witwickan's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative inspiring reflective

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ruthhelizabeth's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative medium-paced

2.5

This book gave me a lot of food for thought as a White reader despite the flaws. Even the act of reading this book as a White left wing person trying to become an anti-racist was critiqued and challenged in the book. What was my motive? Did I improve my own self-image merely by reading? Would the only perspective I read be by a White author? This is part of a range of books about anti-racism I'm reading this year and I am also reading in a group for White people to become better anti-racist allies. I think that is a very good model for me to read it, but if I wasn't planning to discuss it, I think this book would also benefit from having more structured self-reflection questions. I also do question if it's a good use of time to prioritise reading about anti-racism from a book written by a White author rather than one written by someone who has the most lived experience - Black, Asian, Indigenous or other people from minority ethnic backgrounds. Another critique has been raised with the key concept of this book: is 'White fragility' the best chosen language when the reality is that the behaviours associated with it are not a type of fragility, they are a type of violence. Lots of food for thought here overall, but the book has it's weaknesses too, and I think I would prioritise a book by a Black, Asian, Indigenous or other minority ethnic person over this if I had had the choice.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...