Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.64 AVERAGE
3.64 AVERAGE
challenging
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Intriguing and enlightening thoughts on the future of technology, the approach of singularity and the inevitable decisions humanity will have to make as we continue to expand and reach for the stars.
Question: I'm a few chapters in to this book, and realize ... I've read the story before. Does anyone know if this is based on a previously published short story or novella by Brin?
While Brin does not fall into the use your most successful baby and build around it he does not completely abandon it either. It is there, a little, not much but enough to bring a smile to a fans face.
Existenceis not your average SF novel. It is about so many things and that makes it complex. Time moves along in a linear fashion but holds gaps, twists and turns. Gaps that are not always filled in later. There are storylines that are abandoned but give some sign of life later. It is as if David Brin leaves doors open to explore at a later date. Some story lines that seem abandoned do come back in unexpected ways. It is not easy to hold together or to get into as so much is happening. It does help if you are familiar with his other books and writing style. What I love about it is that it surprises and engages your own fantasy. You end up thinking with the characters to what the solution brings. Nothing is straight forward and yet it is. In that respect it has a certain mystery novel flair to it too.
It simply starts with that what humanity is known for; a massive dose of curiosity when something new is found (in space). And also seeking the boundaries of our known universe. Looking at the stars, to boldly go as they say in Star Trek. But also that other thing we do so well. Complex plotting, scheming and how money talks. A bit mystery thrown in as mankind tries to find out what happened when their curiosity got the better of them, with the internet equivalent having a major role in it all. It is about space travel in a way. It is old fashioned hard SF mixed with a thriller and a great inquisitive journalist, drama and making your think. It is about alien life, but not in a classic sense. It is new and exciting and excessively hard to describe what it is about. I loved the end as it is open, it is exciting and has a huge massive feel.good factor.
Oh and the journalist has an interesting name Tor Povlov. I could not help but thinking; publisher is Tor Books, or is it is reference to (bit)torrents? Both seem possible. Povlov a spin on Ivan Pavlov I think. Pavlov is known for his work on classical conditioning. The book with its focus on known human interactions and in a way predictability would suggest this link IMO. I love the Pandora's Cornucopium. The Cornucopium seems reading as a cross between the Encyclopædia Britannica and a book of doom.
Now if you do not like hard SF don't start on this book. However if you do and if you like to be surprised and have the feeling of untangling a mystery this book is great. I closed it with a smile, but I can imagine that some people would find it too much and that it hold to many story lines that come together too late.
Update re-read 2021
Still a great book, but this time I feel cheated out of some of the most interesting players (autie and neanderthals) and their story line On a positive note Made me think again what does it mean to exist, what is existence and more; what is life and what is human And that remains for me the central point
Existenceis not your average SF novel. It is about so many things and that makes it complex. Time moves along in a linear fashion but holds gaps, twists and turns. Gaps that are not always filled in later. There are storylines that are abandoned but give some sign of life later. It is as if David Brin leaves doors open to explore at a later date. Some story lines that seem abandoned do come back in unexpected ways. It is not easy to hold together or to get into as so much is happening. It does help if you are familiar with his other books and writing style. What I love about it is that it surprises and engages your own fantasy. You end up thinking with the characters to what the solution brings. Nothing is straight forward and yet it is. In that respect it has a certain mystery novel flair to it too.
It simply starts with that what humanity is known for; a massive dose of curiosity when something new is found (in space). And also seeking the boundaries of our known universe. Looking at the stars, to boldly go as they say in Star Trek. But also that other thing we do so well. Complex plotting, scheming and how money talks. A bit mystery thrown in as mankind tries to find out what happened when their curiosity got the better of them, with the internet equivalent having a major role in it all. It is about space travel in a way. It is old fashioned hard SF mixed with a thriller and a great inquisitive journalist, drama and making your think. It is about alien life, but not in a classic sense. It is new and exciting and excessively hard to describe what it is about. I loved the end as it is open, it is exciting and has a huge massive feel.good factor.
Oh and the journalist has an interesting name Tor Povlov. I could not help but thinking; publisher is Tor Books, or is it is reference to (bit)torrents? Both seem possible. Povlov a spin on Ivan Pavlov I think. Pavlov is known for his work on classical conditioning. The book with its focus on known human interactions and in a way predictability would suggest this link IMO. I love the Pandora's Cornucopium. The Cornucopium seems reading as a cross between the Encyclopædia Britannica and a book of doom.
Now if you do not like hard SF don't start on this book. However if you do and if you like to be surprised and have the feeling of untangling a mystery this book is great. I closed it with a smile, but I can imagine that some people would find it too much and that it hold to many story lines that come together too late.
