Reviews tagging 'Injury/Injury detail'

Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë

48 reviews

aprillikestoread's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

directorpurry's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Most of my thoughts are better suited to a series of academic literary analysis/research papers, so I'll do my best to cut those. I will also attempt to ease the other side that might just turn into heated keyboard smashing.

I forgot how much I enjoy this book. I really did. The first time I read Jane Eyre was in high school. And then in college I read Wide Sargasso Sea (and hated it, but that's for another review). But this reading left a much stronger impression on me, both of the negatives and the positives.
The pacing of this novel can be questionable. Far too much time is spent following Jane through Lowood School, and similarly on her love for the Rivers siblings. Many of the characters are quite dislikable - Rochester is rude and sometimes scary, St. John Rivers is straight up abusive by our standards, and Helen Burns is annoyingly preachy and almost disgustingly pious. Another critique from a modern perspective, but I forgot about the religious aspect, which was a personal annoyance as a non-Christian. There was also a fair amount of casual racism and anti-Semitism, a hallmark of the time period.
But I found I didn't care. The writing of Jane Eyre is some of the most gorgeous prose I've read in a while. It flows wonderfully and heatedly. Rochester's speech before Jane leaves is probably my favorite passage in the novel because the words are so wonderful.

The Brönte sisters are (somewhat) well-known for their hatred of Jane Austen. Although I won't be doing the full comparison I might wish to do, I couldn't help but think about the similarities of the two writers, having just finished Pride and Prejudice last week (again). Even as they go about their message in opposite ways, there are definitely some very similar themes. They even equally mark certain character quirks for the reader's inspection. I'll leave those thoughts unfinished for the time being (but HMU if you want to talk Brönte/Austen discourse lol) but there is certainly more to say on the subject.

I love Jane Eyre. Until Rochester entered the page I thought this would be a 3 star read, because I had forgotten so much of the prose. 
If I'm being entirely honest, it would harm no one if when attempting to read this for pleasure, you skim up until Jane enters Thornfield, which is where the real power of the writing begins.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mondovertigo's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mme_carton's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cornustella's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nerdkitten's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

traa's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

caidyn's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

This is a hard book to rate. It's a classic that inspired so much. But I also think it's so dumb. Mr. Rochester is gross and creepy and not a good guy. But, whatever. Still a good story.

DNF at page 302

My second attempt didn't go so well. The first time I read this, I gave it 4/5 and you can read my review below. This time, I couldn't get through it. It was so annoying and I just... I couldn't. Not my kind of book in the least.

Original review:

Coming into this book, my only knowledge was what I kind of remembered from watching one of the movie adaptations. And, I spaced out halfway through it, so I didn't remember much at all. The basic plot, and that was it.

Happily, I found that this was not like [b:Wuthering Heights|6185|Wuthering Heights|Emily Brontë|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1388212715l/6185._SY75_.jpg|1565818], a book that I did not like too much as a whole. Yes, there was an asshole of a man who was supposed to be attractive. Yes, there was one woman who was insane.

But the comparisons end there.

Overall, I liked Jane as a character. She was resourceful, strong, and witty. I liked the relationship between her and Rochester because they were a match for each other. Of course, there were bits about Jane I didn't like. Personally, I didn't like that she went back to Rochester in the end, although he had become a dynamic character (aka wasn't as much of a shit). I also didn't like how much she put out that self-hate. Seriously, there was one passage in the book I cringed through as she drew herself to compare herself to a description of a woman she had never met... all for a guy.

Rochester was a dick. But, he was a good match for Jane. Out of all the trials she'd gone through in her life, he was a pretty easy one to handle. He just should realize next time to never hide the fact that he's married when he's out courting behind his wife's back.

St. John deserves a comment as well. He was a dick, too. A different type of dick, but a dick nonetheless. Seriously? You want to marry someone so you can "mate" with them? That is how you word it? No wonder no one wants to marry you and you die alone.

For the plot, I realized about halfway through that this was going to be a long ending once the whole thing dwindled down and I remembered where it was going. It's a classic, though. What more can you expect?

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...