You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Reviews tagging 'Toxic relationship'

Fifty Shades of Grey by E.L. James

55 reviews

maryboberry's review against another edition

dark medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.5

Read this for a group read with my friends and marked all of the red and yellow flags

The totals were 70 red and 26 yellow and I probably didn't even tag all of them

Content Warnings

krosebooks's review

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I have seen the movies and I was pleasantly surprised that the book was way more intriguing. The characters are more natural and have a better connection in the book. I liked the emails written it gave the book a nice format. The ending was abrupt.

The biggest thing about the book, that I liked, was the characters. They had a better connection in my opinion than the actors in the movie.

Content Warnings

pomegranate_muse's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

Content Warnings

gentleclowntm's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? N/A
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

bold
italic
~~strikethrough~~

Heading

quote

spoiler

Content Warnings

kiratamara's review

Go to review page

emotional funny tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Content Warnings

orionmerlin's review

Go to review page

dark emotional tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25

Characters – 4/10

Christian Grey and Anastasia Steele are certainly memorable, but not necessarily for the right reasons. Christian is painted as a tortured, enigmatic billionaire with a dark past, but his character depth never evolves beyond repetitive trauma references. Anastasia, on the other hand, feels one-dimensional, often making decisions that contradict her supposed intelligence. Their dynamic lacks natural progression, and the secondary characters—Kate, José, and Elliot—exist more as plot devices than as meaningful additions to the story. I found myself frustrated by the characters rather than invested in their fates.

Atmosphere/Setting – 5/10

The novel’s setting, largely confined to lavish penthouses, offices, and a few trips outside Seattle, felt serviceable but uninspired. The world lacked the rich detail that makes a setting immersive. While some scenes—particularly those in Christian’s “playroom”—were vividly described, they did not build a compelling world outside of the central relationship. The atmosphere aimed for dark sensuality but often felt superficial, lacking the true psychological weight that would have made the themes more impactful.

Writing Style – 3/10

The writing was repetitive, simplistic, and often awkward. The excessive inner monologue, frequent use of clichés, and over-reliance on phrases like “my inner goddess” made it difficult to take the story seriously. Dialogue felt stilted, and the prose lacked polish. While the writing was easy to follow, it lacked the depth and nuance that could have elevated the book beyond its sensational premise.

Plot – 4/10

The story’s pacing was inconsistent, with long stretches of repetitive internal conflict that felt tedious. The central conflict—Christian’s unwillingness to form an emotional bond versus Anastasia’s desire for love—was interesting in theory but became cyclical and frustrating in execution. The tension lacked real stakes, and the narrative relied too heavily on sexual encounters rather than meaningful plot development. The book introduced intriguing themes about control, trauma, and emotional barriers, but it never fully committed to exploring them beyond surface level.

Intrigue – 6/10

Despite its many flaws, the book maintained a level of intrigue. I wanted to see how far the story would push its premise and whether it would evolve into something more profound. The dynamic between Christian and Anastasia, while problematic, had an addictive quality that made it difficult to put the book down. However, much of this intrigue stemmed from curiosity rather than deep emotional investment.

Logic/Relationships – 3/10

The logic behind the relationship was deeply flawed. Christian’s controlling behavior, often excused by his past trauma, lacked genuine emotional depth. Anastasia’s willingness to ignore red flags and dismiss her own discomfort for the sake of being with Christian felt frustratingly inconsistent. The relationship dynamics often romanticized unhealthy power imbalances rather than exploring them in a meaningful way. Many of Anastasia’s reactions to Christian’s actions felt out of character, making the romance feel forced rather than organic.

Enjoyment – 5/10

Despite my many criticisms, I can’t deny that the book had a certain compulsive readability. It was frustrating yet oddly engaging, flawed but undeniably attention-grabbing. I wouldn’t recommend it for its literary merits, but I can understand its appeal as a guilty pleasure or escapist fantasy. However, the problematic relationship dynamics and repetitive writing detracted significantly from my enjoyment.

Content Warnings