overduck's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

3.0

Informative but ultimately pretty boring. I found the book to be really repetitive, and yet I still had several unanswered questions. I think, to its credit, part of what made it boring to me was that I was less interested by the segments on attachment styles that were not my own. I learned a lot, but I most likely wouldn't read it again.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

pjdotcom's review

Go to review page

challenging reflective

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

oliverreeds's review

Go to review page

reflective slow-paced

2.5

my thoughts: this book is for neurotypical, cis, straight people and not really for many others which is fine bc thats a lot of people but a lot of the language used just doesnt work for me. first the authors say: your partner isnt trying to make you feel bad! all attachment styles are valid. then they say actually anxious are trying to make you feel bad with protest behavior and avoidants are kind of shitty people who will never change. in fact, the only reliably healthy relationship is with a secure person whos willing to put up with if you yell at them! and dont forget its all bc they love you. like some of this was straight up like not condemning clearly abusive behavior? which was so confusing to me and also just like not a slay. the actual science and research portion was great, the self help part (didnt realize how self help this would be) not so much. inspiring for people whove had long series of failed relationships, parts interesting for ppl interested in psych, not much for anyone with any semblance of abnormal psych or dealing with abuse or having dealt with abuse in the past. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

zombiezami's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful informative reflective

4.0

This was a really helpful and approachable introduction to the topic of attachment styles. I understand my own attachment style better, and I can better understand why certain past relationships happened the way that they did. 

The book is rather heteronormative, though. Also, I feel like, by focusing on attachment styles as a sole cause of friction in relationships, they overlook when conflicts are a result of outright abuse, rather than incompatibility or different intimacy needs. The relationship with Craig in Chapter 10 strikes me as very verbally abusive, for example. 

I also wish that the authors had gone into more detail about the anxious-avoidant attachment style. Other than saying it was really rare, they didn't seem to give many (or any) examples of it. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

paolina's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

4.0

An interesting, logical way to view romantic relationships. Probably could use an updated edition to account for shifting patterns and more inclusivity.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...