Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.65 AVERAGE
3.65 AVERAGE
adventurous
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
adventurous
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
slow-paced
Science vs Religion
"Science and Religion are trying to tell the same story just in different languages"
Dan Brown once again pits fanatical religion vs fanatical atheists. A prominent scientist is ready to reveal a scientific discovery he claims is going to change the world, shocking the human race but especially the devout. At the unveiling of the discovery, chaos ensues and Robert Langdon is pulled into a puzzles and conspiracy.
I loved this book. Classic Dan Brown. Almost all of this book is pro science but an argument is made for religion also. Look for the answer to this question. (Roman Numerals) XI + I = X. Is there anyway that statement is true? That puzzle was very interesting/profound to me.
Merged review:
Science vs Religion
"Science and Religion are trying to tell the same story just in different languages"
Dan Brown once again pits fanatical religion vs fanatical atheists. A prominent scientist is ready to reveal a scientific discovery he claims is going to change the world, shocking the human race but especially the devout. At the unveiling of the discovery, chaos ensues and Robert Langdon is pulled into a puzzles and conspiracy.
I loved this book. Classic Dan Brown. Almost all of this book is pro science but an argument is made for religion also. Look for the answer to this question. (Roman Numerals) XI + I = X. Is there anyway that statement is true? That puzzle was very interesting/profound to me.
Merged review:
Science vs Religion
"Science and Religion are trying to tell the same story just in different languages"
Dan Brown once again pits fanatical religion vs fanatical atheists. A prominent scientist is ready to reveal a scientific discovery he claims is going to change the world, shocking the human race but especially the devout. At the unveiling of the discovery, chaos ensues and Robert Langdon is pulled into a puzzles and conspiracy.
I loved this book. Classic Dan Brown. Almost all of this book is pro science but an argument is made for religion also. Look for the answer to this question. (Roman Numerals) XI + I = X. Is there anyway that statement is true? That puzzle was very interesting/profound to me.
"Science and Religion are trying to tell the same story just in different languages"
Dan Brown once again pits fanatical religion vs fanatical atheists. A prominent scientist is ready to reveal a scientific discovery he claims is going to change the world, shocking the human race but especially the devout. At the unveiling of the discovery, chaos ensues and Robert Langdon is pulled into a puzzles and conspiracy.
I loved this book. Classic Dan Brown. Almost all of this book is pro science but an argument is made for religion also. Look for the answer to this question. (Roman Numerals) XI + I = X. Is there anyway that statement is true? That puzzle was very interesting/profound to me.
Merged review:
Science vs Religion
"Science and Religion are trying to tell the same story just in different languages"
Dan Brown once again pits fanatical religion vs fanatical atheists. A prominent scientist is ready to reveal a scientific discovery he claims is going to change the world, shocking the human race but especially the devout. At the unveiling of the discovery, chaos ensues and Robert Langdon is pulled into a puzzles and conspiracy.
I loved this book. Classic Dan Brown. Almost all of this book is pro science but an argument is made for religion also. Look for the answer to this question. (Roman Numerals) XI + I = X. Is there anyway that statement is true? That puzzle was very interesting/profound to me.
Merged review:
Science vs Religion
"Science and Religion are trying to tell the same story just in different languages"
Dan Brown once again pits fanatical religion vs fanatical atheists. A prominent scientist is ready to reveal a scientific discovery he claims is going to change the world, shocking the human race but especially the devout. At the unveiling of the discovery, chaos ensues and Robert Langdon is pulled into a puzzles and conspiracy.
I loved this book. Classic Dan Brown. Almost all of this book is pro science but an argument is made for religion also. Look for the answer to this question. (Roman Numerals) XI + I = X. Is there anyway that statement is true? That puzzle was very interesting/profound to me.
Having read all Dan Brown's novels, one thing becomes clear: they are all the same. Especially the Robert Langdon novels are all made following the same recipe: Langdon finds himself in a life-or-death situation, thrown together with a beautiful women who has her own problems but who invariably likes Langdon. In this situation, he has to take action and solve puzzles to reveal a mystery important to all human kind. Along the way, we see a lot of artwork and travel to different places.
Because of this recurring recipe, most readers like the Brown book they have read first the best. For me, this was the Da Vinci Code. Origin is basically the light version of Da Vinci Code. It has all the ingredients, but the plot is less thick and the puzzles are less interesting and just less.
However, the novel still brings up interesting points and the art and architecture mentioned is always interesting and well done.
