Reviews

Saturday by Ian McEwan

egdoyal's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

peterrrrr2's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

kelly_owl's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

beautifully written. makes even a squash game interesting and poetic. not a quick page turner but definitely a smart introspective book that makes you appreciate what true great writing is all about

cherique89's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Saturday isn't a bad novel, but it has one point working against it throughout the book. That is how uninteresting its protagonist appears to be. He's neither interesting nor completely devoid of personality. Eternally ''mellow''...Perhaps McEwan wanted to create a contrast where the protagonist is unable to commit to the many internal dilemma's he has during his day, but it results in not feeling a connection with the protagonist.

His stream of consciousness is very formal, somehow he is the kind of man that almost never uses informal or downright crude language in his thoughts, instead it is always rather poetically elegant. This may sound very pleasing and in the beginning and at certain moments it is, but not when it's overused.

When it comes to the other characters, I found them to be interesting enough, as was the premise of the story.


spookynorvegan's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This is the second piece of McEwan's fiction I have read, the first being 'Atonement', which immediately went onto my favorites list. That being said, I went into this read very eager to love...and was a bit disappointed.
McEwan is a very talented writer, and I really enjoyed the characters portrayed in this piece, but the giant chunks of narrative dedicated to the game of squash (yawn), and now outdated middle eastern politics (exhausting) were awful and a huge chore to get through. Though I personally found it interesting, it should also be noted that a large chunk of this slim novel was also dedicated to and filled with super detailed, technical neurological language and procedures. Those over-dominated, significant portions of the book really bogged down the narrative and soured the entire experience. Finally, without giving away too much, the really tense, conflict build towards the conclusion of the novel that literally had me breathless ended up really disappointing in the ultimate resolution. A total letdown to an entirely underwhelming tome.

mcmatherne's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

5.0

blakeisgreene's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

krnlchrissy's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This is the story of one Saturday in the life of neurosurgeon Henry Perowne. Some exciting things happen. Lots of not-so-exciting things happen. There isn't a whole lot of plot, and really in a book that only encompasses one day how much plot can one expect?

With that said, I also wasn't bored to the point where I wanted to totally abandon the book. I enjoyed the perspective from a neurosurgeon. Probably because I am familiar with all of the terminology, it didn't seem out of place or a jarring use of over-technical terms. But I will say there were a few times I skimmed over most of a paragraph and didn't come out feeling like I'd missed anything.

Normally I'd give this book 2 stars, but this book really is well written and I feel like most things I read nowadays I find entertaining and not all that well-written. So because while I will admit it was at times boring, the prose was still enjoyable to read, I bumped it up to 3 stars

dlsta's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective slow-paced

2.0

leareads_books's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Extremely mixed feelings about this book. First 300 pages was just not something for me last 100 were pretty good