Scan barcode
tessieferro's review against another edition
dark
funny
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
“They all dreamed something about Hasib. Parts of one dream made up for parts missing in another. A little dream filled a gap in a big one, and the threads stitched together to recreate a dream body for Hasib, to go with his soul, which was still hovering over all their heads and seeking the rest it could not find.”
Beautiful, somewhat comical in a twisted way, an unexpected twist on an overused concept. Some parts fell short, but the concept made up for all of it.
Beautiful, somewhat comical in a twisted way, an unexpected twist on an overused concept. Some parts fell short, but the concept made up for all of it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore, Injury/Injury detail, Death, War, and Body horror
roenfoe's review against another edition
dark
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
I wanted to love Frankenstein in Baghdad so, so badly. The blurb was witty, darkly tantalizing, and hinted at an upsetting, modern take on a familiar Western classic. Unfortunately, the actual novel fell very short of my expectations and said summary.
First off, the prose was staccato and largely devoid of flavor. It was difficult to imagine the titular Baghdad, as the luscious descriptions of decaying architecture and its unsettling inhabitants were largely absent. There was a mystery element, but very little intrigue generated. The supernatural elements were not frightening or dark- rather they were discussed in a dry, matter-of-fact way. I read several reviews and papers that classify Frankenstein in Baghdad as a modern Gothic novel, but in my opinion it is severely lacking the crucial Gothic elements to classify it as such. However, after consulting a friend with some expertise, it seems this may have been due to a poor English translation. Over 100 pages were cut from the original text, which likely included some of the meat I felt it lacked.
The characters were one-dimensional and each felt the same as the next. Beyond their initial descriptions, their unique characteristics or personalities were never expounded upon, resulting in a cast of virtually identical men (and a handful of women). The most memorable character was Elishva, and I still had to google her name just now because I couldn't remember. The list of names and roles at the beginning of the book is a necessary tool to understand the story at all. Because these characters all felt the same, I was not invested in any of them and struggled to care about the problems they faced. Even the monster (called Whatsitsname) had the same character voice as the rest of the crew.
It may seem that this book was terrible, but the themes were fascinating: the banality of violence, creation (and the morality of creation), survival in the face of collapse, ritual, religion, and belief, the decay of norms under occupation... I just wish that the author had done something more interesting with them within the story.
I can't remember the ending other than it was underwhelming and gave us no answers. A book doesn't need to do the latter, but after such a drag of a read I was hoping for something good at the end. Part of me thinks I should have DNFed this one, but it was extremely short and I wanted to love it so badly.
First off, the prose was staccato and largely devoid of flavor. It was difficult to imagine the titular Baghdad, as the luscious descriptions of decaying architecture and its unsettling inhabitants were largely absent. There was a mystery element, but very little intrigue generated. The supernatural elements were not frightening or dark- rather they were discussed in a dry, matter-of-fact way. I read several reviews and papers that classify Frankenstein in Baghdad as a modern Gothic novel, but in my opinion it is severely lacking the crucial Gothic elements to classify it as such. However, after consulting a friend with some expertise, it seems this may have been due to a poor English translation. Over 100 pages were cut from the original text, which likely included some of the meat I felt it lacked.
The characters were one-dimensional and each felt the same as the next. Beyond their initial descriptions, their unique characteristics or personalities were never expounded upon, resulting in a cast of virtually identical men (and a handful of women). The most memorable character was Elishva, and I still had to google her name just now because I couldn't remember. The list of names and roles at the beginning of the book is a necessary tool to understand the story at all. Because these characters all felt the same, I was not invested in any of them and struggled to care about the problems they faced. Even the monster (called Whatsitsname) had the same character voice as the rest of the crew.
It may seem that this book was terrible, but the themes were fascinating: the banality of violence, creation (and the morality of creation), survival in the face of collapse, ritual, religion, and belief, the decay of norms under occupation... I just wish that the author had done something more interesting with them within the story.
