Scan barcode
Reviews tagging 'Murder'
The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson
103 reviews
itsjadenbaby's review against another edition
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.0
I honestly hated this. I thought it would be a fun read for October, but it did nothing but bore my every time I tried to read. It also turned out to be a poorly executed concept which was really disappointing for how classic the story is.
Content Warnings
Minor: Murder
hollystopreading's review
challenging
dark
mysterious
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Nice! Quick read and unlike simaliar books (Frankenstein) gets right into the action.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder
Moderate: Drug abuse and Violence
katebella's review against another edition
mysterious
slow-paced
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Murder and Suicide
skysbooknook's review
dark
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder and Death
clare072's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Alcohol, Death, and Murder
ijustreallyliketrees's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Death, and Murder
Moderate: Suicidal thoughts, Violence, and Suicide
Minor: Body horror
anemonima's review
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
I spoiled myself reading the description of the book on the internet. It would have been so much better reading it knowing nothing about it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Drug use and Murder
paintinyourwing's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
I'm not sure where to start here... This was not what I expected at all! I can't exactly explain how this is a 5 star read for me because that youl spoil the entire book - even if pretty much everyone knows what the story is about.
What really sold me on this was exactly that: I thought I knew the story, and in a way I did but it goes so much deeper. The POV it's written in + the way the book and chapters are structured just keep you guessing until the very end.
The writing is amazing and easy to understand and follow; considering when it was written, and there is a bit of wordplay and even some humour in there (though I'm not sure if that was intended).
What I loved the most is that it doesn't leave any loose threads, the last chapter answers every question - even those I didn't think to ask.
The ending had my mind blown, in all honesty... I listened to the audiobook and had to repeat the last few minutes 3 times and I just absolutely loved it! Speaking of the audiobook; the version I listened to was read by David Barnes - and WOW that was a great choice! His pronunciation, accent and overall tone of voice was just perfect for this story. His tempo was a little slow but that rather added a layer of calm tension in my opinion.
It's a short (audio-)book at about 3h, and would be at 2,5h at 1,5x speed without sounding odd, according to other comments I've seen. Aka it wouldn't be a big waste of time even if you didn't love it so I'd still highly recommend it!
If I did go into the story more I'd probably still sit here tomorrow so I'll leave it at this: there's many more layers to the story than I thought and the more I listened, and the more I'm thinking about it now, the more I figure out and it's still mind boggling to me!
What really sold me on this was exactly that: I thought I knew the story, and in a way I did but it goes so much deeper. The POV it's written in + the way the book and chapters are structured just keep you guessing until the very end.
The writing is amazing and easy to understand and follow; considering when it was written, and there is a bit of wordplay and even some humour in there (though I'm not sure if that was intended).
What I loved the most is that it doesn't leave any loose threads, the last chapter answers every question - even those I didn't think to ask.
The ending had my mind blown, in all honesty... I listened to the audiobook and had to repeat the last few minutes 3 times and I just absolutely loved it! Speaking of the audiobook; the version I listened to was read by David Barnes - and WOW that was a great choice! His pronunciation, accent and overall tone of voice was just perfect for this story. His tempo was a little slow but that rather added a layer of calm tension in my opinion.
It's a short (audio-)book at about 3h, and would be at 2,5h at 1,5x speed without sounding odd, according to other comments I've seen. Aka it wouldn't be a big waste of time even if you didn't love it so I'd still highly recommend it!
If I did go into the story more I'd probably still sit here tomorrow so I'll leave it at this: there's many more layers to the story than I thought and the more I listened, and the more I'm thinking about it now, the more I figure out and it's still mind boggling to me!
Content Warnings
Graphic: Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Mental illness, and Addiction
Moderate: Drug use and Murder
Minor: Suicidal thoughts
samanthaardenlockheart's review
challenging
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
<i>There <b>are</b> spoilers in this review. Proceed with caution. ♥️</i>
I thought that this novel was very enlightening, scary, and related to theology and philosophy (especially morals, human nature, and ethics).
In The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson, published in 1886, something worthy of scientific discussion is the societal response to mental health in Victorian England (which was during the 19th century). Based upon this reading, Dr. Henry Jekyll seems to be an individual who allows his deep desire for his flaws to be covered up to take over his life. He poisons himself which gives him the scary ability to morph into Mr. Edward Hyde. At the outset, this seems like a basic human desire. But Stevenson demonstrates how Dr. Jekyll plays with fire and inadvertently goes too far after he initially sets out to remedy something as innocuous as his hidden insecurity.
Given the mental health context around this time period, it is fascinating that the author, Robert Louis Stevenson himself, seemed to have suffered from a split personality disorder. According to biographer Claire Herman from National Public Radio, “‘Myself and the other fellow’ is a phrase that Stevenson used to describe two states of consciousness that he experienced, in particular, when he was having a fever one time, you know, to do with his lung problems and his illness. And he wrote to a friend that when he was in a high fever, he felt that his mind split off into `myself' and what he called `the other fellow.' `Myself' was the rational side, and `the other fellow' was the sort of dark side, the creative, difficult, seething side of his subconscious. And he loved it. He loved the fact that he had these simultaneous and slightly conflicting states of mind going on. And obviously, he used it very much in his work. And it animated a lot of his ideas. You know, that you could be two people at the same time.” Taking this into account, I am at least very impressed with Stevenson’s ability to put his experiences with a split personality into literature. While this is not nearly the same thing as narcissistic personality disorder, I made that psychological connection anyway as his novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, focused on the dichotomy between good and evil. Having a split personality does not always mean that it is split between those extremes, however, those with narcissistic personality disorder do go about the world with a harrowingly false persona through living in a false reality.
