Reviews

Temps futurs by Aldous Huxley

vampyrrhic's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

lookhome's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

A seemingly rushed and arguably lazy book filled with interesting ideas about a dystopian future. Huxley moved to hollywood and wrote quite a few scripts at one point in his career, this novel seems less a novel but a way of him getting something published that the studios wouldn't touch...

jennlcollier's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective

4.0

roxanamalinachirila's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Two guys from Hollywood are talking about... stuff. One of them is the first-person narrator, the other is a guy who's gotten a mistress despite the fact that he didn't really want one, and now he's in trouble with his wife.

I'm making it sound way more interesting than it actually is. I spaced out while reading some of their discussion, which was about Gandhi getting murdered and the nature of marxism and fascism and politics and whatever.

In the middle of the philosophy, I shut the book and read the summary on the back - "In February 2108, the New Zealand Rediscovery Expedition reaches California at last. It is over a century since the world was devastated by nuclear war, but the blight of radioactivity and disease still gnaws away at the survivors." Yeah, no relation to what I was reading. I had the weird feeling the book's cover had been replaced, you know?

So, as the two Hollywood guys walk around, a truck filled with manuscripts headed for the incinerator takes a sudden turn and three scripts fall out. Two are declared to be crap, one is read by the two friends, who go in search of the mysterious writer, but find out that he died a few weeks before and has no family, but his neighbors piece together a short history of the guy, which... whatever.

And then the script is reproduced in its entirety - and, well, to be honest, no wonder it was heading to the incinerator.

It starts with SYMBOLISM!!!! and baboons who act like humans and who have Albert Einsiteins on leashes, making them create weapons which let them destroy the world. Very symbol, much wow. More spacing out on my side, I had to re-read some of this stuff.

Later on, New Zealanders go off to explore the world, since they're the only ones who apparently escaped the nuclear war because nobody cared much about them (go, New Zealand!). They land in America, somewhere next to L.A., and one of the characters, a botanist, is captured by a tribe of genetically mutated people who have extra fingers, toes and pairs of nipples, who have mating seasons, and who are dead-set on worshiping the devil, seeing him as a cause of the world's destruction.

I'm making this sound interesting again. It's all very symbolic and philosophical and the priests keep explaining how the devil convinced humanity to self-destruct.

So the New Zealand dude gets left behind by his colleagues, falls in love with one of the natives and runs off with her in search of a colony of other humans, because the devil-worshipers hate people who have sex out of mating season.

Symbolism, poking fun at humanity, philosophising about the world, more poetry thrown everywhere, more random words your eyes will skip over, and less fun than "Brave New World".

urikastov's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

In the bleak irradiated landscape of Los Angeles 2108, survivors of the "Thing" struggle to contain the animalistic temptations within. Religion is turned on its head but has it really changed all that much? Populations are horrifically oppressed, but is it really different from what is and has occurred? Rich in symbolism and philosophy... so be sure to have an encyclopedia handy, but well worth the return.

signal's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A

3.0

1zzyleach's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0

jelina's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

While full of sharp and witty images and commentary, the plot and characters are rough caricatures for the narrator briefly examine and dismiss. The dialogue and set up doesn't particularly shine nor is the romance particularly compelling. It is mercifully short and Huxley has a mastery of the English language best seen in his other work. If this isn't your first time reading Huxley then by all means look to the others for entertainment if it is Belial has you by the horns.

megusa98's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25

jelina's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

While full of sharp and witty images and commentary, the plot and characters are rough caricatures for the narrator briefly examine and dismiss. The dialogue and set up doesn't particularly shine nor is the romance particularly compelling. It is mercifully short and Huxley has a mastery of the English language best seen in his other work. If this isn't your first time reading Huxley then by all means look to the others for entertainment if it is Belial has you by the horns.