Scan barcode
soundtracked's review against another edition
Graphic: Racial slurs and Racism
kloughlin's review against another edition
3.0
Graphic: Murder
Moderate: Racism and Drug use
Minor: Misogyny and Racial slurs
buzzcutduck's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, Xenophobia, and Murder
Moderate: Misogyny
Minor: War
nrogers_1030's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Moderate: Racism, Racial slurs, and Murder
readingelli's review against another edition
2.0
Graphic: Racism and Racial slurs
Moderate: Murder
Period typical racismnathanjhunt's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
3.5
This book hasn't aged well. This is my very first dive into a Sherlock Holmes novel, and I must admit, I wasn't expecting so much racism from it.
It's a snapshot into the British colonial minds and attitudes of the late 1800s. Imperialism was reaching its peak, and that forms the backbone of the plot. The whole basis of the treasure was that it was stolen in the first place. I can't sympathise with any of the characters because they're hunting for colonial gains. It really does leave a sour taste in the mouth.
The casualness of drug use at the beginning of the novel was baffling! They call this era 'The Great Binge' for a reason! If anything, this is an interesting case study into middle-class society of the time.
Casting the plot aside, I did enjoy seeing how Holmes' mind works, and having it from Watson's POV worked very well. There was a lot of monologue and explaining along the way. Every character seems to speak in the same manner and the same words. I feel like Conan Doyle was very comfortable writing as a middle-class man, but had no idea how to write characters from poorer and different backgrounds, and it's full of stereotypes. The cast, I suppose, is diverse, but it's written badly.
I left feeling unsatisfied by the story - why demonise one character, but act like the other was right with what they did? It just doesn't make any sense. And ultimately, Holmes did hardly anything in this novel, if was the characters around him mostly.
I enjoyed it somewhat, and am curious to read other Sherlock Holmes novels, but perhaps this wasn't the best one to start on.
Graphic: Death, Addiction, Drug use, and Murder
Moderate: Racism, Racial slurs, Colonisation, and Xenophobia
Minor: Alcohol and Cannibalism
crowdenks's review against another edition
2.0
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, and Xenophobia
em_davies7019's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, Drug use, Death, and Colonisation
Moderate: Violence and Religious bigotry
Minor: Cannibalism
nesnedis's review against another edition
1.75
Moderate: Racial slurs and Racism
navreet's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.0
Graphic: Racism and Racial slurs
Minor: Sexism