Scan barcode
literary_kel's review against another edition
emotional
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
colin_s's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
Quote:
“Memories are contrary things; if you quit chasing them and turn your back, they often return on their own.”
Setting:
Blaze takes place in Maine (of course). We visit a few places in Maine but for the majority of the novel the story could take place in just about any part of the US.
Plot:
We follow the main character Clayton Blaisedell Jr. (Blaze), a man with a troubled past who finds himself on his own after his partner George is killed. He attempts to pull of George's final crime to disastrous effect.
Writing:
This book is written like a fairly early Stephen King book, it's not bad but it doesn't have the depth I've come to enjoy in his work.
Characters:
Blaze is a bit of a one note character, while his flash backs give him some depth when it is the present he always acts in about the same way.
Pros:
Very quick read
Tension filled
Cons:
Inspirations are heavy handed
Very quick ending
Recommendation:
If you plan to read all of Stephen Kings works you'll have to read this book and it's not horrible. However if you are only looking for great books then you can skip this one. It's not his best work by a long mile.
“Memories are contrary things; if you quit chasing them and turn your back, they often return on their own.”
Setting:
Blaze takes place in Maine (of course). We visit a few places in Maine but for the majority of the novel the story could take place in just about any part of the US.
Plot:
We follow the main character Clayton Blaisedell Jr. (Blaze), a man with a troubled past who finds himself on his own after his partner George is killed. He attempts to pull of George's final crime to disastrous effect.
Writing:
This book is written like a fairly early Stephen King book, it's not bad but it doesn't have the depth I've come to enjoy in his work.
Characters:
Blaze is a bit of a one note character, while his flash backs give him some depth when it is the present he always acts in about the same way.
Pros:
Very quick read
Tension filled
Cons:
Inspirations are heavy handed
Very quick ending
Recommendation:
If you plan to read all of Stephen Kings works you'll have to read this book and it's not horrible. However if you are only looking for great books then you can skip this one. It's not his best work by a long mile.
book_concierge's review
4.0
Clayton Blaisdell Jr, nicknamed Blaze, is a mentally disabled giant of a man; he’s 6ft 7in and “not quite” 300 lbs. His best – and only current – friend is George; a con man and bad influence on him. It’s George who urges Blaze into the life of crime that he’s living now, who, in fact, teaches Blaze how to live the life. Their dream is that one big score that will let them retire. That’s where the idea of kidnapping a baby comes in. But this will not be the Lindbergh kidnapping; Blaze never hurts anyone (unless provoked and defending himself) and he is not about to hurt a little baby.
The story takes place in “America, not all that long ago.” It’s not specifically post-war America, but there are no cell phones. The plot moves back and forth between the kidnapping caper and Blaze’s childhood. We learn about his alcoholic father who abused him, the orphanage where he grew up, the foster family that misused him, the petty thieves who “befriended” him so they could use his size and basic naiveté to their own purposes.
To King’s credit, he keeps these two plots moving, building tension and explaining the underlying pathology that results in the final tragedy. The language is rough and graphic. The scenes of abuse made me cringe and want to beat the &*%^ # out of those who used their power to create the adult Blaze. Once again, King has created a character who is not necessarily likeable, but who captures the reader’s sympathy.
It’s worthwhile to read the forward by Stephen King who explains this “trunk novel,” which is copyrighted in 2007. When King was first starting out he wrote different genres under different names. He had been very successful in the horror genre with his own name, so he used Richard Bachman for non-horror books from about 1966 to 1973. This was the last book “Bachman” wrote. But THIS book didn’t ever get published. Fast forward to 2005 when King, now an incredibly successful author, comes across this manuscript in a cardboard carton. He looks it over; it’s okay but not great. But he cannot forget this story. His original is too “weepy,” and not hard boiled enough; but, there is a kernel of a good book there. It is not horror; it’s not noir; so what is it? He reworks it, and what we have is a “minor tragedy of the underclass,” a sort of homage to [b:Of Mice and Men|890|Of Mice and Men|John Steinbeck|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1437235233s/890.jpg|40283].
