Reviews

Anti-Semite and Jew by George J. Becker, Michael Walzer, Jean-Paul Sartre

justsimplehonestjuice's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This is a pretty good example of how philosophy and politics can come together to analyze contemporary issues. I must say that there isn't a clear explanation in this book as to how Sartre has observed what he analyzes. Sartre isn't Jewish and doesn't produce any testimonies or examples from the Jewish people he knew, so I'm wary of how he describes the thoughts and feelings of Jewish people. Still, I find this a really interesting application of his foundational idea of authenticity. It makes me intrigued to read more of his works.

aslanjade's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced

4.25

twistingsnake's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

The anti-Semite is afraid of discovering that the world is ill-contrived for then it would be necessary for him to invent and modify, with the result that man would be found to the master of his own destinies, burned by the agonizing and infinite responsibility.

Sharply relevant to today's political climate around hatred toward minority groups (immigration in particular) Sartre's pocket-sized thesis on what creates a social hive mind around the us vs. them ideology and provides smart commentary on the mindset of oppression and how it can inflict generational trauma with lasting effects on how people interact with their own individualism. I annotated the fuck out of this and after I lend it out to a few people I could see myself revisiting it. This is one of the first books someone recommended me for getting into Jewish theology/history and it absolutely lived up to expectations. There were many notable passages and a lot of profound insights/commentary that made rethink or reconceptualize a lot of my understanding of how to view racists and the mindset of someone who has to dehumanize another to feel safe in his own humanity. One part in particular that stood out was his commentary on social complacency toward members of the community who are loudly outspoken with their aversion to certain minority groups. "There was a tacit understanding between Jules and his family: they ostentatiously avoided talking about the English in front of him, and the precaution gave him a semblance of existence in the eyes of those about him at the same time that it provided them with the agreeable sense of participating in a sacred ceremony." which is a sentiment that, again, has great relevance today.

It took me over a month to read this book and even longer to annotate/research the climate and world powers that were central for France in the 40s but it was worth the grind and I couldn't recommend this swiss army knife of a social thesis more. 4 1/2 stars.

scherzo's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

30.6B Book/ author referenced
More...