Scan barcode
skelleybean's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
This book was so dark and raw, and I loved it all… until it tripped at the finish line and kind of turned into an after school special.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore, Injury/Injury detail, Misogyny, Death, Death of parent, Physical abuse, Violence, Animal death, Body horror, Murder, Animal cruelty, and Blood
Moderate: Sexual assault, Fire/Fire injury, Domestic abuse, Adult/minor relationship, Grief, Infidelity, Misogyny, Confinement, and Pandemic/Epidemic
ladydianna1600's review against another edition
dark
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
This book started out rather slow for me, and to be honest, if I were not listening to an audiobook, I would have DNF'd it. As it were, sometimes when I started the audiobook up again after the previous day, I thought maybe I missed part of it but then I rewound and realized I hadn't. I just wasn't that interested in remembering what happened. The plot picked up, however, about half way through, and I was more invested. It was an overall enjoyable read but not sure I was really invested in any of the characters other than HATING the prophet, but that is because that character reminds me so much of religious leaders in our "church" who I grew up with. I haven't decided if I will read the second book yet. I have so many other things on my TBR to get through first.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Miscarriage, Animal cruelty, Blood, and Misogyny
Moderate: Sexual assault
legs_n_chins's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
I really, really wanted to like this book, but unfortunately it failed to engage me and the things I found lacking ended up far outweighing the things I really enjoyed. I came very close to DNF-ing multiple times. But I wanted to see it through to the end and the horror elements were solid enough that I wanted more of that.
Tl;dr: Main character suffers too much from Main Character Syndrome and too much of the story felt spoon-fed. Messaging was muddled. But horror elements held up through the end and atmosphere was appropriately dark.
The writing was technically solid. Henderson can set a scene well and creates a solid atmosphere. I felt the pacing was steady, quick to get from one part to the next without falling stagnant. However, the author also fell very heavily into the trap of telling, not showing. Many things that we were told occurred or things we were told the mc was thinking would’ve been more impactful if we had any basis of textual evidence for these statements. I also felt that information was spoon fed to the audience far too often, almost to the point that I felt condescended to. Some of the revelations, for example, that come toward the end that seem shocking to the mc shouldn’t have been shocking at all, as we seemed to have dwelled on this information for a long time prior.
I did really enjoy some parts of this book. The tension of the climax was excellent and the elements of nature and darkness were utilized well. I like the horror aspect, the constant haunting that seemed to dog our steps as the story progressed. The plagues were creative and helped continually raise the stakes through the narrative. And the way Henderson envisioned the witches, Lilith especially, was really incredible. I loved the image of the witches and the sinister otherworldliness of them.
Unfortunately, the rest of the book fell short of my expectations. Maybe I’m judging to harshly because of that, but I felt that the characters were shallow and relationships hollow. Some scenes between characters I felt were undeserved, the relationship not built enough for me to grasp the emotion the author was trying to convey. The mc never convinced me of her motivation or strength of character, and far too often it felt like she was in a bad quest epic where the most significant steps she took in her own narrative were to decide who to ask for help and when. And then in those cases she seemed to receive answers or aid without any significant obstacle. I could really overdo the word count on some examples, but this is already getting long and my main gripe is more significant.
I was confused by the commentary or message this book was attempting to impart. I’ll admit I can be dense about these things, and maybe I was told to expect something different that what this was intended to be, but this was billed to me as a dark fantasy wrapped around an intersectional feminist narrative. As a female-presenting poc myself, I was eager to see how Henderson would dig into this, but like everything else it felt rather shallow. The message I believe I could see here was that the patriarchal system seeks to make monsters of us all and turn women against each other to keep the structure in place. Which is all well and good, but I was hoping the narrative would allow for a breaking of that and give the women a chance to be allies with each other. Minor end spoilers:I suppose it did at the end, but like everything else it felt undeserved as up until that moment everyone had turned their back on the mc . More significant end spoiler: And, in the end, one of the final decisions made by the mc is in service to the saving of a man. A love interest I felt was unnecessary, eschewing the previously established motivation of saving the whole town.
There was also a part toward the middle of the book where the mc, a biracial woman, seeks to connect with her Black heritage and the time spent on that subplot was unfortunately brief. I’m biracial myself, I recognized some of what the author was saying here, but it still felt too surface-level because I didn’t feel the mc had a clear enough through-line of deep desire to make these connections. Though she expressed feelings of being an outsider in her own family, I wasn’t convinced of her consistent motivation to find the piece that was missing.