Merged review:
Having read all Dan Brown's novels, one thing becomes clear: they are all the same. Especially the Robert Langdon novels are all made following the same recipe: Langdon finds himself in a life-or-death situation, thrown together with a beautiful women who has her own problems but who invariably likes Langdon. In this situation, he has to take action and solve puzzles to reveal a mystery important to all human kind. Along the way, we see a lot of artwork and travel to different places.
Because of this recurring recipe, most readers like the Brown book they have read first the best. For me, this was the Da Vinci Code. Origin is basically the light version of Da Vinci Code. It has all the ingredients, but the plot is less thick and the puzzles are less interesting and just less.
However, the novel still brings up interesting points and the art and architecture mentioned is always interesting and well done.
Because of this recurring recipe, most readers like the Brown book they have read first the best. For me, this was the Da Vinci Code. Origin is basically the light version of Da Vinci Code. It has all the ingredients, but the plot is less thick and the puzzles are less interesting and just less.
However, the novel still brings up interesting points and the art and architecture mentioned is always interesting and well done.
Merged review:
Having read all Dan Brown's novels, one thing becomes clear: they are all the same. Especially the Robert Langdon novels are all made following the same recipe: Langdon finds himself in a life-or-death situation, thrown together with a beautiful women who has her own problems but who invariably likes Langdon. In this situation, he has to take action and solve puzzles to reveal a mystery important to all human kind. Along the way, we see a lot of artwork and travel to different places.
Because of this recurring recipe, most readers like the Brown book they have read first the best. For me, this was the Da Vinci Code. Origin is basically the light version of Da Vinci Code. It has all the ingredients, but the plot is less thick and the puzzles are less interesting and just less.
However, the novel still brings up interesting points and the art and architecture mentioned is always interesting and well done.
Jag tillhör den skaran som tycker väldigt mycket om Dan Browns sätt att skriva och den sortens böcker han gör. Det kan till stor del ha att göra med att jag är väldigt förtjust i både religion och historia och att jag gillar att läsa (och se) spännande saker på det här sättet.
Kritiken jag har läst har till viss del att göra att man vet vad man får av Brown, och det gör man absolut. Det är en väldigt framstående forskare som har kommit på något banbrytande, så klart känner han Robert Langdon som är med på ett hörn och helt plötsligt kastas ut i ett äventyr tillsammans med en vacker kvinna och så klart jagas Langdon också av diverse religiösa grupper och allt är otroligt on the edge och ganska overkligt och otroligt. Men det gör inget. Så här långt in i serien vet jag det här, och jag förväntar mig det också. Det är bland annat det jag verkligen gillar med Browns böcker.
Bäst gillar jag Langdon, han är så jordnära och verkar så mysig, och kunnig. Annars tycker jag väldigt mycket om Edmond Kirsch assistent Winston som är rolig och annorlunda och Ambra Vidal, kvinnan vid Langdons sida, som är väldigt stark i sig själv och sin personlighet. Persongalleriet tycker jag är lagom, men jag kan tänka mig att det kan vara svårt att hänga med i svängarna om man lyssnar på boken istället för att läsa den.
Jag ser fram emot Dan Browns nästa bok och blir sugen på att läsa alla de tidigare igen, och det är ju alltid ett bra betyg.
Kritiken jag har läst har till viss del att göra att man vet vad man får av Brown, och det gör man absolut. Det är en väldigt framstående forskare som har kommit på något banbrytande, så klart känner han Robert Langdon som är med på ett hörn och helt plötsligt kastas ut i ett äventyr tillsammans med en vacker kvinna och så klart jagas Langdon också av diverse religiösa grupper och allt är otroligt on the edge och ganska overkligt och otroligt. Men det gör inget. Så här långt in i serien vet jag det här, och jag förväntar mig det också. Det är bland annat det jag verkligen gillar med Browns böcker.
Bäst gillar jag Langdon, han är så jordnära och verkar så mysig, och kunnig. Annars tycker jag väldigt mycket om Edmond Kirsch assistent Winston som är rolig och annorlunda och Ambra Vidal, kvinnan vid Langdons sida, som är väldigt stark i sig själv och sin personlighet. Persongalleriet tycker jag är lagom, men jag kan tänka mig att det kan vara svårt att hänga med i svängarna om man lyssnar på boken istället för att läsa den.
Jag ser fram emot Dan Browns nästa bok och blir sugen på att läsa alla de tidigare igen, och det är ju alltid ett bra betyg.
adventurous
challenging
informative
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
adventurous
hopeful
informative
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
adventurous
emotional
inspiring
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No