Reviews with content warning for Injury/Injury detail - The Cloisters

Reviews tagging 'Injury/Injury detail'

The Cloisters by Katy Hays

8 reviews

abiyy's review against another edition

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

I’ll admit that I wasn’t initially sold. Especially in the beginning, the plot is a bit slow and the character exposition feels onerous. But it lays critical groundwork for a spectacularly told story that leans into how the choices we make shape our path. The characters are complex and you truly come to understand their motivations and desires. I was surprised by some of the plot twists later on, except also not at all because wow they made SO much sense. Reading the final few chapters felt like finishing a puzzle and realizing you’ve got pieces in the wrong spots but now seeing where they actually go.

Content Warnings

gracescanlon's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

This just didn’t hit for me.

Strike one: The story was odd, as was the main character. Also, the narrative voice continually switched from conversational to more lofty prose, often from one sentence to the next and back again. Many of the more conversational ones were actually dependent clauses, which brought the immediate shift in tone from literary fiction-esque sentences to non-sentences into even sharper contrast.

Strike two: The book touched on issues around those who grew up with money and those who didn’t, but didn’t delve deeply into them. This was fine, actually, as the MC idolized the old-money characters for most of it. However, her shift in opinion of those types of characters neglected to address topics like entitlement and never knowing financial struggle or hardship. She did, however, shift her thinking on theft from such people. So to see one side of her opinion about the “haves and have-nots” change, but not the other (at least not on the page), rang insincere.

Strike three: The entire book was so predictable that when it met the tired tropes and twists without deviation, I was truly in disbelief — disbelief that anyone could be that unoriginal.

Content Warnings

lizzym126's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Content Warnings

giulianalb99's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? N/A
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Content Warnings

aseel_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

Everything but the actual plot, was such a vibe. The writing style was easy to read, I loved the aesthetic of the cloisters, the tarot card research, I even liked the ending (it fits with the ruthlessness of academia) but the plot was lacking?? Barely anything actually happened and I felt like it had the potential to do so

Content Warnings

just_one_more_paige's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

This was an ALC from Libro.fm, which is what had me picking it up so quickly, if I'm being honest. But also, after I read that it was tarot cards and divination...that had me fully interested in seeing what it was all about more deeply. Because I have a weird soft spot for books with that kind of focus. Samantha Shannon's Bone Season series an obvious fav, and Steifvater's The Raven Cycle is also great. I even love when it shows up in supporting roles, like in H.E. Edgmon's The Fae Keeper, or when it is other forms of divination, like astrology in Written in the Stars or the variety of weirder things (like haruspex) in my absolute fav This is How You Lose the Time War. So anyways, the point is, I was interested in this story.

Ann Stilwell leaves her small town in Washington state for a summer internship with the Met in NYC, only to discover that there's been a mix-up and she is now going to be working at the Cloisters, a gothic Renaissance museum and garden. Either way, she gets to stay in the city, so she jumps in. Within days, she is pulled into a small group of mysterious and passionate researchers: the curator, Patrick, and his assistant, Rachel, as well as the gardener, Leo. Patrick is convinced that there is more truth to tarot than we've previously believed, and that finding (up until now) hidden histories of tarot decks/readings will unlock the secrets of actual future-telling. Ann may or may not believe quite that much, but she is all too happy to leave her own troubled past behind and jump on board with some of the more questionable research choices the Cloisters employees are making. And as her personal and professional life with this small group of friends/coworkers gets ever more tangled, and the manipulations and secrets at work seem more and more oppressive, Ann finds herself in some really untenable positions.

My first impressions as I began reading this were definitely...iffy. The "woe is me/I’m hard done by" vibe from Ann that hits hard and fast at the beginning (not rich, not pretty, not useful or special) was not my favorite. Like, it was just really extreme. Now, as the story went, I could see how that feeling of inadequacy played into how she was so easily drawn into nefarious-ish things, and further in, how she justifies some of her choices and actions. So within the context of the story, I settled into it a little bit. And I generally do like an unlikable narrator, but this one grated extra on me for some reason. So if that's a "thing" for you too, be aware.

The creepy "something is off" feelings that unfolded throughout this novel, that are really a cornerstone of dark academia and gothic lit, are strong here. The vibes of the arcane and mysterious, the classic mix of desire, power, work/pursuit, and the occult/mysterious, are all over and (I felt) more or less pulled off well. Hayes smoothly writes tension into the descriptions of many normal everyday events and interactions, adding a high level of intensity and eeriness. In particular, the relationship between Ann and Rachel, as it developed had that unhealthy aspirational kind of aura, where Ann kind of was in love with and wanted to be Rachel at the same time, while Rachel sort of uncomfortably took Ann under her wing and "mentored" her in a way that isolated her from everything else. If you have read Tangerine or Magic for Liars, there were some very similar qualities. Their combined personalities and outlooks - the danger of wanting to believe something too badly, seeing suspiciousness everywhere, high level access/finances/entitlement, emotional instability (working through grief), *so much* ambition - really had me on the edge of my seat waiting for the other shoe to drop.

And drop it did! Interestingly, while some parts of the drop I did suspect or anticipate, other parts were a surprise. There were quite a few twists and reveals at the end, way more than I had expected. It explained a lot of things, and did really add some nice depth to the exploration of the primary push and pull theme: needing to believe in faith because the alternative can drive you crazy versus still retaining some level of power over your choices and future. I can see why Ann (and Rachel too, really) had constructed a belief in the hand of fate the way they had. And I kind of liked the low key (and sometimes high key) ruthlessness and mercilessness they showed. Although for some reasons that I cannot fully explain, I just didn't think that this book was as good as it could have been (or maybe as good as I was hoping it would be), there were a lot of really solid writing and thematic aspects throughout. I don't know, perhaps it just felt a little too formulaic for what it was supposed to be?

I have to end by saying that, even though my overall feelings about this book were more lukewarm than I would have hoped, the tarot and divination aspects were spot on and I loved all of that. The focus on "unpopular" Renaissance art and artists, and the way that was used to delve into the history of tarot, both as a game and as it became something more, as well as an introduction to a number of other popular (and somewhat creepy) divination methods of that time period, was fascinating. In addition, the combination of divination and fate and religious/belief, how they tied together and how historically people could justify believing in both, was really interesting. The way this too was connected with the philosophical discussions of fate and choice that Ann, Rachel, Patrick and Leo all grapple with (and manipulate) in the present day was really well done.

“Wasn’t that, after all, why we had become academics and researchers in the first place? To discover art as a practice, not just as an artifact?”

“We are, you see, both masters of our fate and at the mercy of the Moirai--the three Fates who weave our futures and cut them short. And while I still believe we can control the little things in life, those small decisions that add up to the everyday, I think, perhaps, the overall shape of our life is not ours to decide.”

Content Warnings

moonchild_cos's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75

Content Warnings

uranaishi's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark informative mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

Content Warnings

More...