Scan barcode
purplejumping's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Gun violence
Moderate: Emotional abuse and Murder
emma_reards's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Moderate: Death, Gun violence, Mental illness, Violence, and Murder
kelly_e's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Author: Matthew Quick
Genre: Magical Realism
Rating: 4.00
Pub Date: November 1, 2022
T H R E E • W O R D S
Powerful • Challenging • Haunting
📖 S Y N O P S I S
Lucas Goodgame lives in Majestic, Pennsylvania, a quaint suburb that has been torn apart by a recent tragedy. Everyone in Majestic sees Lucas as a hero—everyone, that is, except Lucas himself. Insisting that his deceased wife, Darcy, visits him every night in the form of an angel, Lucas spends his time writing letters to his former Jungian analyst, Karl. It is only when Eli, an eighteen-year-old young man whom the community has ostracized, begins camping out in Lucas’s backyard that an unlikely alliance takes shape and the two embark on a journey to heal their neighbors and, most importantly, themselves.
💭 T H O U G H T S
The premise, including themes of grief and the magical realism aspects, were what drew me to pick up We Are the Light. I also never realized it was written by the same author as The Silver Linings Playbook until I was finished.
Told through a series of letters from the main character to his therapist, Matthew Quick employs a clever writing style to explore grief, mental health, tragedy and the trauma that follows, community and hope. The letters are at times endearing, other times comical, and often sad. Lucas' character is easy to connect and relate to - some of his inner thoughts and dialogue were all too real, especially the idea of survivour's guilt.
What I appreciated most is the open dialogue on therapy and struggle in the face of the unthinkable. The narrative took me on an emotional roller coaster. While there was room for more depth and the epistolary style could be confusing to come readers, it is the ending alone that made this a 4-star read. It is an ending for the age, the type that makes you believe in humanity and tears were shed.
We Are the Light certainly treads into heavy content, but more specifically the aftermath of an unthinkable tragedy and coming out the other side as best you can. It does a fantastic job presenting human fragility, yet I was left feeling hopeful when I turned the final page. I will definitely be reading more from Matthew Quick.
📚 R E A D • I F • Y O U • L I K E
• unlikely friendships
• mental illness representation
• epistolary novels
⚠️ CW: death, partner death, gun violence, murder, mass/school shooting, suicide, suicidal thoughts, grief, mental illness, depression, panic attacks/disorders, self harm, child abuse
🔖 F A V O U R I T E • Q U O T E S
"And there is perhaps no greater pain than the suffering that comes from speaking plainly but failing to make any sort of meaningful connection with the people who care about you."
Graphic: Death, Gun violence, Mental illness, Suicide, Violence, Grief, and Mass/school shootings
Moderate: Child abuse, Panic attacks/disorders, Self harm, and Suicidal thoughts
partner death, depressionlisettemarie's review
2.0
Moderate: Death, Gun violence, Grief, Mass/school shootings, and Murder
livlosiewicz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
•the book tackles important topics (massacre, trauma) and generates interesting discussion
•I thought the ending was well-done and provides a nice perspective on trauma and its impact
•It’s short, pretty interesting, and doesn’t have a lot of dead space
Cons:
•the ending does provide context that helps this, BUT the premise of this book is that the main character is stalking his former analyst (apparently this is different from a therapist). The cops have told him to stay away. It was really hard for me to root for Lucas even if I empathized with him. Could Lucas have just written the letters and not sent them??
•In addition to his stalking, Lucas was a really annoying narrator. He was childish to the point where I wondering if he had some sort of neurodevelopmental or neurocognitive disability? Did he? I don’t think so? I think this was because of the trauma, and I get that, but this combined with the stalking made it hard for me to be in Lucas’s corner
•Why did the relationship between Lucas and Jill have to be romantic? Did we need that? Whyyyy?
•It was weird how everything came together so perfectly. Wow these movie theater owners in a tiny tiny town happen to have all of these amazing film connects! Was that not a little too weird?
•Maybe this is my own fault for picking up a book that heavily features Jungian analysis, but I did not appreciate Lucas’s digs on cognitive behavioral therapy. It may not work for everyone but hi it’s the gold standard let’s not universally knock it!! That is harmful!!
Recommendation: This is an epistolary novel about a really heavy subject matter that has some nice hopeful notes as well. I recommend to people who don’t mind heavy books/appreciate reading about explorations of trauma. I thought the trauma in this book was generally purposeful, which I can appreciate. It also didn’t like, wreck my soul to read (probably because I couldn’t relate to the narrator), but you can’t pretend it’s not heavy. There’s additionally a mysterious element that I liked. My biggest issue was that I found the narrator really unlikable. This is certainly partially colored by my experience as a therapist and identifying with the analyst he is sort of stalking, so I imagine others could move past that, but at the end of the day, he was still sort of annoying. So avoid if that will bother you or if the heaviness of the subject matter will be too much!
Graphic: Gun violence and Mental illness
Minor: Suicide
olheckerd's review
3.5
Graphic: Child abuse, Death, Gun violence, Mental illness, Self harm, and Suicide
czoltak's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Gun violence, Suicide, and Mass/school shootings
Moderate: Child abuse, Death, Mental illness, and Panic attacks/disorders
cmklaft's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Child abuse, Death, Emotional abuse, Gun violence, Mental illness, Suicide, Blood, Grief, Mass/school shootings, and Murder
ulviyyask's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Death, Gun violence, Blood, Grief, Mass/school shootings, and Murder
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders and Suicide
Minor: Suicidal thoughts, Forced institutionalization, and Stalking
nbaker83's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Gun violence, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Self harm, Suicide, Violence, Blood, Grief, Mass/school shootings, and Murder