In the Victorian Era, mental health was enormously stigmatized. Some people were confined to asylums for many years if they were deemed “crazy” or “mad” (Briggs). Family or friends would gain financially by treating even just eccentric or truly mentally ill people in this way. The innocent people in the asylums had to fight tirelessly for their liberty after being deemed insane. When I take this stigma into account and correlate it back to Dr. Jekyll, I think he was avoiding the stigma of being portrayed as mentally unwell (since he wanted to commit heinous acts) by splitting his personality into two. According to Helen Briggs once more, “Doctors treating the mentally ill were not called psychiatrists but were known as alienists, based on the belief that the self had become alienated from itself.” I think there is a clear correlation between Robert Louis Stevenson’s personality disorder and the stigma around mental health that his society was facing at this time.
However, from my understanding of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde… one character is not trying to battle two personalities. Rather, Dr. Jekyll still wanted to preserve his impressive societal position as a scientist but still live on the edge through Mr. Hyde. Obviously this is only possible in the realm of fiction, but it is fascinating if one imagines it to be real. This is a transformation Dr. Jekyll did succeed in making, but clearly, it ended in disastrous consequences when his transformations into Mr. Hyde started happening against his volition. Looking at this through a philosophical sense think this is a metaphor for the fact that unbridled evil always has the capacity to overcome true goodness.
<b>Works Cited</b>
Briggs, Helen. “Inconvenient People: A Victorian View of Mental-health Treatment.” BBC News, 29 Apr. 2014, www.bbc.com/news/health-27148737.
Herman, Claire. “Robert Louis Stevenson’s Split Personality.” NPR, 27 Nov. 2005, www.npr.org/2005/11/27/5028500/robert-louis-stevensons-split-personality.
Stevenson, Robert Louis, 1850-1894. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
London: English Library, 1974.
I thought that this novel was very enlightening, scary, and related to theology and philosophy (especially morals, human nature, and ethics).
In The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson, published in 1886, something worthy of scientific discussion is the societal response to mental health in Victorian England (which was during the 19th century). Based upon this reading, Dr. Henry Jekyll seems to be an individual who allows his deep desire for his flaws to be covered up to take over his life. He poisons himself which gives him the scary ability to morph into Mr. Edward Hyde. At the outset, this seems like a basic human desire. But Stevenson demonstrates how Dr. Jekyll plays with fire and inadvertently goes too far after he initially sets out to remedy something as innocuous as his hidden insecurity.
Given the mental health context around this time period, it is fascinating that the author, Robert Louis Stevenson himself, seemed to have suffered from a split personality disorder. According to biographer Claire Herman from National Public Radio, “‘Myself and the other fellow’ is a phrase that Stevenson used to describe two states of consciousness that he experienced, in particular, when he was having a fever one time, you know, to do with his lung problems and his illness. And he wrote to a friend that when he was in a high fever, he felt that his mind split off into `myself' and what he called `the other fellow.' `Myself' was the rational side, and `the other fellow' was the sort of dark side, the creative, difficult, seething side of his subconscious. And he loved it. He loved the fact that he had these simultaneous and slightly conflicting states of mind going on. And obviously, he used it very much in his work. And it animated a lot of his ideas. You know, that you could be two people at the same time.” Taking this into account, I am at least very impressed with Stevenson’s ability to put his experiences with a split personality into literature. While this is not nearly the same thing as narcissistic personality disorder, I made that psychological connection anyway as his novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, focused on the dichotomy between good and evil. Having a split personality does not always mean that it is split between those extremes, however, those with narcissistic personality disorder do go about the world with a harrowingly false persona through living in a false reality.
In the Victorian Era, mental health was enormously stigmatized. Some people were confined to asylums for many years if they were deemed “crazy” or “mad” (Briggs). Family or friends would gain financially by treating even just eccentric or truly mentally ill people in this way. The innocent people in the asylums had to fight tirelessly for their liberty after being deemed insane. When I take this stigma into account and correlate it back to Dr. Jekyll, I think he was avoiding the stigma of being portrayed as mentally unwell (since he wanted to commit heinous acts) by splitting his personality into two. According to Helen Briggs once more, “Doctors treating the mentally ill were not called psychiatrists but were known as alienists, based on the belief that the self had become alienated from itself.” I think there is a clear correlation between Robert Louis Stevenson’s personality disorder and the stigma around mental health that his society was facing at this time.
However, from my understanding of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde… one character is not trying to battle two personalities. Rather, Dr. Jekyll still wanted to preserve his impressive societal position as a scientist but still live on the edge through Mr. Hyde. Obviously this is only possible in the realm of fiction, but it is fascinating if one imagines it to be real. This is a transformation Dr. Jekyll did succeed in making, but clearly, it ended in disastrous consequences when his transformations into Mr. Hyde started happening against his volition. Looking at this through a philosophical sense think this is a metaphor for the fact that unbridled evil always has the capacity to overcome true goodness.
<b>Works Cited</b>
Briggs, Helen. “Inconvenient People: A Victorian View of Mental-health Treatment.” BBC News, 29 Apr. 2014, www.bbc.com/news/health-27148737.
Herman, Claire. “Robert Louis Stevenson’s Split Personality.” NPR, 27 Nov. 2005, www.npr.org/2005/11/27/5028500/robert-louis-stevensons-split-personality.
Stevenson, Robert Louis, 1850-1894. The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
London: English Library, 1974.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicide, Murder, and Violence
burdiebird's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Alcohol, Death, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Suicide, Child abuse, Drug abuse, Addiction, and Mental illness