McLarty is nothing short of wonderful as the performer of this audio book. His ability to give life to the various characters through use of different pitch and/or accent is remarkable. I was never confused when two characters had conversations because he gave each a unique voice. Bravo!
The story takes place in “America, not all that long ago.” It’s not specifically post-war America, but there are no cell phones. The plot moves back and forth between the kidnapping caper and Blaze’s childhood. We learn about his alcoholic father who abused him, the orphanage where he grew up, the foster family that misused him, the petty thieves who “befriended” him so they could use his size and basic naiveté to their own purposes.
To King’s credit, he keeps these two plots moving, building tension and explaining the underlying pathology that results in the final tragedy. The language is rough and graphic. The scenes of abuse made me cringe and want to beat the &*%^ # out of those who used their power to create the adult Blaze. Once again, King has created a character who is not necessarily likeable, but who captures the reader’s sympathy.
It’s worthwhile to read the forward by Stephen King who explains this “trunk novel,” which is copyrighted in 2007. When King was first starting out he wrote different genres under different names. He had been very successful in the horror genre with his own name, so he used Richard Bachman for non-horror books from about 1966 to 1973. This was the last book “Bachman” wrote. But THIS book didn’t ever get published. Fast forward to 2005 when King, now an incredibly successful author, comes across this manuscript in a cardboard carton. He looks it over; it’s okay but not great. But he cannot forget this story. His original is too “weepy,” and not hard boiled enough; but, there is a kernel of a good book there. It is not horror; it’s not noir; so what is it? He reworks it, and what we have is a “minor tragedy of the underclass,” a sort of homage to [b:Of Mice and Men|890|Of Mice and Men|John Steinbeck|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1437235233s/890.jpg|40283].
McLarty is nothing short of wonderful as the performer of this audio book. His ability to give life to the various characters through use of different pitch and/or accent is remarkable. I was never confused when two characters had conversations because he gave each a unique voice. Bravo!
hakimbriki's review against another edition
3.0
I will always admire SK's character developping skills. In this very simple yet compelling story, I rediscovered Stephen King's early writing style (which I missed a lot). I would not recommend Blaze for newcomers to the author as I don't think it is quintessential Stephen King but the main character, Blaze, which is SK's answer to Lennie from Of Mice and Man, is so endearing (we're talking about a child kidnapper, mind you) and funny it makes the book unputdownable.
m4riareads's review
3.0
Es más bien un 3.5
Me gustó mucho más conocer sobre el pasado de Blaze que la trama del presente, pero de igual manera fue bastante entretenida la historia.
Es genial empezar el año leyendo un King, así que lo tomo como buen augurio.
Also, me encantó la historia que corta que le agregan al final del libro llamada "Memoria" que según es el previo a lo que se convirtió en Duma Key, libro que aún no he tenido la suerte de leer pero que con este vistazo me dan muchas ganas de hacerlo pronto.
Me gustó mucho más conocer sobre el pasado de Blaze que la trama del presente, pero de igual manera fue bastante entretenida la historia.
Es genial empezar el año leyendo un King, así que lo tomo como buen augurio.
Also, me encantó la historia que corta que le agregan al final del libro llamada "Memoria" que según es el previo a lo que se convirtió en Duma Key, libro que aún no he tenido la suerte de leer pero que con este vistazo me dan muchas ganas de hacerlo pronto.
alexchandler's review
adventurous
dark
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
hannahsbooks101's review against another edition
dark
emotional
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
davehershey's review
dark
emotional
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
4.0
Stephen King - or should we say Richard Bachman - is channeling Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men here. Blaze is a bad guy, but also a sympathetic figure. Overall, perhaps the best of the Bachman books, though it feels different than the 70s-80s Bachman books.