foundeasily's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging mysterious reflective tense medium-paced

3.5

I could see myself returning to this and liking it more. The looseness of it made it difficult to key in on in this reading but I took some notable points away.

mistylloyd's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This was an incredibly quick and easy read, but it was packed with multiple great thoughts, and it is something I definitely see myself coming back to.

whosawer's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Interesting ideas of study as collective/individual knowledge developed through cooperation, discourse, collaboration. Policy as something done to others, an improper answer to inequality/injustice.

brainycap's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

quite good, not sure I understood most of it 

beepbeepbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Incredible... opaque.... this book opens the door to reassessment of the our world in every sense, the social with the material, the performative and the authoritative, the non individualised... I feel so strongly for this book I cannot express myself. To read again and again

ruarilpa's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

famously dense but some of the ideas I've returned to the most and keep cropping up in my thoughts are from this book - STUDY! DECOLONISE THE UNIVERSITY!

soafricane's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

It’s the plenitude of generative ideas and how they chafe against each other. I’d initially read the second chapter with peers in March but diving into the whole expanse of the Undercommons opened me up to a buoyant, mesmerizing exercise in the rigors of Black study.

dani_nzd's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective medium-paced

5.0

8amtrain's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

wanna think abt how moten's call to disorder suggests a more radical project/relation to each other than what scot nakagawa uses harmony to describe here https://www.racefiles.com/2015/08/21/on-solidarity-centering-anti-blackness-and-asian-americans/

suchsweetsorrow89's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

As someone who could do with reading more theory, this is such a good book. Refreshing, easy to read, and rather than making one argument, it allows for you to process your own thoughts with their own thoughts. It's like a conversation (it's like talking to an intellectual at a coffeeshop).