Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.56 AVERAGE
3.56 AVERAGE
4-5 stars depending on how the rest of the trilogy goes.
so deep. so layered. so easy to read, surprisingly???
I read this in a synthesized form 6 years ago. not the actual play, but just the story itself. of course, at 14, my only obsession was that he kills his father & marries his mother. reading it was like an hour of "LOL HE DOESN'T KNOW. HE DOESN'T KNOW."
& now reading the original play & of course knowing how it turns out once again, it is very tragic. i don't think I've read a tragedy that's more tragic than oedipus' story.
and what's the lesson? don't try to escape your fate? don't seek the truth? don't get too cocky? I don't really know. there's a lot in here.
it was a surprisingly easy read considering it was a play. I associate all plays with Shakespeare I guess, which are difficult at best. Oedipus has 3-4 characters on stage at a time, it was super easy to get through. I finished in one day.
I feel a very strong personal connection to this story now... Fate catches up to everyone.
we'll see how the rest of the trilogy is.
so deep. so layered. so easy to read, surprisingly???
I read this in a synthesized form 6 years ago. not the actual play, but just the story itself. of course, at 14, my only obsession was that he kills his father & marries his mother. reading it was like an hour of "LOL HE DOESN'T KNOW. HE DOESN'T KNOW."
& now reading the original play & of course knowing how it turns out once again, it is very tragic. i don't think I've read a tragedy that's more tragic than oedipus' story.
and what's the lesson? don't try to escape your fate? don't seek the truth? don't get too cocky? I don't really know. there's a lot in here.
it was a surprisingly easy read considering it was a play. I associate all plays with Shakespeare I guess, which are difficult at best. Oedipus has 3-4 characters on stage at a time, it was super easy to get through. I finished in one day.
I feel a very strong personal connection to this story now... Fate catches up to everyone.
we'll see how the rest of the trilogy is.
I’d forgotten about the sassiness of Tiresias. Love him!
One has to wonder why a work of this nature is worshipped so commonly in the literature scene. Perhaps it is derivative of the Harold Bloom literary scene we currently inhabit, favoring antiquated, simplistic works over the more developed works of the last 400 years. There are multiple problems with the work, mostly with the logic around its production, but what is most striking about its form is how lifeless and gutted it all feels. In a modern era, perhaps this story could be reworked and beneficially convoluted, as to lend some emotional depth to its characters, but what Oedipus Rex represents is a mix of shallow morality and simplistic characters, all of which, combined with its ancient prose, land this book firmly in the territory of mediocrity.
The plot goes as follows: A man, after arguing with multiple friends, finds out that he accidently married his mother and killed his father, and, out of deep despair, slashes his eyes open and abandons his children.
The firmest reason I could find for its inclusion in the western canon was how it featured one of the earliest representations of the tragic hero, but this may be the only quality that one could state for the book. In my opinion, the tragic hero, as with the hero's journey, is just something perceived from everyday life. It's seen all the time, and Sophocles certainly didn't come up with the idea, so on this front the book can be discredited. I haven't been able to find any other reasons other than 'historical value', which irks me on end; The Odyssey is still a fairly enjoyable and well-written read alongside being of significant historical value.
Besides not providing much of a point to reading it, what did I think ofOedipus? Nothing. When I read this in ninth grade, I was supposed to discuss it for a week with 3 other people and there was so little to discuss that we finished in 2 days, and I finished my essay before I was even supposed to start writing it. The book's fame is beyond me, and not in an 'I hate all classics' way; Tom Jones, Jane Eyre, Macbeth, Faulkner? I could give plenty of reasons to read any of those, besides just be objectively great books. There are so many phenomenal books out there, masterpieces left unread, hidden gems left uncovered. This is not one of them; Don't waste your time with it. Needless to say, this play would be better off classified as one of the lesser pieces of classical antiquity.
Null/5.
(1 star for utter mediocrity).
The plot goes as follows: A man, after arguing with multiple friends, finds out that he accidently married his mother and killed his father, and, out of deep despair, slashes his eyes open and abandons his children.
The firmest reason I could find for its inclusion in the western canon was how it featured one of the earliest representations of the tragic hero, but this may be the only quality that one could state for the book. In my opinion, the tragic hero, as with the hero's journey, is just something perceived from everyday life. It's seen all the time, and Sophocles certainly didn't come up with the idea, so on this front the book can be discredited. I haven't been able to find any other reasons other than 'historical value', which irks me on end; The Odyssey is still a fairly enjoyable and well-written read alongside being of significant historical value.
Besides not providing much of a point to reading it, what did I think ofOedipus? Nothing. When I read this in ninth grade, I was supposed to discuss it for a week with 3 other people and there was so little to discuss that we finished in 2 days, and I finished my essay before I was even supposed to start writing it. The book's fame is beyond me, and not in an 'I hate all classics' way; Tom Jones, Jane Eyre, Macbeth, Faulkner? I could give plenty of reasons to read any of those, besides just be objectively great books. There are so many phenomenal books out there, masterpieces left unread, hidden gems left uncovered. This is not one of them; Don't waste your time with it. Needless to say, this play would be better off classified as one of the lesser pieces of classical antiquity.
Null/5.
(1 star for utter mediocrity).
Read this aloud (in the park) with Amy and LOVED IT!
This book makes me proud to be part Greek because it’s so clever. The dramatic irony is unreal.
“...golden brooches, which the King snatched out and thrust into his eyes - eyes that should no longer see his shame, his guilt...”
A masterpiece!
A masterpiece!
dark
reflective
tense
fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
This is the first Ancient Greek play I have ever read so I do not have much to compare it to but I really enjoyed reading it. (I read the Robert Fagles translation which is just so readable and beautiful! Definitely recommend that translation- it read like something that could have been written today.)
I really enjoyed the premise and the theme of the play - can we escape our faith and how much do we actually know about ourselves and the world around us. I can't say that I fully got into the story - mostly because I think the story would have been much more powerful if seen as an actual play (as it was meant to be enjoyed).
I really enjoyed the premise and the theme of the play - can we escape our faith and how much do we actually know about ourselves and the world around us. I can't say that I fully got into the story - mostly because I think the story would have been much more powerful if seen as an actual play (as it was meant to be enjoyed).