Reviews tagging 'Misogyny'

Fifty Shades of Grey by E.L. James

14 reviews

kpl's review

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sombre_confetti's review

Go to review page

I only got a 100 pages in and had to stop. I don't force myself to read terrible, awful things. 
The writing is juvenile in every way, it's so cliched it's ridiculous. Just because you change the names and descriptions of the characters from your Twilight fanfiction doesn't make it original fiction. There is no plot only sex and not good/hot sex either. The author has no idea what real sex is like. The sex in the book is unrealistic and if it happened in real life would be painful! The female lead acts like a naive, and clueless 16/17 year old not a 21 almost 22 year old is that is going to graduate with a degree in English Literature. She has the emotional depth of a puddle. The male lead is supposed to be well versed in BDSM sex but he has no idea how to have vanilla sex. Sex if done right, even if it's the females first time, should be pleasurable and there should be no blood on the sheets from penetration!

This book is awful! The author is a terrible, juvenile writer. The characters are one dimensional, and it's clear that she did no research into BDSM culture or American culture. There are British-isms all over the place.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

malreads33's review

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

Such bad grammar that it was distracting. The main character says, “Oh my,” as a response over 200 (!!!) times. I looked it up because it was getting so ridiculous. The character development felt inauthentic. The tragic backstory of the MMC was watered-down and glanced over, leaving him just looking like a kinky asshole who doesn’t want to be close to anyone, except he can’t help it because of some random alluring charm of the FMC. Also was deeply disturbed about the fact that child molestation is painted as okay, just because one of the characters found pleasure in being molested as a child. So gross and disturbing. Sigh. Would not recommend and won’t finish the series. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

inkshadows's review

Go to review page

dark emotional funny mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gentleclowntm's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
bold
italic
strikethrough

Heading

quote
  • ul
  1. ol
spoiler

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

orionmerlin's review

Go to review page

dark emotional tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25

Characters – 4/10
Christian Grey and Anastasia Steele are certainly memorable, but not necessarily for the right reasons. Christian is painted as a tortured, enigmatic billionaire with a dark past, but his character depth never evolves beyond repetitive trauma references. Anastasia, on the other hand, feels one-dimensional, often making decisions that contradict her supposed intelligence. Their dynamic lacks natural progression, and the secondary characters—Kate, José, and Elliot—exist more as plot devices than as meaningful additions to the story. I found myself frustrated by the characters rather than invested in their fates.
Atmosphere/Setting – 5/10
The novel’s setting, largely confined to lavish penthouses, offices, and a few trips outside Seattle, felt serviceable but uninspired. The world lacked the rich detail that makes a setting immersive. While some scenes—particularly those in Christian’s “playroom”—were vividly described, they did not build a compelling world outside of the central relationship. The atmosphere aimed for dark sensuality but often felt superficial, lacking the true psychological weight that would have made the themes more impactful.
Writing Style – 3/10
The writing was repetitive, simplistic, and often awkward. The excessive inner monologue, frequent use of clichés, and over-reliance on phrases like “my inner goddess” made it difficult to take the story seriously. Dialogue felt stilted, and the prose lacked polish. While the writing was easy to follow, it lacked the depth and nuance that could have elevated the book beyond its sensational premise.
Plot – 4/10
The story’s pacing was inconsistent, with long stretches of repetitive internal conflict that felt tedious. The central conflict—Christian’s unwillingness to form an emotional bond versus Anastasia’s desire for love—was interesting in theory but became cyclical and frustrating in execution. The tension lacked real stakes, and the narrative relied too heavily on sexual encounters rather than meaningful plot development. The book introduced intriguing themes about control, trauma, and emotional barriers, but it never fully committed to exploring them beyond surface level.
Intrigue – 6/10
Despite its many flaws, the book maintained a level of intrigue. I wanted to see how far the story would push its premise and whether it would evolve into something more profound. The dynamic between Christian and Anastasia, while problematic, had an addictive quality that made it difficult to put the book down. However, much of this intrigue stemmed from curiosity rather than deep emotional investment.
Logic/Relationships – 3/10
The logic behind the relationship was deeply flawed. Christian’s controlling behavior, often excused by his past trauma, lacked genuine emotional depth. Anastasia’s willingness to ignore red flags and dismiss her own discomfort for the sake of being with Christian felt frustratingly inconsistent. The relationship dynamics often romanticized unhealthy power imbalances rather than exploring them in a meaningful way. Many of Anastasia’s reactions to Christian’s actions felt out of character, making the romance feel forced rather than organic.
Enjoyment – 5/10
Despite my many criticisms, I can’t deny that the book had a certain compulsive readability. It was frustrating yet oddly engaging, flawed but undeniably attention-grabbing. I wouldn’t recommend it for its literary merits, but I can understand its appeal as a guilty pleasure or escapist fantasy. However, the problematic relationship dynamics and repetitive writing detracted significantly from my enjoyment. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