I can't remember the ending other than it was underwhelming and gave us no answers. A book doesn't need to do the latter, but after such a drag of a read I was hoping for something good at the end. Part of me thinks I should have DNFed this one, but it was extremely short and I wanted to love it so badly.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death
Moderate: Gore
lizlikesfrogs's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
informative
inspiring
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence, War, and Death
Moderate: Police brutality and Alcohol
cviii's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Body horror, Car accident, Violence, War, Classism, Gun violence, Islamophobia, Mass/school shootings, Colonisation, Death, Dementia, Gore, Grief, Murder, Police brutality, Religious bigotry, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Xenophobia and Stalking
annemaries_shelves's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
As a retelling of Frankenstein and its philosophy - who is the monster, what does it mean to be a person and to purse justice, how do you reconcile your past with your future, the balance of nature vs nurture - Frankenstein in Baghdad did a good job.
I can see why people think it's brilliant and how it won awards, but for me personally, it's fine as a novel. Nothing too special in my reading experience.
As with the original, the monster is the most interesting character and we never get enough time with him. There are a lot of tangents and other character povs, which may be annoying to some readers. I enjoyed how all the characters added to the sense of place and time and the exploration of the American invasion of Iraq and subsequent impacts of war on society. However, this detracted from the framing device of the monster - an extra 20-30 pages with the monster's perspective would've been great.
My favourite characters were Hadi (his story and resolution made me so sad) and Elishva, whose enduring love for her long lost/dead son was bittersweet. I do wish there were more female characters pov than just Elishva, who was painted as the "crazy old woman." Mahmoud - my least favourite and most common pov - had a really awful perspective on women and "love" (aka obsession) that was delusional, disrespectful, and all too common among many men. He frustrated and engaged me as a character.
Overall, an interesting and thought-provoking read that probably won't stick with me too long. I'm glad I finally read this off my shelves.
I can see why people think it's brilliant and how it won awards, but for me personally, it's fine as a novel. Nothing too special in my reading experience.
As with the original, the monster is the most interesting character and we never get enough time with him. There are a lot of tangents and other character povs, which may be annoying to some readers. I enjoyed how all the characters added to the sense of place and time and the exploration of the American invasion of Iraq and subsequent impacts of war on society. However, this detracted from the framing device of the monster - an extra 20-30 pages with the monster's perspective would've been great.
My favourite characters were Hadi (his story and resolution made me so sad) and Elishva, whose enduring love for her long lost/dead son was bittersweet. I do wish there were more female characters pov than just Elishva, who was painted as the "crazy old woman." Mahmoud - my least favourite and most common pov - had a really awful perspective on women and "love" (aka obsession) that was delusional, disrespectful, and all too common among many men. He frustrated and engaged me as a character.
Overall, an interesting and thought-provoking read that probably won't stick with me too long. I'm glad I finally read this off my shelves.
Content Warnings
Graphic: War, Gore, Gun violence, Fire/Fire injury, Car accident, Grief, Violence, Blood, Body horror, Death, Torture, Murder, Police brutality, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Sexual harassment
directorpurry's review against another edition
challenging
dark
hopeful
reflective
sad
slow-paced
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Torture, Vomit, Violence, Death, Police brutality, Murder, and War
Moderate: Animal death and Body horror
Minor: Child death and Mass/school shootings
mengzhenreads's review against another edition
challenging
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
I really loved the concept and execution of this book, it was horrifying and thought-provoking and just a great exploration of the logic of violence and vengeance. This was definitely a difficult read but it was absolutely worth it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Violence, and War
Moderate: Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Police brutality, and Torture
Minor: Alcoholism, Blood, and Kidnapping
aegireads's review against another edition
dark
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder, Gore, Death, Grief, War, and Suicide
mme_carton's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism, Alcohol, Alcoholism, Grief, Injury/Injury detail, Mass/school shootings, Misogyny, Police brutality, Sexism, Blood, Body horror, Child death, Death, Death of parent, Gore, Medical content, Gun violence, Murder, Physical abuse, Sexual content, Toxic friendship, Toxic relationship, Violence, War, Sexual assault, Religious bigotry, and Torture
Moderate: Cursing and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Animal cruelty
ryster's review against another edition
4.25
I adored this book! It's well-told, with different, but very interesting perspectives. I didn't care much for the last 20 pages, in which I thought hte book became kind of lost in itself, I see what it was going for, but I just didn't click with that part. Overall though, it was a very enjoyable read, I would definitely recommend it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence and Death
Moderate: Sexual content
Minor: Death of parent