3.66 AVERAGE

reflective fast-paced

I expected to enjoy this more than I did, but this was a miss for me. I really didn’t enjoy it much at all and I don’t feel like it landed for me. I’m sure some people like this type of philosophy but it’s not for me.

I'm struggling with this. It's gonna be a DNF (for now). With so many high ratings I'm curious what I might think at the end, but for now, I'm not feeling it and I want to finish out my reading year with a book that I enjoy from the start.

I'll be back for you!!

Meh.

This was hit or miss. I’d have been better off reading Ecclesiastes.
emotional reflective

Ok. TLDR? Skip the first 40% and the rest is food for thought. Or skip it and check out Adlerian work in another book. The nuggets are SO good, but SO BURIED.

& for people debating the book’s subtitle: it’s self-referential. This book isn’t about a Japanese phenomenon; the book itSELF is the Japanese phenomenon. The book is all about Adlerian psychology and philosophy. So on to the review.

Longer version:

This book has some valuable nuggets and good food for thought but they’re buried in SUPER FUCKING ANNOYING writing with glaring holes, twisting of words, inconsistencies, etc.

The first 40% was…so so so painful to read. Especially since it’s written mostly as a dialogue and seeing the insufferable dialogue was somehow a mix of mind numbing and enraging?! Like holy HECK.

As someone who has had lengthy philosophical discussions and enjoyed them AND had toe-to-toe debates in academic and advocacy settings, this felt like some of the worst—like some of the most circular and annoying philosophical discussions with ignorant and self-important philosophy majors at an Ivy League institution.

There are so many useful and beautiful, holistic tools in Adlerian psychotherapy and this book is just…insufferable. Do yourself a favor and read something else about Adlerian psychology. ORRRRRR skip ahead to like…anything beyond the 40/50% mark of the book. It gets less annoying and more useful after that. In fact, I would say I even enjoyed the book after that mark! It’s less…weirdly prescriptive and the dialogue is less annoying, though it still falls into some traps.

As a whole the book is more descriptive and philosophical than action oriented and practical BUT the practicalities can be pulled out from the content.
hopeful inspiring reflective fast-paced

Absolutely fascinating and would recommend to anyone.
informative inspiring slow-paced

Great message and content. Difficult to read with the entire book being outer dialogue.
informative inspiring reflective medium-paced

While this book didn't 'completely' alter my perspective on life, it enlightened me on points I hadn't fully understood before, especially in terms of understanding human psychology.

I enjoyed reading this book, and it's absolutely worth the read! 📖✨️

Freud is shrieking from the grave