Scan barcode
georgey1809's review against another edition
challenging
dark
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? No
2.5
katkinslee's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
It was ok, rather incoherent though.
sarrocco's review
dark
emotional
mysterious
fast-paced
5.0
Creative process, writing, history, supernatural, South, psychological
kate_elizabeth's review
4.0
3.5 stars
Creepy, eerie, like Flannery O'Connor but less irritating. Would have been a solid 4 but for the end of the Binders' story...I wanted more.
Creepy, eerie, like Flannery O'Connor but less irritating. Would have been a solid 4 but for the end of the Binders' story...I wanted more.
jjtrippy's review
2.0
I was really disappointed in this. The haunting was a background occurrence at best and the writing was really disjointed and confusing. As soon as something interesting started happening, the book abruptly shifted to a different time and setting which was really frustrating.
There were certain points, like the thing with Aaron Swaw, that really didn't make much sense and didn't fit in with anything in the plot. That situation never got resolved either so I'm not sure what it's purpose was in the book.
I had a hard time reading this format wise because it wasn't made apparent when someone was speaking. There were no quotation marks and no separation to show that there was dialogue as opposed to thoughts or just general writing.
I had really high hopes for Little Sister Death but I just found myself really disappointed in how the plot shook out.
There were certain points, like the thing with Aaron Swaw, that really didn't make much sense and didn't fit in with anything in the plot. That situation never got resolved either so I'm not sure what it's purpose was in the book.
I had a hard time reading this format wise because it wasn't made apparent when someone was speaking. There were no quotation marks and no separation to show that there was dialogue as opposed to thoughts or just general writing.
I had really high hopes for Little Sister Death but I just found myself really disappointed in how the plot shook out.
flexdza's review
3.0
I was really nervous about reading this book. William Gay is, with out a doubt, my favorite author of the 21st century, and this book is the first of his manuscripts to be released after his death in 2012. The three novels and short story collection he released in his short career are all masterpieces, very polished, very poetic, and very compelling. The prospect of reading what is, despite what his agent and publishers have claimed, an unfinished novel was a bit unsettling to me. Gay's previous works are so pristine and magical that I really didn't want to see what the work looks like before it met his final approval, lest it somehow tarnish his legacy in my eyes. And though the novel is definitely unfinished, it is still worth a read for Gay's fans, though I'd hesitate to recommend it to a reader who has never read any of his work.
At it's core, this is a ghost story. It's very creepy at times, but as far as the narrative goes, too many things are left unfinished. We get brief glimpses of characters that I can only imagine Gay had a much bigger role intended for had he survived to finish the story (i.e. Swaw's grandson, or the old lady wandering through the woods when the Binder's first move in to the Beal estate). A lot of loose ends were left untied, and the lore and mythos that Gay inserts feel awkward and unnecessary, as they never get to reach their conclusion. Overall, the haunted house story is a bit unsatisfying, and frankly, quite a mess given it's unfinished nature.
The other narrative going on in this book, on the other hand, was what really drew me in. Aside from a standard ghost story, this novel is also a bit of a metafiction, as it is also about a novelist trying to write a novel. It's in these moments where I was able to draw the most pleasure as I felt that it offered us a glimpse into Gay's own process. There are some great moments where Gay discusses the fugue state that accompanies writing, the acuteness of vision that the writer receives, and the nuts and bolts of the process. These moments really grabbed me, because as I've stated, I really admire Gay's work, and it was wonderful to get some insight into what made him tick.
As always, Gay's prose is beautiful, and the book is worth a read just to savor the language that he so deftly uses. I just wish that this was a finished piece, because it had the potential to really be something special. The beginning of the novel (the 1785 flashback, Binder's moving to the new house, and the 1933 flashback) is some of the best writing Gay has given us, but after that, the story really falls a part.
I rated this 3 stars mainly because I'm a fan of Gay. If I hadn't been familiar with his work, though, I would have probably given it a two, solely for the beauty of the prose.
At it's core, this is a ghost story. It's very creepy at times, but as far as the narrative goes, too many things are left unfinished. We get brief glimpses of characters that I can only imagine Gay had a much bigger role intended for had he survived to finish the story (i.e. Swaw's grandson, or the old lady wandering through the woods when the Binder's first move in to the Beal estate). A lot of loose ends were left untied, and the lore and mythos that Gay inserts feel awkward and unnecessary, as they never get to reach their conclusion. Overall, the haunted house story is a bit unsatisfying, and frankly, quite a mess given it's unfinished nature.
The other narrative going on in this book, on the other hand, was what really drew me in. Aside from a standard ghost story, this novel is also a bit of a metafiction, as it is also about a novelist trying to write a novel. It's in these moments where I was able to draw the most pleasure as I felt that it offered us a glimpse into Gay's own process. There are some great moments where Gay discusses the fugue state that accompanies writing, the acuteness of vision that the writer receives, and the nuts and bolts of the process. These moments really grabbed me, because as I've stated, I really admire Gay's work, and it was wonderful to get some insight into what made him tick.
As always, Gay's prose is beautiful, and the book is worth a read just to savor the language that he so deftly uses. I just wish that this was a finished piece, because it had the potential to really be something special. The beginning of the novel (the 1785 flashback, Binder's moving to the new house, and the 1933 flashback) is some of the best writing Gay has given us, but after that, the story really falls a part.
I rated this 3 stars mainly because I'm a fan of Gay. If I hadn't been familiar with his work, though, I would have probably given it a two, solely for the beauty of the prose.