hannahparadise's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

annaofjesup's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

meganpbennett's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

After *years* of being told that I couldn't discuss how this book normalizes abuse and is a bad example of BDSM practices, I finally read it. And it's somehow worse than I imaged. 

First things first: Grey is an abuser. He's a bit of a gaslighter as well, but first and foremost, he is an abuser. He gives the BDSM community a bad name, using "but I'm a Dom" to excuse his stalking, controlling, and abusing of women. One of the many examples is that contract, which does nothing but give him an excuse for controlling and abusing her (I can hear it now: "you signed the contract, Anastasia, you're mine for good."). She's very leery of the contract, and sends back her changes, most of which he rejects or otherwise indicates are part and parcel of getting into a relationship with him. 

He shows her his "playroom" without discussion it with her. Just sort of whip out his whips. When she indicates that she doesn't know very much (anything) about it, he tells her to do some research and sends her off. It's very one-sided, and he seems unwilling to accept any concessions from her, even when she says something is hard or soft no. A hard no is not negotiable. 

Within the book, it is very clear that she's not interested in and doesn’t actually want to do this (both the D/s aspects and the B&D aspects), but Grey makers she feels that she has no choice but to accept the contract and the minor concessions he’s made to it. This comes up again and again with aspects of play that she's leery about or uninterested in - such as gagging - but he pushes the topic again and again, attempting to get her to change her mind. 

Aftercare. Aftercare is an important part of any BDSM relationship, and is sometimes considered the most important part of the scene. There is next to no aftercare in the book, and as she doesn't know that it's supposed to be, it never comes up. 

Grey admits that he likes hitting women, that he likes hurting women. She doesn't take him seriously, and believes that he won't hurt her. This is very apparent in his play practices. I'm not going to get into why they are so bad, but they are incredibly unsafe, and very likely to hurt the submissive partner. As in, "send the submissive partner to the hospital" hurt if the Dom is experienced, and "send the submissive partner to the morgue" if the Dom is inexperienced. 

Grey stalks her, something she mentions regularly, but she somehow never realizes that it's a bad thing. She even calls him a stalker, but it's somehow not important that he's stalking her. 

Grey attempts to isolate her from her friends, which is a hallmark of abuse. It makes the victim dependent on the abuser, and keeps the family and friends from figuring out the abuse. His first attempts at isolation are passed off as jealousy, and he uses that jealousy as an excuse to get extra Dommy on her. He gets mad at her when she mentions that she was thinking about visiting her mother, because she hadn't discussed that with him. It's as if he was trying to police her thoughts, as well as her actions. He doesn't like that she interviewed from jobs that weren't at his company, because he wanted her under him thumb, dependent on him for everything, including financially (which is another hallmark of abuse).

When we get Grey's backstory, we learn that he was groomed and abused by a pedophile. A pedophile who is now one of his closest friends. A close family friend took advantage to groom and abuse him. 

This book excuses and romanticizes abuse. It plays into dangerous stereotypes about BDSM, and badly misrepresents the community. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

danger_softie's review

Go to review page

funny tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

0.5

Never ending. Mediocre sex scenes. Literally nothing happens. Took me about 3 months go get through because of sheer procrastination. Go read better erotica on ao3.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings