Scan barcode
bclark8781's review against another edition
2.0
Well, I didn't really think much of this book, it reads more like a term paper than any kind of compelling narrative. I don't think it's particularly well written. The (mostly) well-known examples of these disasters all pretty much follow a similar path:
1. Pressure from governments or business competitiveness lead to shortcuts in design, safety features, training etc;
2. A problem occurs that either should have been anticipated or was anticipated but due to poor training, design, shoddy materials, or human error, is not appropriately dealt with;
3. Businesses and (especially) governments are desperate to conceal the causes and (especially) severity of the crises;
Stir, mix, and repeat.
I think this might have been a better book had the author not treated each accident in its own chapter and instead done a more macro look at the problems with nuclear power and delved into the particulars of each incident together, comparing, for example, design flaws or construction short cuts together.
I also think the fact that many of these disasters have had their own books (in the cases of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, many different books) written leaves one with the feeling that "Atoms and Ashes" is almost a Cliff's Notes version, and it leaves the reader unmoved. It is mostly too dry. For example, not that long ago I read "Midnight in Chernobyl" which was an unbelievable work or research and an edge-of-your-seat thriller as well as an absolutely gripping polemic. THAT book was terrifying. This book, despite the author's best intentions, was yawn-inducing.
1. Pressure from governments or business competitiveness lead to shortcuts in design, safety features, training etc;
2. A problem occurs that either should have been anticipated or was anticipated but due to poor training, design, shoddy materials, or human error, is not appropriately dealt with;
3. Businesses and (especially) governments are desperate to conceal the causes and (especially) severity of the crises;
Stir, mix, and repeat.
I think this might have been a better book had the author not treated each accident in its own chapter and instead done a more macro look at the problems with nuclear power and delved into the particulars of each incident together, comparing, for example, design flaws or construction short cuts together.
I also think the fact that many of these disasters have had their own books (in the cases of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, many different books) written leaves one with the feeling that "Atoms and Ashes" is almost a Cliff's Notes version, and it leaves the reader unmoved. It is mostly too dry. For example, not that long ago I read "Midnight in Chernobyl" which was an unbelievable work or research and an edge-of-your-seat thriller as well as an absolutely gripping polemic. THAT book was terrifying. This book, despite the author's best intentions, was yawn-inducing.
schopflin's review against another edition
medium-paced
5.0
Absolutely excellent follow-up to the same author's Chernobyl. I am actually breathtaken to realise the risks taken in the post-war era, mostly for the sake of technological peacocking. Plokhiy tells the stories of the better-known disasters with the same fingertip-tension that he brought to his Chernobyl. His afterword is interesting. He is even-handed on the need for nuclear to take us away from fossil fuels and reduce carbon emissions. But I think he makes clear that the world is too politically unstable for something as dangerous as nuclear tractors to exist at all. But that's my take.
paukinra's review against another edition
dark
informative
fast-paced
4.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Colonisation
Minor: Cancer, Terminal illness, and War
hauntedorchid's review against another edition
5.0
After watching the Chernobyl miniseries, I was interested to learn more of the facts about the disaster, but in particular I wanted to put it in some kind of context: how did it compare to any other disaster before or since. It just so happened that this book was about to be published in paperback and was exactly what I was looking for, so I preordered. I was not disappointed. Not only is this a thorough, highly readable account of six nuclear disasters through history, it also puts these events into context in relation to history, politics and each other. It is very revealing in terms of how disasters (nuclear or otherwise) can occur because of and be exacerbated not just by technological factors but also human error, politics and company culture. I thought this would be a somewhat niche topic, but in fact it feels like an essential read and I’m glad I picked it up, despite how terrifying it is.