Reviews

The Book of Chameleons by José Eduardo Agualusa

larabizarro's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced

3.0

daed's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Aunque no es un mal libro, tampoco es la gran cosa. Entretenido pero olvidable.

malu's review against another edition

Go to review page

Not in the mood right now.

mar_ianass's review against another edition

Go to review page

relaxing medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

kayforkhrist's review

Go to review page

emotional mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

franciwrites's review

Go to review page

4.0

Rounding up from 3,8.

I think this book deserves a second read, I have the feeling I missed many subtleties. But even so, I can already say that I see why it’s often described as similar to One Hundred Years of Solitude. Not quite as strong but still very enjoyable and full of characters I rarely see in my usual reads.

donnaadouglas's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This novel is weird! Concept, content, resolution, everything! Whilst I liked the idea of a man reincarnated as a gecko narrating the story, it just seemed a bit too objective. You didn't finish the story knowing much about any of the characters, and the strands of the story just didn't knit together well. Disappointing, as the idea was a gem!

wolfteach's review

Go to review page

5.0

Wonderful book.

ferociablejbear's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

nicciobert's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative

3.5