vengefuldime's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I would say the books were 5, 3, and 4 stars respectively for me. While I enjoyed finishing the series, it never returned to what I liked the most about the first book. I will say that the descriptions were always a highlight- I very much enjoyed the atmosphere of the surroundings. The natural world is shown in vivid snapshots that give a feel for the wider world beyond the characters. Even though there are a variety of settings I can see, smell, feel, etc. all of them clearly. The characters in Annihilation are referred to only by title, with very minimal (if at all) physical descriptions. They’re more stand-ins, even the biologist, who is deeply introspective. I feel that this works well in having a distance between what they are to themselves and what they are to a complete outsider. Their dialogue is stiff and unusual, which I would normally not like but did intrigue me early on. They are incorrect and unnatural, and they show something being wrong before they fully realize it. The tone is uncomfortable or frightening because of its alienness. Area X is strange because the rules are unknown, and it will not try to make in self understood. I did become attached to the biologist, and appreciated the unresolved ending as it felt very correct for the tone.

However, the next book was very different and I felt much less interested. It was interesting to see the same style of description in an office setting, but there was much more character focus. There were satisfying moments of unease, but the second and third books were longer in a way that could drag out. The character dialogue was cleaner and more accurate, but the descriptions felt clunky and out of place. After empathizing with the biologist, Control’s perspective never did end up clicking with me. My main petty dislike was his attraction to Ghost Bird that felt clingy and distracting, but mostly his focus was on aspects I was not interested in. The third book being a collection of perspectives brought it back up again for me. While we discover a bit more, I end up with more questions than answers (a positive thing). I think it was still a little longer than it had to be, but I enjoyed the setting again. I especially liked Saul’s sections, which are tragic in the right way. I would recommend the entire series differently based on what a reader is looking for, but personally I would recommend the first book on its own.

clonegarden's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective

5.0

stepriot's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I cannot express my love for this series more. The first book is a beautifully written and lush mystery. I love the way the next two build on it. I know a lot of people don't care for the second and third as much, but I found they completely change the first one into something truly monstrous. The deceit, scale and inevitably of it creeps in with every page. Horror works best when it is insidious, and this series does that better than any I've seen. I've read it several times and each time leaves me in awe. As of now, it is the my favorite work of all time.

klparmley's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I liked the first book the best. The second one was clearly a set up for the third. And the third one was like an extended 2001 ending.

maylajoy's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

*Note: This is not a coherent review in any way, just some thoughts I had on the books. It may contain some kind of spoilers.

There is so much to say about this trilogy as there are many underlying themes surfacing while reading. There is the overarching theme of mirroring, doppelgangers and symmetry - found, for example, in the twin lighthouses and the tunnel/the tower, the latter acts as some kind of distorted mirror image of the lighthouse, in the creature dubbed as the crawler, that resembles the lighthouses lenses, its surface endlessly mirroring and reflecting the light of past and present times as well as in numerous plot lines and actions. There are also the questions of human versus nature and human versus alien - who has the upper hand, which power does the one have over the other, what defines us as human etc. Which in turn brings us to the theme of symbiosis and mimicry - what even is real, how contaminated are our surroundings, our thoughts, are we still on earth, even if it looks like something we know?

All these questions are asked in a very scientific approach; at the beginning Area X seems to be a restricted, developed zone but over the course of the three books the protagonists and the reader slowly, very slowly, are beginning to lose the grip of reality, starting to lose control. The formerly impermeable border breathes and it is even starting to expand. More and more the course of the books, as well as the journey through Area X, change its nature, the act of reading is like lucid dreaming through the Strugatzki brothers’ [b:Roadside Picnic|331256|Roadside Picnic|Arkady Strugatsky|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1173812259l/331256._SY75_.jpg|1243896] and Tarkowski’s Stalker - the Southern Reach-trilogy shares the same sujet with the two works: A widely unexplored and above all inexplicable area (in the sense of its creation but also its essential purpose), confined by an invisible border lies adjacent to human civilization. What happens inside is beyond imagination and nobody is able to explain the origin of these alien-like creatures and mythical ongoings, because everyone who tried to find answers came back somewhat changed - if he came back at all.

As readers, we are only presented small hints of the truth, piece by piece, and we have to search for shreds of evidences, like the protagonists, only to be left with a shattered image of what might be. We follow the white rabbit(s) over the border and are faced with overlapping layers of time, memories and fears. And in the end, we remain with as many questions as all the protagonists that visited Area X.

This trilogy is fascinating, eerie, speculative and very interesting to read. It provides us with no answers but lingers in the head long after finishing the read, trying to make some sense of it. At times it was a bit tedious, especially the second book Authority, but all in all very enjoyable and suitable for newcomers to dystopian/ speculative fiction.

nonesensed's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

A biologist is sent on an expedition into a strangely corrupted area of land from which her husband returned a strangely changed man. Later, an agent who is rather secret is given the task of overseeing the bureau in charge of this 'Area X' and all things that enter and exit from it. Later still, we're given an idea of what Area X truly is and a few whys regarding the actions of people interacting with it.

A brilliant trilogy! I am beyond pleased I chose to read the whole series in omnibus form because the three separate stories flow into each other in such a rewarding way. Annihilation's eerie research trips changes to the outsider perspective of Authority with Acceptance finally tying it all together without explaining too much.

I really don't want to spoil any more about this series. If you're looking for an eerie story of the weird fiction variety with the occasional truly, wonderfully horrific moments of body horror and existential dread, I highly recommend this trilogy to you! 

strategineer's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The Annihilation book was OK but the movie is better.

Please do yourself a favor and do not read the rest of the novels in this series.

After forcing my way through the entire Southern Reach trilogy, I've decided to never read another Jeff VanderMeer novel.

Any goodwill I might have had for the author after reading Annihilation was siphoned away by the other two novels in the series.

lilacullen's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

awryan88's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.25

myriadreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character

5.0