious of such practices as Lectio Devina being incorporated into church practice today. I can understand medieval monks repeating passages from scripture to commit them to memory when they did not have their own copies- but we should not seek after mystical experiences, and particularly those which involve altered states of consciousness.
Nor did I agree that the 'Charismatic movements' of America in the twentieth century represented some kind of Golden Age, or point of reference that we should use medieval mystical practices to return to.
I don't think rolling around in laughing hysterics or imitating animals as we see television videos of people doing at places like the notorious Toronto Airport Church is doing the church any good.
I'm all for not dismissing anything Medieval as bad and unchristian, but I would be mindful about incorporating everything the author recommends into Christian life. Let us instead follow the advice of the Medieval, and use our reason and discernment rather than leaving our brains at the proverbial church door.
I would recommend for anyone who is a fan of C.S.Lewis, and interested in the Intellectual Milieu of the middle Ages. I would also recommend to anyone interested Medieval History who does not understand it, and still believes some of the misconceptions and Hollywood version. It will totally change your thinking.
I received an E-book version of this book from Brazos Press via Netgalley for the purposes of review, and purchased the audiobook of my own volition. I was not required to write a positive review and all opinions expressed are my own.
In some ways, I did now know what to expect. Perhaps a misguided 'Emergent Church' pastor gushing over prayer Labyrinths and meditation whilst just hijacking some quotes from Lewis to back up some seriously dodgy theology and dubious practices.
Instead, I was for the most part quite pleasantly surprised. The book provides a comprehensive overview of Medieval Intellectual and religious tradition, covering everything from the growth of the Universities, to the medieval notion of charity which went hand in hand with the establishment of Hospitals and institutional medical care.
On the way it challenges many deeply held myths and misconceptions about the period. The notion that Medieval people were backwards and ignorant, that science and learning were in terminal decline, that the Middle Ages were all about violence and torture- and even the notion that they believed in a 'works based gospel'.
Personally, I really go in for anything that challenges such ideas, as I firmly believe the Middle Ages has been vilified and badly misrepresented. Some of the usual suspects responsible for a lot of the misinformation today were Humanist scholars and writers of the Enlightenment era- as well as sadly some Protestant theologians.
C.S.Lewis is set up as our guide for the exploration of the time- for not only his works, but his whole worldview and mind-set was steeped in the Medieval. Lewis described himself as a 'Dinosaur' who spoke the language of classical and Medieval Learning. Well if he was a 'dinosaur' then he was a frightfully good and useful one, in the opinion of this Medievalist.
I particularly appreciated the quotations from Lewis and his fellows such as G.K.Chesterton about needing an 'intimate knowledge of the past- so set against the present' and as a foil to Chronological snobbery- to assuming that everything 'current' and 'modern' is good, and everything 'old' or 'Medieval' is bad.
More importantly, these men believed that a person could not be a proper scholar of the Middle- Ages until they thoroughly immersed themselves and 'imaginatively indwells the mind-set of the period, complete with its thoughts, feelings, circumstances and characters'. To not only be a scholar but also an 'experiencer' and ’re-enactor' of the age.
I found myself not only agreeing with, but also being inspired by such insights. I believe such an approach is vitally important to study of the Medieval (or any) time period. I am always saying 'Don't judge the past by modern standards, or expect it to measure up to it', but Lewis said it first and better.
I confess I had the person who condemned me for this approach and tried to force me to judge historical figures according to her values and modern modes of behaviour in mind.
The only points that I did not agree with were some of the author's ideas about how to implement medieval traditions and ideas today.
After setting out the intellectual, rational and moral basis of these traditions it seemed strange for a person to favour the modern approach to select a few practices such as lighting candles and centred prayer as 'worship aids', or the worst extremes of the Charismatic movement with its flair for all things ecstatic and frankly weird.
I am very suspicious of such practices as Lectio Devina being incorporated into church practice today. I can understand medieval monks repeating passages from scripture to commit them to memory when they did not have their own copies- but we should not seek after mystical experiences, and particularly those which involve altered states of consciousness.
