Scan barcode
theremightbecupcakes's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
This feels…complicated. It’s a reimagining of the Gospels by an atheist. Also by an amazing creative writer. You see the intense complexity.
Much of the book was, to use a rural Pentecostal phrase, “in the Word”. Then it all takes a dark, weird turn.
The author makes Jesus and Christ into twins, born on the same familiar night under the same miraculous star. Christ is visited by a stranger, who is never identified as human, angel, or demon, who tells him to document Jesus’ activity and words, and then to betray him in order to kickstart the Kingdom. Both their names will be known for all time, as it was meant to be.
I am an Episcopalian, so I don’t feel fundamentally uncomfortable with having had read this book as other Christians might. I love religious discourse of all kinds. But I didn’t like it. In some parts, it felt true to Jesus’ ministry, and even respectful and loving. In others, it seemed to claim that the Gospels were full of lying details (“there’s history, and then there’s the truth”), the truth nudged like clay to make things happen. In those parts, it felt…mocking, rather than creative or even exploring a historical theory. There was a sharp unpleasant turn in tone that surprised me.
Much of the book was, to use a rural Pentecostal phrase, “in the Word”. Then it all takes a dark, weird turn.
I am an Episcopalian, so I don’t feel fundamentally uncomfortable with having had read this book as other Christians might. I love religious discourse of all kinds. But I didn’t like it. In some parts, it felt true to Jesus’ ministry, and even respectful and loving. In others, it seemed to claim that the Gospels were full of lying details (“there’s history, and then there’s the truth”), the truth nudged like clay to make things happen. In those parts, it felt…mocking, rather than creative or even exploring a historical theory. There was a sharp unpleasant turn in tone that surprised me.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death and Vomit
More...