Reviews

Nine Princes in Amber by Roger Zelazny

mrgeof's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny lighthearted mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

mysterion's review against another edition

Go to review page

Didnt like the writing. Everything was an action after action after action without any thoughts i liked

elizafiedler's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

wouterk's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I was not prepared. I've read Zelazny before and I know he has inspired writers like Gaiman and GRR Martin, but I somehow thought this was going to be Zelazny's take on classical fanatasy with moral clarity and the good guys winning. Boy, was I wrong. I might've been misled by goodreads labelling it as YA and the sweet name of amber, but this was a great and very new experience.

Nine Princes of Amber follows Corwin as he wakes up with memory loss in a hospital. And somehow within 175 pages this ends up in an epic battle to reach and besiege Amber.

What I loved about the writing is the fact that Zelazny uses the amnesia well as a writing tool. Rather than it being a convenience to not go into all kinds of details, it is used for the reader to become invested in the world building. We want to know what's going on and that means that Corwin has to find out that he is named Corwin, why he's in the hospital and later on what Amber is and what the hell is going on. What was also fun is that sometimes Corwin breaks the first wall, like he's telling you, the reader, his story.

But like I said, I was not prepared. This book is gritty and dark and extremely political. It is somehow reminiscent of story beats in A Song of Ice and Fire, with backstabbing and political play to get or gain influence with the throne of amber. Those who lose suffer quite cruel fates and punishments and many relatively innocent people are sacrificed.

Also, I was not prepared for how its time influenced these books. First and foremost, people are continuously smoking. It is like the key activity outside of furthering the plot. Second I was not prepared for the joke referring to the Eichmann trial (very dark, though I can appreciate it). Third, there's some scenes that clearly refer to the culture of liberal consumption of drugs and each other.

All in all, a very interesting read with a large story told in a short book. Curious to contiue.

brendalovesbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The idea for this book was really great. I just wish someone else had written it. I didn't care for Roger Zelazny's writing style, and would love to have read this same story by someone that I consider more skilled at writing.

That's not to say that I won't continue on with the series. I'm interested enough to go on, but probably won't be in any hurry to do so.

syn_06's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.0

I'm a huge sci Fi and fantasy fan. I've seen a lot of online chatter about how unserious the Hugos have gotten recently and decided to check out some past Hugo winners for comparison.

and wow....this is objectively not a good book. The writing style is all over the place. There's typos and bad grammar. Nothing is really explained. The characters aren't developed at all. At no point was I given a reason to care about any of the characters or what was happening. I gave it 1 star because it at least kept my attention enough to finish. But I'm not sure why this is such a beloved classic

csdaley's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

itsfreelancer's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Great beginning. Short story. Simple and classy

raijhu's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

The world established in these books is very cool, but the writing style is like a hyper little kid trying to tell you about their day without taking a breath. The end result is that it reads more like a list than a story.

joshhall13's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Enjoyable! I didn't realize this book as 50 years old until I finished. That's kind of crazy I thought it was contemporary.