Reviews

Too Like the Lightning by Ada Palmer

dubsington's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

too hard to tell whether i liked it or not.

dunno if i can or can't read the next book.

abandonedmegastructure's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny hopeful mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

Too Like the Lightning is a historical book. I don't mean that in the sense that it's a landmark of literature (though to me it is <3), or in the sense that it deals with history-the-subject: I mean that in the sense that it's obviously, overwhelmingly, written by a historian thinking as a historian would. Adopting that mindset is essential to get through the book: learn to make peace with utterly foreign worldviews, frustratingly incomplete exposition, and the contradictory awkwardness of trying to learn objective truth through a subjective source.

The entire book is an in-universe document, occasionally censored or modified by the same ruling powers that show up in the story. The narrator is incredibly unreliable, will deliberately keep key facts silent, and may or may not be lying about a child with supernatural powers. From time to time, the book lapses into script-like raw dialogue, or another character will take over to write a chapter of the book, or the narrator starts arguing with the 'reader', and then has the reader argue back, and then apologizes profusely to this guy he just made up to get deferential at. It's an unique experience, something I've never seen before or again.

Too Like the Lightning isn't a 500-page novel: it's the 500-page setup of a 2000-page novel. That means it serves to introduce the sprawling world so unlike ours, march character after character into the spotlight, and set up plotlines that won't be resolved for another three books. The result is more than a little confusing to read: all I can say in its defense is that everything really does serve a purpose, and if something seems not merely confusing but outright impossible then there's probably something deeper going on and you're correct for picking up on it. Also, it's so good on rereads, everything just falls into place and you'll be stunned how blatantly future plotlines are foreshadowed early on.

What is it actually about, you ask? Philosophy, mostly. Does the end justify the means? Why is there evil in the world? What is the nature of gender? What is the nature of god? Should speech be free or restricted? Questions like these provide the bridge between the individual characters' struggles and the world-spanning events they observe. If you force me to stick to a single adjective, I'd go and label this series thought-provoking more than anything.

Look, if you think you're down to read (and reread) more than half a million words, written with an unique narrative style, describing a fascinating world that raises interesting questions, containing some genuinely hilarious moments, then go for it: the ending is far off, but worth the journey. If that sounds like a lot of effort (and it is, don't get me wrong), I won't fault you for leaving this one be.

rivaina's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious slow-paced

3.0

kivt's review

Go to review page

5.0

not really sure what i thought of that.

bentheoverlordsbooks's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny informative inspiring mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

zaeritha's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

It respects the readers intelligence, and slows the reveal of things in a natural way. It is playful, in a serious way. 

ameyawarde's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I cannot say enough good things about this book! It is deliciously, gloriously dense with details that out the author as a hardcore history nerd (Professor, even!). It's combination of utopia + history is so extremely relevant to my interests I still get giddy every time I try to talk about it. :D I finished this this summer (and forgot to mark it 'read' until now!) but as I go about my life, reading about history and philosophy, as one does, I'm constantly learning new things and remembering it being referenced in TLL and getting excited for how rich this book is all over again. For those who aren't really into history or nerdy details/ideas, I'm not sure how they may like it, it might be just as enjoyable read simply as a fantastic utopian book, but it might be difficult to get through, with the flowery language especially. It took even me quite a few chapter to get into the swing of it, but it was DEFINITELY worth it. This is by far my favorite read of the year, and I cannot wait for Book #2 in February!!

bridgett's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

emanuele_zanellato's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

ayami's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Ugh, that was a chore! Read up to 40% of the book (oscillating between boredom and annoyance) and then I’ve skimmed the rest and read the last chapter (which is a full, mystery reveal, kinda like in an Agatha Christie book - so that was convenient!)

I loved the idea of this book, the premise and the world created. But, dear, oh, dear was the writing condescending and pretentious. And even though I’ve appreciated the ambitious goal and experimenting with the style of narration, in the end, the execution was simply not there. The intrigue was not intriguing enough, the characters felt flat and I realized I just don’t care for any of them. Definitely not enough to slog through FOUR BOOKS of this hell.
So it’s a No from me.