Scan barcode
allieeilla's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
elalpuis1's review against another edition
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Diverse cast of characters? No
3.5
phantomsuitcase's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
seattlesasha's review against another edition
emotional
funny
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
lemongrabb's review against another edition
hopeful
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
jojodoug55's review against another edition
4.0
3.75/5 stars
Absurdly humourous yet realistically grave. Beautiful yet triste. I expected more from the cactus entry, but in a sense it does act as a thread throughout. The use of a desert is an effective allegory for grief. I appreciate the fact that this novel does not speak about typical grief, rather the grief felt before someone passes, the grief concerning what-ifs, the grief of feeling grief too soon, the grief of self. The pacing is superb: it reflects not only the emotions of the protagonist, but it also creates a consistent narrative voice and provides the reader with a sense of intrigue.
Absurdly humourous yet realistically grave. Beautiful yet triste. I expected more from the cactus entry, but in a sense it does act as a thread throughout. The use of a desert is an effective allegory for grief. I appreciate the fact that this novel does not speak about typical grief, rather the grief felt before someone passes, the grief concerning what-ifs, the grief of feeling grief too soon, the grief of self. The pacing is superb: it reflects not only the emotions of the protagonist, but it also creates a consistent narrative voice and provides the reader with a sense of intrigue.
jaedewi's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
kaitlyn_campbell's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
mysterious
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
lit_laugh_luv's review against another edition
2.0
I went into this with high hopes but unfortunately it missed the mark entirely for me. The serious, clairvoyant moments from our narrator are where the book is at its best - there's definitely an importance to highlighting the burnout and anticipatory grief that a lot of caretakers experience. With that said, these musings are far and few between, and the comedic tone of the writing feels so incredibly forced. Without enough contrast between serious and satire, this just feels forced and cringeworthy in its delivery.
The amount of brand references feels so American and out of place - maybe it's just the disconnect I have with the consumerist aspect of American culture? It felt so gimmicky and like an elongated ad campaign for Best Western. The novel itself feels like a short story that was drawn out to a novella without expanding the plot accordingly; it feels repetitive at best, and every minor characters exists as nothing more than comedic relief. If you re-wrote this novel without her husband or his illness, you'd effectively convey the same message and mitigate how trivializing the depiction of chronic illness is. I personally didn't enjoy the ending either - it feels too "safe" in a book that largely takes risks throughout.
With that said, I do want to highlight that I think there is a fair bit of creativity underpinning this story and I think the desert is the perfect setting to convey the theme of survival, loss and mourning. I have mixed feelings on this because I do think Broder is a talented writer and I don't think this is an objectively bad book; it has the usual elements I enjoy in fiction (introspective, surreal, emotional) but the delivery wasn't necessarily for me. I appreciate when authors take risks and flex their creativity - it may result in a book being (somewhat) polarizing, but I think it helps create something more unique and memorable. My personal enjoyment was a two star, but I would say the book is overall closer to a 3 star.
Thanks to NetGalley and Simon & Schuster for the ARC!
The amount of brand references feels so American and out of place - maybe it's just the disconnect I have with the consumerist aspect of American culture? It felt so gimmicky and like an elongated ad campaign for Best Western. The novel itself feels like a short story that was drawn out to a novella without expanding the plot accordingly; it feels repetitive at best, and every minor characters exists as nothing more than comedic relief. If you re-wrote this novel without her husband or his illness, you'd effectively convey the same message and mitigate how trivializing the depiction of chronic illness is. I personally didn't enjoy the ending either - it feels too "safe" in a book that largely takes risks throughout.
With that said, I do want to highlight that I think there is a fair bit of creativity underpinning this story and I think the desert is the perfect setting to convey the theme of survival, loss and mourning. I have mixed feelings on this because I do think Broder is a talented writer and I don't think this is an objectively bad book; it has the usual elements I enjoy in fiction (introspective, surreal, emotional) but the delivery wasn't necessarily for me. I appreciate when authors take risks and flex their creativity - it may result in a book being (somewhat) polarizing, but I think it helps create something more unique and memorable. My personal enjoyment was a two star, but I would say the book is overall closer to a 3 star.
Thanks to NetGalley and Simon & Schuster for the ARC!