Reviews

The Apocalypse of Elena Mendoza by Shaun David Hutchinson

giulay's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

"We do the best we can with the knowledge we’re given and hope we don’t fuck it all up too badly."

TW: suicide, depression, alcohol abuse, physical abuse, bullying.

Unpopular Opinion Time 🐸☕️

Actual rating: 2.5 ⭐️

I am torn.

1. This book was both underwhelming and overwhelming.
2. It was both unique and repetitive
3. It was both predictable and unpredictable
4. It was both over the top and realistic

Basically, I don’t know how to rate this book. (of course you see the rating so, in the end I did know how to rate this damn book but follow my stream of consciousness, okay?)

This book was so clearly [a:Shaun David Hutchinson|3130410|Shaun David Hutchinson|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1387295428p2/3130410.jpg] it wasn’t even funny.
And what do I mean by that?
I mean that, if you’ve read [b:We Are the Ants|23677341|We Are the Ants|Shaun David Hutchinson|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1425574151s/23677341.jpg|43285034] or [b:At the Edge of the Universe|28763240|At the Edge of the Universe|Shaun David Hutchinson|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1463790854s/28763240.jpg|48954372], you know that he has a very specific, very unique voice.
You know that he mixes up science and literature in a way that nobody else does - and nobody else is able to do; he’s the Master™️ in that department and he’d better fucking know it.

And yet, this book was so much his style it felt like a carbon copy of his previous works.
I know, it’s paradoxical, right? I love his writing style, the way he tells the story, how he beautifully mixes science, humanity and space. And yet, I’m dragging this book specifically because it was too much his writing style, because it was too much his way of story-telling; I’m dragging it because it was too much centered around his typical topics.
Now, do you understand why I’m torn?

I loved this book but I was also underwhelmed by it.
It was something spectacularly new but it was also something that I’ve already read.
It felt too similar to his other works while being a complete unique and never-told-before story.

More specifically, I think the main problem - if we can call it that - is that the plot is kinda always the same throughout his works. It’s his comfort zone and it’s the zone in which he thrives and blossoms but, after a while (i.e. three books), this zone is just too well-known.
In fact, Elena Mendoza, too, has make a choice wether or not to save the world; she too has to decide if the world is worth saving, if humanity is worth saving. Sounds familiar? Well, yes: it’s the same premise of [b:We Are the Ants|23677341|We Are the Ants|Shaun David Hutchinson|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1425574151s/23677341.jpg|43285034] 😅
I don’t mean that I didn’t like the plot (I seriously enjoyed it since…you know…I enjoyed We are the Ants) or that I don’t think that wondering about humanity and what is worth living (or dying) for are not thought-provoking problems but I just thought it was a copy-paste of that book and everything’s starting to become repetitive.
This book is splendid in its own ways but it was also painfully similar to his other novels :/

To be more precise, I thought that the characters and the representation in this book were incredible. Different religious beliefs, sexualities, races, mental illnesses were smoothly depicted, introduced and addressed in this book and I liked it 👌🏻
The characters and their dynamics were messy and human and REAL.
I adored how important family was to Elena. And I also particularly appreciated the fact that the family was a relevant topic in the book. So many YA have non-existent, invisible families so to give all the attention to the main character’s actions… Well, this book did not inscribe itself in that trope and I really liked that.

Another thing I utterly loved was the magnificent friendship between Elena and Fadil. Theirs was a pure and strong friendship: they fought, they argued, they trusted each other and communicated. Theirs was a strong and real depiction of friendships. It was glorious.

On the other hand, though, I hated the love interest.
To me she sounded very much like a manic pixie dream (or should I say nightmare) girl. I understood her struggles and her doubts but that didn’t excused her shitty behaviour towards Elena. She was mean and sometimes I felt she acted like a bully and…I was not a fan of it. She was over the top and kind of a bitch, honestly.
So I was not really rooting for them to end up together and I personally think this book would have been just as strong without the romance.

