Scan barcode
jyaremchuk's review against another edition
4.0
Not Renko, not Russia, just as good as those! Well-researched, yet not in a show-off way, very well-written.
heritage's review against another edition
4.0
I've read all seven of Martin Cruz Smith's "Arkady Renko" novels and most of his others, and I've enjoyed most of them. While this isn't an "Arkady Renko" novel, Rose is easily up there with the best of Smith's novels, with perhaps the exception of Gorky Park; it's THAT good. The story, set in England in 1872, is about the attempts of a disgraced mining engineer (Jonathan Blair), recently returned from Africa, as he tries to fight malaria and deal with his tarnished reputation while accepting the only form of employment available: locate a missing curate (John Maypole) who was engaged to Lord/Bishop Hannay's daughter in the coal mining town of Wigan.
For those new to Smith's writing, his narrative seems spare if you quickly flip through the pages, but it is packed with vast quantities of well-researched detail and commentary on the social situation of the time and place, as well as insightful character development. His writing is never limited to the mundane "he said/she said, he did/she did" style, nor is it an action-packed "run for one's life" stinker, which seems to plague so many mysteries and thrillers. And, I don't think his dialogue has ever been better: characters exchange smooth and witty banter, veiled threats, open hostility, all with a very stylized and unique flow.
The history is very fascinating, and he paints the town and coal mines vividly. There is a great deal of information about the methods and techniques employed during the times that should appeal to any history buff, even garnering the praise of the late Patrick O'Brian. As a good historical novel should do, Rose teaches us about the times, and gives us a feeling of progression from then until now. We learn about working conditions, social stigmas, attitudes, women's rights, and in such a way that makes us look at our own values today to see where we still need to go.
The plot, once fully revealed, is quite ingenious with a satisfying twist for the end--no small feat given how many writers try and fail. Even the romance, which I originally thought was merely formulaic, actually had a purpose to the story. Although not a character novel per se, the characters were real, believable and unique, never feeling contrived solely for the purpose of the scene. Rose and Charlotte, Blair and Maypole: each different, yet having parallells. And the title, in hindsight, is...well, perfect.
This one, like his others, is a well-written mystery, the kind of which I'd like to find more of. It treats the readers with respect, gives them somthing to think about, and provides escapism and enjoyment. A must read for his existing fans, and something for those disatisfied with what's out there.
For those new to Smith's writing, his narrative seems spare if you quickly flip through the pages, but it is packed with vast quantities of well-researched detail and commentary on the social situation of the time and place, as well as insightful character development. His writing is never limited to the mundane "he said/she said, he did/she did" style, nor is it an action-packed "run for one's life" stinker, which seems to plague so many mysteries and thrillers. And, I don't think his dialogue has ever been better: characters exchange smooth and witty banter, veiled threats, open hostility, all with a very stylized and unique flow.
The history is very fascinating, and he paints the town and coal mines vividly. There is a great deal of information about the methods and techniques employed during the times that should appeal to any history buff, even garnering the praise of the late Patrick O'Brian. As a good historical novel should do, Rose teaches us about the times, and gives us a feeling of progression from then until now. We learn about working conditions, social stigmas, attitudes, women's rights, and in such a way that makes us look at our own values today to see where we still need to go.
The plot, once fully revealed, is quite ingenious with a satisfying twist for the end--no small feat given how many writers try and fail. Even the romance, which I originally thought was merely formulaic, actually had a purpose to the story. Although not a character novel per se, the characters were real, believable and unique, never feeling contrived solely for the purpose of the scene. Rose and Charlotte, Blair and Maypole: each different, yet having parallells. And the title, in hindsight, is...well, perfect.
This one, like his others, is a well-written mystery, the kind of which I'd like to find more of. It treats the readers with respect, gives them somthing to think about, and provides escapism and enjoyment. A must read for his existing fans, and something for those disatisfied with what's out there.
beardedandbookulent's review against another edition
1.0
So bad I couldn't finish...Perhaps it's just not my genre, but I couldn't even make it through the first chapter. I had to restart the first chapter 4 times and even after I really tried to concentrate I just couldn't grasp what Smith was talking about. I normally don't give up a book this early on, but I could just tell it wasn't for me.
jefecarpenter's review
2.0
This is a peculiar novel, outside of the writer's usual terrain, but it starts off with some interesting characters and a wonderfully detailed claustrophobia of the English mining town. He does know how to write, and it has some sparks along the way, including a subtly addictive love affair with the equivalent of a femme fatale crossed with a tomboy. But it's vamping along through most of the midsection, losing its way just to keep the love affair going, and by 80% through, it careens off the rails in an embarrassing turn.
I tossed it.
Too bad... I miss you, Rose.
I tossed it.
