Reviews

Hummingbird Salamander by Jeff VanderMeer

polkadotteapott's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

criedy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

mkbradley's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix

3.75

patchworkbunny's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

***Review copy provided by publisher*** I was a bit disappointed in Hummingbird Salamander, I really liked the idea of a cli-fi themed mystery to solve, starting with a hummingbird as a clue, but not enough other clues followed for me to feel like I knew what was going on. The reasoning for Silvina leaving the trail for “Jane” felt anti-climactic, followed by an ending that seemed disconnected to everything else. Not to mention I didn’t really understand anyone’s motivations for getting involved so far, not when so much was at risk.

Jane’s job is the first casualty as she uses the pretence of a new client to justify her digging into Silvina’s past. It didn’t make sense to me why her boss and colleagues accepted this. Is it normal to just pick a person and then do research on their dead daughter to get their business? I’d assumed Jane was in cyber security, but maybe it was more than that.

Then her colleagues are in danger, then her family, who she seems to care very little about on the trail of a bunch of clues that didn’t mean much. There are flashbacks to her childhood, trigger warning here for child abuse, and snippets from Silvina’s journal, which are meant to give context but I wonder if I missed some subtlety.

I did enjoy the fact that Jane is mostly a regular person who isn’t really cut out to get involved with the kind of dangerous people she encounters. She was once a wrestler, so she’s strong enough, and her job means she knows how to dig, but she doesn’t have connections and when she is attacked, she is actually hurt for longer than a day.

Her trusty handbag is named Shovel Pig, a name intended as an insult by a colleague, she adopts it instead and the handbag gains a kind of personality. I was much more invested in the fate of Shovel Pig than the actual mystery.

At least it was trying to make a point. We are losing species every day, and there’s little we can do in the face of big, corrupt, business. Silvina did her best to rail against her father, but even that wasn’t enough.

First posted at Curiosity Killed the Bookworm.

booklovinalicia's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Part 1 was a slow and confusing start.

Part 2 is where the story finally got me hooked!

Part 3 was good at the start, but the ending got weird.

Read my complete review of this and other books on my blog at www.booklovinalicia.blogspot.com

Thanks to Netgalley and Farrar, Straus and Giroux for allowing me an advanced digital copy to read and give my honest review.

xanadupassenger's review against another edition

Go to review page

Ended up bogged down in details and I was not in the right mood. I want to like Vandermeer, I just struggle to stay focused. Will try again another time. 

kseniap's review against another edition

Go to review page

I wanted to like this book, but I could not finish it. The writing made me mad, the characters made me mad, the plot was disorganized... it was infuriating to read

kaitlynraew's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

pocket_mouse's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging mysterious medium-paced

4.0

blrosene's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A page turner, lots of interesting ideas and I like the narrative voice but it doesn't quite all come together for me.