You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

669 reviews for:

Oroonoko

Aphra Behn

2.84 AVERAGE

emotional sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
challenging dark emotional informative reflective sad medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
challenging dark reflective sad fast-paced
Loveable characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
challenging dark emotional informative reflective sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

 This book took me by surprise, we are reading it for my lit course at uni this year and I read some reviews that said that this was boring. But this is beyond anything but boring. I found myself shocked several times and for a book published in 1688 this had some very redeeming views of people of colour. It condemns slavery, and looks heavily down upon those horrible acts committed towards the slaves. I really enjoyed Behn's writing style and was positively surprised by this book. It also gave me an insight into a time period in literature I have little to no experience with reading. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark reflective sad slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

(Not towards reading goal just recording)
adventurous challenging dark emotional sad fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

It's important. You should read it.

Wretched. Had to read this for a class on Post-colonialism. The only reason this particular text entered the syllabus was that the prof specialized in Behn's work in grad school. Besides the overt racism, which is obviously a product of its time, the prose is turgid, extreme violence is romanticized, and the narrator, and perhaps Behn herself, intentionally ignores the horrors of slavery. Truth be told, this was one of the worst texts I have ever read. For those interested in historical context only. The literary merit of this work could not hold up to most of the postcolonial genre.

If I ever wrote a screenplay of an interpretation of a literary text, this would be the one.