So, to conclude.
Do I love Shaun David Hutchinson and his writing style with every fiber of my being and will I read each and every single one of his future works? Hell to the yes.
Am I slightly disappointed in this book and am I hoping that he’s gonna change things up a bit in his next novel? Also yes. Because I really wanna see what else he’s able to write apart from “re-tellings” of [b:We Are the Ants|23677341|We Are the Ants|Shaun David Hutchinson|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1425574151s/23677341.jpg|43285034]. Gimme something new, dude. There’s a fat chance I’ll love it.

"The moment we forget that even the evil among us are still human is the moment we forget that even the most human among us are capable of evil."

amandawije's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I had no idea where this book was going even at the end, which was something I loved. I wish we got some more answers but overall, really enjoyed this.

scythefranz's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It's kind of frustrating to not have a choice to know the truth, contrary to what this book is preaching.

beths0103's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

2019 Walden finalist

bee_hensh's review against another edition

Go to review page

Title: The Apocalypse of Elena Mendoza
Author: Shaun David Hutchinson
Publication: 2018
Difficulty Level: 1/5
My Rating: 3.5/5

Elena doesn't want to be the Miracle Girl, but when she accidentally starts the apocalypse--at a Starbucks no less--she has to figure out who's worth saving and why any of it matters at all.
I bought this book on a whim and I was taken in right from the first page. Hutchinson gives Elena a witty, relateable voice that draws you in. From her thoughts on cleaning espresso machine steam wands, to her irritation at the voices in her head (literally) are all delivered with the same normalcy one might expect in some other contemporary novel. But this isn't some other contemporary novel. This is something filled to the brim with existential crisis, identity crisis, and every other kind of crisis you could possibly throw at a teenager.
I found Hutchinson's treatment of sexuality refreshing and uplifting. It was nice to see many different queer and questioning characters alongside one another in a perfectly normal situation (if you ignore the whole end-of-the-world-thing). It was also comforting for this representation to exist without the entire story having to be about that. Finally, I found it showed an at least somewhat accurate reflection of modern teenage views on gender and sexuality that I haven't seen often without it feeling forced. It's easy to forget how open gen z and millenials are about those things when books about and for them are written by older generations. So one point to Hutchison, there.
Another reason this book felt so modern is the diversity (of sexuality, gender, religion, and ethnicity) it presented. Elena's questioning of the voices that speak to her is constantly in conversation with her best friend Fadil's faith and belief in Allah. Many characters give their two-cents on higher beings, humanity's existence, fate, and religious beliefs, and none of it cancels out what anyone else says.
Although I enjoyed the contrast of normal school life and the coming apocalypse, I found it frustrating at moments just waiting for a decision to be made. Elena spends much of the novel trying to figure out what to do about all this responsibility she's been given, and though her progress to this discovery is roadblocked by other, more pressing matters, the story feels like it backtracks and stalls, waiting for the plot to catch up with character development.
The writing is clean and easy to follow. There were dozens of quotable moments and sections that made me cry. Other than the stalling middle, there isn't much I can fault this book for. If you're looking for something semi-light, current (there's plenty of Trump-related content), and just generally different (something's got to be said about the premise here), I would highly recommend this book, if only because of the hilarious opening scene (seriously, how did Hutchinson transcribe my exact thoughts while I'm working into Elena's mind?).

mattressy's review against another edition

Go to review page

not feeling it, also first person

venti's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

was this just an extended starbucks ad? 

whoaitslei's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I'm honestly not sure why this book took me so long to read as I thoroughly enjoyed it. I love Hutchinson's writing style and I love how he ends his novels. They aren't perfect with a bow on top but they at least show happiness for the characters which is all I really ask for. I loved Elena and her friendships/relationships. All in all it was a very enjoyable read.

abbypneal's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

if you like your books to beat you over the head repeatedly with their theme this ones for you

mattie_mo's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0