All in all, I was hoping for more depth and found it lacking. I may have been blinded by my own expectations and, unable to shake them, let my disappointment color my potential enjoyment of the book. But, I stand by my own critiques.
Tl;dr: Main character suffers too much from Main Character Syndrome and too much of the story felt spoon-fed. Messaging was muddled. But horror elements held up through the end and atmosphere was appropriately dark.
The writing was technically solid. Henderson can set a scene well and creates a solid atmosphere. I felt the pacing was steady, quick to get from one part to the next without falling stagnant. However, the author also fell very heavily into the trap of telling, not showing. Many things that we were told occurred or things we were told the mc was thinking would’ve been more impactful if we had any basis of textual evidence for these statements. I also felt that information was spoon fed to the audience far too often, almost to the point that I felt condescended to. Some of the revelations, for example, that come toward the end that seem shocking to the mc shouldn’t have been shocking at all, as we seemed to have dwelled on this information for a long time prior.
I did really enjoy some parts of this book. The tension of the climax was excellent and the elements of nature and darkness were utilized well. I like the horror aspect, the constant haunting that seemed to dog our steps as the story progressed. The plagues were creative and helped continually raise the stakes through the narrative. And the way Henderson envisioned the witches, Lilith especially, was really incredible. I loved the image of the witches and the sinister otherworldliness of them.
Unfortunately, the rest of the book fell short of my expectations. Maybe I’m judging to harshly because of that, but I felt that the characters were shallow and relationships hollow. Some scenes between characters I felt were undeserved, the relationship not built enough for me to grasp the emotion the author was trying to convey. The mc never convinced me of her motivation or strength of character, and far too often it felt like she was in a bad quest epic where the most significant steps she took in her own narrative were to decide who to ask for help and when. And then in those cases she seemed to receive answers or aid without any significant obstacle. I could really overdo the word count on some examples, but this is already getting long and my main gripe is more significant.
I was confused by the commentary or message this book was attempting to impart. I’ll admit I can be dense about these things, and maybe I was told to expect something different that what this was intended to be, but this was billed to me as a dark fantasy wrapped around an intersectional feminist narrative. As a female-presenting poc myself, I was eager to see how Henderson would dig into this, but like everything else it felt rather shallow. The message I believe I could see here was that the patriarchal system seeks to make monsters of us all and turn women against each other to keep the structure in place. Which is all well and good, but I was hoping the narrative would allow for a breaking of that and give the women a chance to be allies with each other. Minor end spoilers:
There was also a part toward the middle of the book where the mc, a biracial woman, seeks to connect with her Black heritage and the time spent on that subplot was unfortunately brief. I’m biracial myself, I recognized some of what the author was saying here, but it still felt too surface-level because I didn’t feel the mc had a clear enough through-line of deep desire to make these connections. Though she expressed feelings of being an outsider in her own family, I wasn’t convinced of her consistent motivation to find the piece that was missing.
All in all, I was hoping for more depth and found it lacking. I may have been blinded by my own expectations and, unable to shake them, let my disappointment color my potential enjoyment of the book. But, I stand by my own critiques.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Pregnancy, Gore, Blood, Religious bigotry, and Animal cruelty
Moderate: Domestic abuse and Sexual assault
Minor: Pedophilia and Incest
albon's review against another edition
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship, Racism, Animal death, Rape, and Animal cruelty
hngisreading's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Blood, Animal death, Pregnancy, Child death, Death, Death of parent, Gore, Racism, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Pedophilia and Sexual assault
bunnypez's review against another edition
DNF
The animal abuse early in made me sick to my stomach. I wasn't enjoying reading this at all and it made me anxious and feel sick. Not going to read something that makes me feel that way.
The animal abuse early in made me sick to my stomach. I wasn't enjoying reading this at all and it made me anxious and feel sick. Not going to read something that makes me feel that way.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal cruelty and Animal death
louisegraveyard's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore, Religious bigotry, Rape, Pedophilia, Violence, Torture, Racism, Death of parent, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child death, Death, and Misogyny
emily_journals's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Ok, first off, the premise of this book is so intriguing to me. I was so invested in the premise and first 2/3 of this book, but the last 1/3 of this book really missed the mark for me. Without going into too much detail, the second guessing of the town and church's true motives is built up throughout the whole first 2/3 of the book, and then kind of abandoned and not truly fulfilled at the end of the book. Overall, this book was just really disappointing to me. When I picked it up, I was so excited and eager to dig down to the bottom of the mystery and learning about all these secrets towards the beginning of the book was so exciting, but the resolution was such a let down on all of the points the book seemed to be attempting to make.
Ok, now for some spoiler specific review comments to explain the above points:
1.) So, the entire beginning of the book was all about how Immanuelle was sort of discovering these issues and prejudices within the church, and also her discovering the "true story" behind the origins of Bethel and the story of the three witches. The beginning of this book was really building up how the men who run this town were not good people, and would deliberately hurt women and people with less power who tried to stand up against them, and applying that to the witches, BUT THEN you discover that the witches really were just completely evil and wanted to kill everyone and are still trying to destroy the town and EVERYONE in it (not just the manipulative men), which almost entirely negates the point that this book seems to be trying to make.
2.) The mom issue was never resolved. Immanuelle's mom supposedly was consorting with these three witch spirits to curse the entire town (not just the people who caused all of her pain). Immanuelle goes through all of these steps and discoveries that her mom essentially used her as a conduit to bring the curse to the town (which is also why only Immanuelle can stop it), and that her mom left Immanuelle to just become only this thing to carry the curse. However, when Immanuelle goes and finds her grandma (dad's mom) who left Bethel, she says that Immanuelle's mom was so over protective of Immanuelle even before she was born, and how excited she was to have her baby and how she would never reduce Immanuelle to essentially an object to carry out the curse. But this thread is never resolved. It just is left dangling, and the only resolution we get is that Immanuelle's mom really did just use Immanuelle to deliver this curse? Which again, reduces the point this book is making by having this woman who is betrayed and hurt by all the men in power in Bethel reduce her own child to an object (which is what this book seems to be trying to protest, the objectification of women and how the men of Bethel think that they can do whatever they want with these women).
3.) There is kind of a "white savior" ending. Not fully, but there are little bits and pieces of it with the love interest (white boy) saving Immanuelle multiple times at the end, so that she can then save the town. I don't think it's a full white savior, but the fact that he needed to save Immanuelle at all was a little irksome, as it is proven throughout the whole book that Immanuelle is very capable on her own, so I thought it was a little frustrating that the author did this when we, the audience, know it's not needed.
Ok, now for some spoiler specific review comments to explain the above points:
2.) The mom issue was never resolved. Immanuelle's mom supposedly was consorting with these three witch spirits to curse the entire town (not just the people who caused all of her pain). Immanuelle goes through all of these steps and discoveries that her mom essentially used her as a conduit to bring the curse to the town (which is also why only Immanuelle can stop it), and that her mom left Immanuelle to just become only this thing to carry the curse. However, when Immanuelle goes and finds her grandma (dad's mom) who left Bethel, she says that Immanuelle's mom was so over protective of Immanuelle even before she was born, and how excited she was to have her baby and how she would never reduce Immanuelle to essentially an object to carry out the curse. But this thread is never resolved. It just is left dangling, and the only resolution we get is that Immanuelle's mom really did just use Immanuelle to deliver this curse? Which again, reduces the point this book is making by having this woman who is betrayed and hurt by all the men in power in Bethel reduce her own child to an object (which is what this book seems to be trying to protest, the objectification of women and how the men of Bethel think that they can do whatever they want with these women).
3.) There is kind of a "white savior" ending. Not fully, but there are little bits and pieces of it with the love interest (white boy) saving Immanuelle multiple times at the end, so that she can then save the town. I don't think it's a full white savior, but the fact that he needed to save Immanuelle at all was a little irksome, as it is proven throughout the whole book that Immanuelle is very capable on her own, so I thought it was a little frustrating that the author did this when we, the audience, know it's not needed.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore, Adult/minor relationship, Body horror, Religious bigotry, Sexism, Sexual violence, Death, Racism, Torture, Violence, Blood, Injury/Injury detail, Sexual content, Sexual harassment, and Sexual assault
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Pregnancy, Fire/Fire injury, Abandonment, Animal death, and Domestic abuse
Minor: Death of parent
poisoned_icecream's review against another edition
dark
emotional
hopeful
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Animal cruelty, and Misogyny
Moderate: Pregnancy
Minor: Rape
kaseybereading's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Gore, Religious bigotry, Animal death, Animal cruelty, Death, Medical trauma, Rape, and Adult/minor relationship