Update re-read 2021
Still a great book, but this time I feel cheated out of some of the most interesting players (autie and neanderthals) and their story line On a positive note Made me think again what does it mean to exist, what is existence and more; what is life and what is human And that remains for me the central point
I wanted to like this book because I am a Brin fan, but I could not get immersed in it. I did not connect with any of the characters so I didn't care what happened to them (with the possible exception of Peng Xiang Bin); they seemed to be there to serve the plot more than anything.
I believe this is the sort of novel that people might be thinking of when they suggest science fiction is ideas heavy but character and/or plot light. I'd never really understood that accusation of modern SF... until now. (I would have given it 3.5 if I could.)
It took me more than a fortnight to finish reading this. For fewer than 550 pages, that's... well, for me that's positively an age. I did consider giving up on it, several times in fact. But the ideas kept me coming back and made me determined to see it through, to see what Brin did with this sprawling, messy saga. And I think I'm glad that I did. Not absolutely positive, but probably.
Anyway, let me first talk about the positives. There are some really, really awesome ideas here. The basic premise that drives the plot is a first-contact one, but done in a fairly unusual way: a crystal snatched from orbit, activated by human touch and sunlight, that appears to contain alien life of some sort. The unfolding drama of the knowledge revealed - and how it changes, or at least develops, over time - and how humanity deals with it is a genuinely fascinating take on Fermi and all the other variations on "where are the aliens, what will they do when they get here, and how will we respond?" That's the plot, boiled down to its essentials; and it was fairly intriguing.
Also intriguing was the world Brin set this alien contact against. If there's a clear explanation of when this is occurring I missed it, but it seems to start only a few decades from now. Complete climate collapse has not occurred but is still very much on the cards; technology has continued to advance in leaps and bounds, towards smart-specs and similar toys imagined by cyberpunk so many decades ago but which still seem elusive in 2012; AI appears to have been achieved, along with other technological wizardry. I liked that there appeared to be variety in this world, in how people dealt with technology at least. I did not especially like the world itself, though - although this is not in itself one of the novel's negatives. The world is not quite dysfunctional enough to be a dystopia - although that would perversely probably have been easier to read. Instead this is a world apparently divided into ten Estates not just determined by wealth but by allegiance to such abstracts as Science and The Media; a world where inequality is as, if not more, entrenched than today, with apparently few people acting against it, and added fears of technology on the one hand and the 'Autism Plague' on the other; frankly, a world that I hope does not come to pass. From an objective point of view, this is a fairly well-described world, although I am unconvinced of its realism.
The novel's structure is linear chronologically and inconsistent in perspective. Numerous characters act as the focus over the 550 pages: the most prominent are a novelist, a journalist, a society lady, an astronaut, and a peasant. There are also excerpts of such non-plot devices as books and talk shows thrown in, which generally works. These different perspectives serve to give just that, of course - different perspectives on the world and on the events unfolding. Over the course of the novel, there was only one character that I particularly liked, and who did manage to get a word in for the entire length of the novel: the journalist, Tor. She had a fun role to play as the inquisitive, poking-nose-in type, despite various problems hampering her abilities.
This brings me to one of the problems in this novel - two, actually. One is the characters. Most of them weren't necessarily unlikeable so much as they were unapproachable or uninteresting. Additionally there were a few characters who promised to be or do quite interesting things who just... disappeared. Their narrative stopped popping up, occasionally with little or no resolution to their particular quandary or arc. This was intensely frustrating. This is definitely not a novel for those who prefer their story to be character driven.
The second problem was the structure itself. It was often unclear, at the opening of a new section, exactly who was speaking or where the events were happening. Sometimes that was cleared up, and at other times it was left opaque and mysterious. And sometimes these mysteries resolved with later revelations, but there are still some bits that don't seem to fit in at all, and really that just seems like a waste of words and my time.
Thirdly, there's the world itself. I felt like Frank Poole, the dead astronaut who wakes up at the start of 3001: The Final Odyssey to find it's a millennium later, and suffers a fair amount of culture shock. Now I love cyberpunk and far future stuff, so culture shock isn't necessarily an unpleasant experience for me. But here, it just made me tired, and irritable. A new piece of technology? Cue eye-rolling and mutters of 'really? more?' - because it seems to be set in the near future (as someone one said, near future is within the reviewer's lifetime), and therefore improbable. The technology may not have been so overwhelming, though, if it wasn't for the language. Brin has messed with a lot of language to indicate how heavily reliant this version of the future is on computers, frequently turning 'a's into 'ai': aissistant, for example; or adding 'v', as in virtisement; or even combining both in vraiffiti. Add in a whole bunch of gobbledy acronyms (tsoosu=to see ourselves as other see us=viewing yourself through one of the innumerable cams in place in this world; hello, panopticon Big Brother), and I simply found it overwhelming.
Overall, then, this is a big-ideas novel that is let down by two-dimensional characterisation and what occasionally feels like deliberately obfuscating language.
It took me more than a fortnight to finish reading this. For fewer than 550 pages, that's... well, for me that's positively an age. I did consider giving up on it, several times in fact. But the ideas kept me coming back and made me determined to see it through, to see what Brin did with this sprawling, messy saga. And I think I'm glad that I did. Not absolutely positive, but probably.
Anyway, let me first talk about the positives. There are some really, really awesome ideas here. The basic premise that drives the plot is a first-contact one, but done in a fairly unusual way: a crystal snatched from orbit, activated by human touch and sunlight, that appears to contain alien life of some sort. The unfolding drama of the knowledge revealed - and how it changes, or at least develops, over time - and how humanity deals with it is a genuinely fascinating take on Fermi and all the other variations on "where are the aliens, what will they do when they get here, and how will we respond?" That's the plot, boiled down to its essentials; and it was fairly intriguing.
Also intriguing was the world Brin set this alien contact against. If there's a clear explanation of when this is occurring I missed it, but it seems to start only a few decades from now. Complete climate collapse has not occurred but is still very much on the cards; technology has continued to advance in leaps and bounds, towards smart-specs and similar toys imagined by cyberpunk so many decades ago but which still seem elusive in 2012; AI appears to have been achieved, along with other technological wizardry. I liked that there appeared to be variety in this world, in how people dealt with technology at least. I did not especially like the world itself, though - although this is not in itself one of the novel's negatives. The world is not quite dysfunctional enough to be a dystopia - although that would perversely probably have been easier to read. Instead this is a world apparently divided into ten Estates not just determined by wealth but by allegiance to such abstracts as Science and The Media; a world where inequality is as, if not more, entrenched than today, with apparently few people acting against it, and added fears of technology on the one hand and the 'Autism Plague' on the other; frankly, a world that I hope does not come to pass. From an objective point of view, this is a fairly well-described world, although I am unconvinced of its realism.
The novel's structure is linear chronologically and inconsistent in perspective. Numerous characters act as the focus over the 550 pages: the most prominent are a novelist, a journalist, a society lady, an astronaut, and a peasant. There are also excerpts of such non-plot devices as books and talk shows thrown in, which generally works. These different perspectives serve to give just that, of course - different perspectives on the world and on the events unfolding. Over the course of the novel, there was only one character that I particularly liked, and who did manage to get a word in for the entire length of the novel: the journalist, Tor. She had a fun role to play as the inquisitive, poking-nose-in type, despite various problems hampering her abilities.
This brings me to one of the problems in this novel - two, actually. One is the characters. Most of them weren't necessarily unlikeable so much as they were unapproachable or uninteresting. Additionally there were a few characters who promised to be or do quite interesting things who just... disappeared. Their narrative stopped popping up, occasionally with little or no resolution to their particular quandary or arc. This was intensely frustrating. This is definitely not a novel for those who prefer their story to be character driven.
The second problem was the structure itself. It was often unclear, at the opening of a new section, exactly who was speaking or where the events were happening. Sometimes that was cleared up, and at other times it was left opaque and mysterious. And sometimes these mysteries resolved with later revelations, but there are still some bits that don't seem to fit in at all, and really that just seems like a waste of words and my time.
Thirdly, there's the world itself. I felt like Frank Poole, the dead astronaut who wakes up at the start of 3001: The Final Odyssey to find it's a millennium later, and suffers a fair amount of culture shock. Now I love cyberpunk and far future stuff, so culture shock isn't necessarily an unpleasant experience for me. But here, it just made me tired, and irritable. A new piece of technology? Cue eye-rolling and mutters of 'really? more?' - because it seems to be set in the near future (as someone one said, near future is within the reviewer's lifetime), and therefore improbable. The technology may not have been so overwhelming, though, if it wasn't for the language. Brin has messed with a lot of language to indicate how heavily reliant this version of the future is on computers, frequently turning 'a's into 'ai': aissistant, for example; or adding 'v', as in virtisement; or even combining both in vraiffiti. Add in a whole bunch of gobbledy acronyms (tsoosu=to see ourselves as other see us=viewing yourself through one of the innumerable cams in place in this world; hello, panopticon Big Brother), and I simply found it overwhelming.
Overall, then, this is a big-ideas novel that is let down by two-dimensional characterisation and what occasionally feels like deliberately obfuscating language.
I hate to give a bad review to a good author, but this one is tedious and repetitive, and leaves many threads unresolved, though not in a way that demands a sequel.