Too bad... I miss you, Rose.
carynjd13's review against another edition
5.0
Totally unlike his Arkady Renko books set in the USSR and Russia, this book is set in 1870's England. However, like the Renko books, this is a great tale full of interesting social commentary, accurate historical details, a great love story and a completely surprising twist. Overall, I really enjoyed this book, and I see why it was a NY Times Bestseller for 1996.
meaghan_clay's review against another edition
3.0
Not bad. After the first few paragraphs I almost put the book down but my boss lent me this one and I was determined to try to finish it. Thankfully the writing got better throughout, especially Cruz's descriptions of the coal mines, or "pits", which is what my boss really admired about the story. The mystery was decent, too. And now I can get back to Steinbeck's short stories.
jeremyhornik's review against another edition
2.0
The tagline for this book could be, "I can't tell you white women apart."
Well researched, with a strong sense of time and place. Interesting main character. Allllmost believeable twist. Cardboard villains.
Well researched, with a strong sense of time and place. Interesting main character. Allllmost believeable twist. Cardboard villains.
arkansas_equestrian's review against another edition
2.0
Learned some interesting facts about coal mining industry.
hayesstw's review
3.0
I've read several books by [a:Martin Cruz Smith|8258|Martin Cruz Smith|https://d.gr-assets.com/authors/1252590168p2/8258.jpg], all whodunits featuring detective Arkady Renko, mostly set in Moscow in the late 20th or early 21st century. This one is different, as it is set in 19th-century England, in Lancashire, in the mining town of Wigan, to be precise.
Some of the Renko books felt a bit surreal to me, but no more so than Bulgakov's [b:The master and Margarita|76103|The Master and Margarita (Modern Plays)|Edward Kemp|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1328732397s/76103.jpg|42061234], but this one felt a bit more jarring. I've been to Moscow, and I've never been to Wigan, but somehow the Wigan setting seemed less authentic than the Moscow ones, not so much the place itself, as the people in it. The story was interesting enough, and made me want to read on to see what happened, but it somehow felt inauthentic, as if it was set in some alternative universe, like [a:Philip Pullman|3618|Philip Pullman|https://d.gr-assets.com/authors/1396622492p2/3618.jpg]'s [b:His dark materials|18116|His Dark Materials (His Dark Materials #1-3)|Philip Pullman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1432839709s/18116.jpg|1943518].
The descriptions of coal mining were authentic, but it was the events and conversations on the surface that seemed out of place. A coal miner in Lancashire in 1872 likening something to a volcano? How many of them would have seen a volcano, or even a picture of one?
A zealous Evangelical clergyman speaking of Low Mass, or any kind of "Mass" at all? Such a thing would have been anathema to any Church of England Evangelical in that period. It's a bit like Pullman's use of terms like "Magisterium", which clearly means something different in an alternative universe.
One is left wondering whether the surrealism is intended or not. The protagonist too is a bit surreal, an Indiana Jones-like character, but some of the other things in the book give the impression that it is intended to be a historical novel, authentic in time and place. It feels like 20th-century characters transported into a 19th-centry setting.
Some of the Renko books felt a bit surreal to me, but no more so than Bulgakov's [b:The master and Margarita|76103|The Master and Margarita (Modern Plays)|Edward Kemp|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1328732397s/76103.jpg|42061234], but this one felt a bit more jarring. I've been to Moscow, and I've never been to Wigan, but somehow the Wigan setting seemed less authentic than the Moscow ones, not so much the place itself, as the people in it. The story was interesting enough, and made me want to read on to see what happened, but it somehow felt inauthentic, as if it was set in some alternative universe, like [a:Philip Pullman|3618|Philip Pullman|https://d.gr-assets.com/authors/1396622492p2/3618.jpg]'s [b:His dark materials|18116|His Dark Materials (His Dark Materials #1-3)|Philip Pullman|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1432839709s/18116.jpg|1943518].
The descriptions of coal mining were authentic, but it was the events and conversations on the surface that seemed out of place. A coal miner in Lancashire in 1872 likening something to a volcano? How many of them would have seen a volcano, or even a picture of one?
A zealous Evangelical clergyman speaking of Low Mass, or any kind of "Mass" at all? Such a thing would have been anathema to any Church of England Evangelical in that period. It's a bit like Pullman's use of terms like "Magisterium", which clearly means something different in an alternative universe.
One is left wondering whether the surrealism is intended or not. The protagonist too is a bit surreal, an Indiana Jones-like character, but some of the other things in the book give the impression that it is intended to be a historical novel, authentic in time and place. It feels like 20th-century characters transported into a 19th-centry setting.
pauliiiii's review
adventurous
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
A Martin C.S. fan through and through approves this!
I love the Arkady Renko series, and I think I've read most of Cruz's books now. This one stands out because it's set in mid-19th century England - so random for him!
Anyway, this was a good read and I actually liked it because I didn't see the ending coming. The plot twist was classic Cruz and it wasn't obvious which is what I liked. Usually, these books are all the same, and mysteries can get so repetitive.
I really liked this one and if you're on the market for a very well written mystery from an author who has the confidence to not use the thesaurus in every sentence, pick this up.