Reviews tagging 'Toxic relationship'

Shadow of Night by Deborah Harkness

6 reviews

amy_reading_23's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

3.75

I enjoyed this book a lot more than the first one. It's possibly one of the best historical novels I've read as it does truly bring Elizabethan England to life. There was also a lightheartedness to this novel that the first one lacked. I also enjoyed the more focused exploration of witchcraft. 

The only reason I won't give it 4 stars is because I still don't like how Matthew treats Diana. Mostly he is better than the first book but that's not saying much. He is still abusive and its still excused as being because of his vampirism and past. It is such a shame as without that these would be great books. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

hexenlibrarian's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

katielaine_w's review

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.0

Turned from a problematic relationship to an abusive one all the good parts of the world building were thrown out ant turned into literal knitting. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

effervescent_worm's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kpem's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.5

I really preferred the second book in this series to the first.  There was a bigger cast of characters and an interesting setting. I was happy to get to more of the mysteries that are central to the main plot of the series, rather than some of the background information and description of Diana's initial attraction to Matthew that dominated the first book.  I still felt that there was too much unnecessary, dense description at times, though with the Elizabethan setting it was often more interesting than in A Discovery of Witches.  Still, it often seemed that the characters had forgotten about their reasons for coming to the past for long stretches of time as they spent no time looking for the book of life or a teacher for Diana.  So much so that I often had to stop and ask myself why they had gone back in time in the first place because I wasn't sure why they were doing some of the things they were doing.  

I had two criticisms while reading, though.  The first is that Diana and Matthew had seemingly no worries about changing the past at all.  They don't even discuss it until they meet Diana's father very late in the book, and by then they had been living in the past for months, travelled the world and interacted with countless people of the past.  It just seemed really strange to me, especially when Diana is a historian with great regard and knowledge of the past.  

Another thing that bothered me was the way that Matthew's "blood rage" was discussed.  I worry that the text wanted us to think of his blood rage in the same way that we think of mental illness.  If this is the case, I am disturbed by the way that it was portrayed as purely genetic and mostly out of his control.  I also have a hard time accepting the sacrifices that Diana has to make to deal with his blood rage.  I know their relationship is meant to be fated in the series, but I think it's dangerous to use that as an excuse to keep characters in an abusive relationship and treat it like it's romantic.  I was particularly bothered by the couple deciding that Matthew would drink Diana's blood, making it impossible for her to keep any secrets or thoughts/experiences to herself, to calm his rage.  I don't think she should have to trade away any privacy for a husband who treats her with kindness.  He may have had a real reason (the blood rage) for his struggles, but that doesn't mean Diana should have to be in a relationship with no boundaries and constant struggle.


Overall this was much better than the first book, in my opinion.  It was dense, long and sometimes meandering, but usually interesting enough to stick with.  I still have massive issues with Matthew, though this sequel did some work in making him a bit more sympathetic.  The best parts by far, for me, were the times when Diana was with the characters that were new to the series, learning more about herself and her own powers.  

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

elenamarmiroli's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Terza rilettura

Continuo a pensare che Matthew in quest'opera si comporti in modo molto discutibile nei confronti di Diana, ma nonostante ciò non riesco a non adorare questo libro. 

Credo che la cosa che apprezzi maggiormente solo la quantità di avvenimenti che queste pagine contengono, ma anche gli sviluppi della magia di Diana.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...