Nor did I agree that the 'Charismatic movements' of America in the twentieth century represented some kind of Golden Age, or point of reference that we should use medieval mystical practices to return to.
I don't think rolling around in laughing hysterics or imitating animals as we see television videos of people doing at places like the notorious Toronto Airport Church is doing the church any good.
I'm all for not dismissing anything Medieval as bad and unchristian, but I would be mindful about incorporating everything the author recommends into Christian life. Let us instead follow the advice of the Medieval, and use our reason and discernment rather than leaving our brains at the proverbial church door.
I would recommend for anyone who is a fan of C.S.Lewis, and interested in the Intellectual Milieu of the middle Ages. I would also recommend to anyone interested Medieval History who does not understand it, and still believes some of the misconceptions and Hollywood version. It will totally change your thinking.
I received an E-book version of this book from Brazos Press via Netgalley for the purposes of review, and purchased the audiobook of my own volition. I was not required to write a positive review and all opinions expressed are my own.
bryanthebroome's review against another edition
4.0
While the title implies an in-depth, systematic analysis of Lewis' works as representative of Medieval thought, I was pleasantly surprised by the focus on Medieval Christian theology and wisdom, with the regular head nod to Lewis' utilization of those ideas. And while there are Lewis quotes aplenty, you'll find they're evenly matched (numerically) with primary source quotes from the likes of Anselm, Augustin, Kempe, and Abelard.
As an overview of the way Medieval Christians- for, despite the modern Protestant tendency to dismiss the entirety of the Middle Ages as beholden to superstition and fancy, the Medieval period is part of the historic treasury of the Christian inheritance- looked at the world, this book does a marvelous job of showing how the modern tendencies to focus on the individual as the locus of Christian knowledge and scriptural interpretation is just that: modern. Instead, the historian will see in the Medieval Church a reliance upon the wisdom of those who have gone before to inform one's faith, doctrine, and practice.
Of particular note is his articulation of the Medeivals' Universe-encompassing sacramental worldview: that the entire universe contains God in an immanent way such that everything you meet is in some sense an encounter with our Divine Ruler. This very idea of a "Universe" is what led to the creation of the University (a Christian idea) and the focus on ministries of temporal mercy is what led to the founding of hospitals throughout Christendom.
Where I fear I must deduct a star is in some of Armstrong's conclusions on doctrinal matters, such as the suitability of images of God in our daily reverence and reflection. This is a mar on his otherwise helpful and perspective-widening explanation of the heritage that many Protestants often, to our detriment, seem all too eager to leave behind.
As an overview of the way Medieval Christians- for, despite the modern Protestant tendency to dismiss the entirety of the Middle Ages as beholden to superstition and fancy, the Medieval period is part of the historic treasury of the Christian inheritance- looked at the world, this book does a marvelous job of showing how the modern tendencies to focus on the individual as the locus of Christian knowledge and scriptural interpretation is just that: modern. Instead, the historian will see in the Medieval Church a reliance upon the wisdom of those who have gone before to inform one's faith, doctrine, and practice.
Of particular note is his articulation of the Medeivals' Universe-encompassing sacramental worldview: that the entire universe contains God in an immanent way such that everything you meet is in some sense an encounter with our Divine Ruler. This very idea of a "Universe" is what led to the creation of the University (a Christian idea) and the focus on ministries of temporal mercy is what led to the founding of hospitals throughout Christendom.
Where I fear I must deduct a star is in some of Armstrong's conclusions on doctrinal matters, such as the suitability of images of God in our daily reverence and reflection. This is a mar on his otherwise helpful and perspective-widening explanation of the heritage that many Protestants often, to our detriment, seem all too eager to leave behind.
ctsmith53's review
4.0
Enjoyed the book. Lots to appropriate from Lewis and his appropriation of medieval believers, as well as directly from medieval Christians. Helpfully dispels some myths about medievals and shows how we can learn from and benefit from our brothers and sisters who walked with Christ centuries ago. I found myself less enthusiastic than the author about adopting some medieval practices, but it’s not necessary to agree with all of the author’s conclusions in order to benefit from the book. I’m sure I will be returning to this book in the future.
More...