Reviews tagging 'Murder'

Julia by Sandra Newman

11 reviews

greylovesbroccoli's review

Go to review page

dark emotional sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lolsous's review

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

I think this is a good and needed update of 1984. Julia is such a quiet (and flat) character in the original and this book does an excellent job of filling in the blanks, as well as telling it's own interesting story and raising relevant sociaital critique. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

chanimilo's review

Go to review page

challenging dark hopeful reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

risemini's review

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ferranda's review

Go to review page

dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

feeohnaemily's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

berdandy's review

Go to review page

challenging dark medium-paced
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

beetree's review

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

This absolutely lives up to the original. Wow.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lilybear3's review

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

4.75

I was so excited to see this book announced.  I read 1984 right before this so it'd be fresh in my mind and I'm glad I did.  I think someone could read this alone and be okay, but the story, environment, and characters (specifically those we met already) would be bare.  This book does rely on your knowledge of its source material, but I don't think that's a bad thing.  It felt like easter eggs, but it incorporated the original so much.  The book's concept is 1984 through Julia's perspective so seeing the timelines line up is really cool.  Incorporating these quotes and moments is seamless, like they aren't forced.  I loved that we finally got a book that explored Julia's backstory and what she was thinking and going through.  There were a lot of unexpected moments for me and they weren't always climatic, but they were interesting and added depth.  CW:  descriptions of torture and injuries and we obviously know bad things happen so definitely check those content warnings; it was a lot at times, but I've read worse.  I had a lot of thoughts I wanted to share and most of those are hidden because spoilers.

I love the feminist direction of the story.  Obviously, a lot of it hit because we are going through similar things the U.S., like for some, abortion/miscarriage=murder.  There's broader commentary like women are expected to just take the pain and not have access or resources to get care.  Also women being okay with being alone and wanting alone time. 
From my journal entries:  WOMEN AS TOOLS AND COMMODITIES when O'Brien recruits her to help the Thought Police and seduce men to the "private room."
Julia is our
bi/pan heroine.  This quote is so good:  "It was just part of the feminine nature to love and be loved at the drop of a hat, to make a romance of sharing a pair of slippers and putting them on warm from another's feet."
  Upon reading 1984, you think of Winston as kind of intelligent and right for opposing the Party,
but my god you realize he's a dolt AND he never truly loved Julia, he just loved rebellion even though his verbal activism was performative.  I think there’s an interesting mirror in that Winston wants her to blindly follow him while the party makes people blindly follow them.
  Also love that
O'Brien's spiel in Room 101 was stolen by a woman, just to show that he never had an original idea.
  For Julia's character
how much of a feminist she is is ambiguous.  There are times where she is and some times she is not.  It's really up to interpretation.  I think this is realistic in that she has been in the Party for so long that there is internalized misogyny and Party thoughts that she hasn't fully broken away from.  This could be commentary on white woman feminism (or the fact that the author is a white woman).  About halfway through, I wrote:  Still can't tell if she's content seducing men for the Thought Police and wants to be in the Party (genuinely or out of survival) or she doesn't want to do this at all and wants to rebel from within.  It feels like it could be both.


Ending:
I don’t know if I fully understood the ending.  Like I don’t think I got her reaction to seeing big brother and why he was actually some old guy named Humphrey Pease.  And glad Vicky escaped but now she’s caring for Humphrey.  I don’t know if I fully grasp the meaning of the questions being asked to Julia.  They’re the same questions that O’Brien asked Julia and Winston.  Julia is hesitant and says “whatever you think” and the Reynolds writes yes for all of the questions and sort of decides for her, but Julia agrees.  I think this could be because the first time, Winston answers yes for her and she didn’t have a say, but now she does? So the ending is that she escapes London and gets rescued by the Brotherhood or Free Men and pledges to help them in weakening the Party.


The writing is more contemporary, though there are words and sentence structure that feel reminiscent of 1984.  I was so engaged and I couldn't put this book down.  I am personally taking this sequel/different POV as cannon.  1984 is still one of my favorite books of all-time (I even have a tattoo) so this is a great continuation.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

torturedreadersdept's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings