Scan barcode
sfeldmann's review against another edition
The plot really goes everywhere in this book. I tried to read it after DNFing it last year to give it another shot. I just can’t get into it. The atmosphere is great but all the themes and messages of the book are heavy handed and leave little room for the action of the characters and the plot to show the readers of just tell them. The romance isn’t bad either but it is a little bit insta-lovey.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Mental illness
Moderate: Rape, Panic attacks/disorders, Murder, Sexual assault, Sexism, Sexual violence, Adult/minor relationship, Misogyny, and Sexual content
Minor: Alcoholism
cadimy's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
2.25
I get what the author was trying to do with the heavy misogyny and how it affects the MC deeply, so I did appreciate that at times. Unfortunately I had no connection to any of the characters- they fell so flat and there was no chemistry to be found.
Also, little to no backstory on the fairy king?? Why was he hanging around? He was apparently “stuck” on the estate because of the trees and berries everywhere but that doesn’t explain how he escaped to almost steal the MC? She said she saw him all of the time, but how? Not much story building, and the backstory of the north vs south seemed unnecessary other than to sprinkle in some racism for the characters.
I listened to the audiobook on a road trip, and the fact that I finished it gives it 2 stars, maybe 2.5. I was kind of hoping for a dark ending where her love interest was over taken by the fairy king.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual harassment, Misogyny, Sexual content, and Sexual violence
Moderate: Abandonment, Mental illness, Death, Car accident, Bullying, Alcoholism, Alcohol, Racism, Injury/Injury detail, Violence, Panic attacks/disorders, Death of parent, Animal death, and Gaslighting
Minor: Religious bigotry, Suicidal thoughts, and Toxic relationship
writingwithcaitlin's review
challenging
dark
emotional
informative
inspiring
mysterious
reflective
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
“You don’t have to take up a sword.
Survival is bravery, too.”
A Study in Drowning is a story that sets itself apart from other YA Fantasies for its gothic and suspenseful atmosphere as well as for its lyrical prose. This book was marketed as a rivals to lovers dark academia read. While there is romance, be warned that the romance is not the main premise if that is what you seek. However, there is so much more importance to the storyline that makes this book worth the read!
Effy is character that can be relatable to many for her love for stories and belief for fairytales. She really had no choice in whether or not to believe in these fairytale stories and magic given that she has haunted visions of the Fairy King. She finds her comfort in the book Angharad written by her favorite author- Emrys Myrddin. In being a student at the architecture college, she’s determined to prove those who often underestimated her ability wrong.
This story is about the reality of women’s voices being suppressed by men- specifically in the literature world when it relates to this book. The writing is persuasive in the idea that stories that we’ve grown up with and have given us comfort are often the ones that save us.
The romance in the story was pretty minor and I would have liked to see more of it. But I love the idea that Effy and Preston are not people that see eye to eye on things all the time. It makes their relationship more realistic given their unique circumstances and background.
The world building had a ton of potential but I think overall fell flat. The majority of the story took place at Myrddin’s house but the book starts with the mention of a war between the North and South and it’s not really mentioned again. It doesn’t really add anything of importance to the story so had that been taken out, I don’t feel like it would have changed the story. I could see where the tension is needed to add on to Effy and Preston’s history but to say that there’s a “war”- it just didn’t feel like anything was happening to consider it as such. Maybe this will be touched on more in the sequel. (Which I found out about after finishing the book and looking it up on Goodreads)
One of the main things that I found most intriguing was the idea of the Sleepers. So the Sleepers are essentially corpses of very important people in history that are preserved in the Sleeper’s museum and they have magic that is suppose to keep the north at bay but nothing really comes of this. Again, I wonder if this is something that will be prevalent in the sequel but I would have loved for the Sleepers to be incorporated more into this book and be continually built on in the sequel.
Throughout the entirety of my read through, I was going back and forth between a 3 or 4 star rating and I think the stories message along with the writing kept it closer to 4 stars.
Overall, I really enjoyed this read! I do see myself picking up the sequel and I’m interested to see where Reid takes Effy and Preston moving forward. I would also love to read her other works!
Survival is bravery, too.”
A Study in Drowning is a story that sets itself apart from other YA Fantasies for its gothic and suspenseful atmosphere as well as for its lyrical prose. This book was marketed as a rivals to lovers dark academia read. While there is romance, be warned that the romance is not the main premise if that is what you seek. However, there is so much more importance to the storyline that makes this book worth the read!
Effy is character that can be relatable to many for her love for stories and belief for fairytales. She really had no choice in whether or not to believe in these fairytale stories and magic given that she has haunted visions of the Fairy King. She finds her comfort in the book Angharad written by her favorite author- Emrys Myrddin. In being a student at the architecture college, she’s determined to prove those who often underestimated her ability wrong.
This story is about the reality of women’s voices being suppressed by men- specifically in the literature world when it relates to this book. The writing is persuasive in the idea that stories that we’ve grown up with and have given us comfort are often the ones that save us.
The romance in the story was pretty minor and I would have liked to see more of it. But I love the idea that Effy and Preston are not people that see eye to eye on things all the time. It makes their relationship more realistic given their unique circumstances and background.
The world building had a ton of potential but I think overall fell flat. The majority of the story took place at Myrddin’s house but the book starts with the mention of a war between the North and South and it’s not really mentioned again. It doesn’t really add anything of importance to the story so had that been taken out, I don’t feel like it would have changed the story. I could see where the tension is needed to add on to Effy and Preston’s history but to say that there’s a “war”- it just didn’t feel like anything was happening to consider it as such. Maybe this will be touched on more in the sequel. (Which I found out about after finishing the book and looking it up on Goodreads)
One of the main things that I found most intriguing was the idea of the Sleepers. So the Sleepers are essentially corpses of very important people in history that are preserved in the Sleeper’s museum and they have magic that is suppose to keep the north at bay but nothing really comes of this. Again, I wonder if this is something that will be prevalent in the sequel but I would have loved for the Sleepers to be incorporated more into this book and be continually built on in the sequel.
Throughout the entirety of my read through, I was going back and forth between a 3 or 4 star rating and I think the stories message along with the writing kept it closer to 4 stars.
Overall, I really enjoyed this read! I do see myself picking up the sequel and I’m interested to see where Reid takes Effy and Preston moving forward. I would also love to read her other works!
Content Warnings
Moderate: Misogyny, Medical content, and Sexism
Minor: Sexual assault and Violence
codyemma's review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
reflective
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Panic attacks/disorders, Sexism, Sexual assault, Adult/minor relationship, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Gaslighting, and Toxic relationship
ginamiya's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
informative
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Content Warnings
Minor: Sexism, Panic attacks/disorders, Xenophobia, Sexual assault, and Sexual harassment
xerosbeat's review
dark
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
I really appreciated all the water metaphors when tackling trauma and mental illness in the book. I once told my brother than getting on antidepressants was like coming up for air after being submerged and Ava Reid totally captured that and then some.Misogyny, sexism in academia, survivor guilt, sexual assault, plagiarism, so much was tackled in this book. Thoroughly enjoyed it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual harassment, Stalking, and Xenophobia
manaledi's review
dark
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
This successfully hit the line of being dark without being too dark or too creepy (for me). The foreshadowing was fairly heavy in figuring out most of the mini mysteries (but not all). Closer to magical realism than true fantasy in interesting ways.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Bullying, Gaslighting, Sexual harassment, Panic attacks/disorders, Confinement, and Sexism
120read's review against another edition
dark
emotional
hopeful
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Content Warnings
Minor: Misogyny, Sexual assault, Violence, Mental illness, Sexual harassment, Sexism, Panic attacks/disorders, and Racism
emptzuu's review
Nowadays, it seems that getting glowing Goodreads reviews only requires creating a "relatable" character and including a mediocre romance. Reviews often justify five stars with comments like "it was entertaining" or "the vibes were there." Seriously, people?
This book is not dark academia or gothic, despite having a library and a manor. The writing did not convey the atmosphere associated with these genres. The author's flowery and lyrical style clashes with the book's marketing as gothic and dark academia.
It falls in the same category as "Lessons In Chemistry" where the author creates an old-fashioned world just to make social issues seem more significant. This feels like a lazy plot device. The book oversimplifies everything, portraying all men as evil and all women as innocent. Moreover, the author seems to have done little research. The book features cars and passenger trains, land-line phones and coffee, but also typewriters and mimeographs, and women aren't allowed in university. The constant focus on misogyny and sexual assault in a fantasy book feels excessive and unnecessary. Elements like war and racism are there but have no impact on the plot.
Effy is a highly problematic character, displaying overt racism, misandry, and a severe lack of depth. She is depicted as a weak, whiny, and fearful woman who is perpetually passive, often getting dragged around by men. Her character feels reduced to being defined solely by her trauma, which is portrayed without any nuance or complexity. Trauma does not excuse her behavior.
She would say and think the most outrageous and insulting things about Preston's heritage without even knowing him. She was incredibly prejudiced and judgmental. Considering she herself had faced judgment and been called slurs, you'd think she would understand how wrong it is to act the way she did, but she didn't. She never faced any consequences for her behavior. Preston even coddled her. Why are they even together? Why does Preston forgive her for everything she said and did? It feels like a toxic romance to me. The author spends almost the entire book preaching about misogyny, yet the female main character is ultimately saved by the love interest. Sex solves everything.
She was so entitled that she thought she deserved to be in the literature department, despite being unable to provide a coherent, logical, or evidence-based analysis of the works of her favorite author. In fact, she admitted she had never written a formal paper, even though she was in college.
The only thing she could boast about was memorizing lines from her favorite author's works. She also couldn't accept any criticism, which would make her struggle in a literature class. She just wants to do literature because she is obsessed with Myrddin's work.
She is supposed to be more intelligent than most literature students, yet she is struggling academically in architecture. She is on the verge of flunking out but wins a prestigious opportunity to design for a famous author, beating many competitors.
She is the only girl in architecture, solely because she is not allowed in the literature school, which is illogical. Historically, women have studied literature and languages extensively; it is math and sciences that have had lower female participation.
Additionally, the portrayal of architecture as mere doodling is unrealistic.
It's baffling that some readers find this character relatable. I hesitate to imagine what kind of audience appreciates such a portrayal.
I could easily write three pages detailing how bad this book is, but instead, I'll summarize my thoughts. The book is riddled with plot holes, tackles topics poorly, and features one-dimensional characters along with underdeveloped world-building. Despite its gorgeous cover and beautiful title, the book fails to live up to its marketing promises.
This book is not dark academia or gothic, despite having a library and a manor. The writing did not convey the atmosphere associated with these genres. The author's flowery and lyrical style clashes with the book's marketing as gothic and dark academia.
It falls in the same category as "Lessons In Chemistry" where the author creates an old-fashioned world just to make social issues seem more significant. This feels like a lazy plot device. The book oversimplifies everything, portraying all men as evil and all women as innocent. Moreover, the author seems to have done little research. The book features cars and passenger trains, land-line phones and coffee, but also typewriters and mimeographs, and women aren't allowed in university. The constant focus on misogyny and sexual assault in a fantasy book feels excessive and unnecessary. Elements like war and racism are there but have no impact on the plot.
Effy is a highly problematic character, displaying overt racism, misandry, and a severe lack of depth. She is depicted as a weak, whiny, and fearful woman who is perpetually passive, often getting dragged around by men. Her character feels reduced to being defined solely by her trauma, which is portrayed without any nuance or complexity. Trauma does not excuse her behavior.
She would say and think the most outrageous and insulting things about Preston's heritage without even knowing him. She was incredibly prejudiced and judgmental. Considering she herself had faced judgment and been called slurs, you'd think she would understand how wrong it is to act the way she did, but she didn't. She never faced any consequences for her behavior. Preston even coddled her. Why are they even together? Why does Preston forgive her for everything she said and did? It feels like a toxic romance to me. The author spends almost the entire book preaching about misogyny, yet the female main character is ultimately saved by the love interest. Sex solves everything.
She was so entitled that she thought she deserved to be in the literature department, despite being unable to provide a coherent, logical, or evidence-based analysis of the works of her favorite author. In fact, she admitted she had never written a formal paper, even though she was in college.
The only thing she could boast about was memorizing lines from her favorite author's works. She also couldn't accept any criticism, which would make her struggle in a literature class. She just wants to do literature because she is obsessed with Myrddin's work.
She is supposed to be more intelligent than most literature students, yet she is struggling academically in architecture. She is on the verge of flunking out but wins a prestigious opportunity to design for a famous author, beating many competitors.
She is the only girl in architecture, solely because she is not allowed in the literature school, which is illogical. Historically, women have studied literature and languages extensively; it is math and sciences that have had lower female participation.
Additionally, the portrayal of architecture as mere doodling is unrealistic.
It's baffling that some readers find this character relatable. I hesitate to imagine what kind of audience appreciates such a portrayal.
I could easily write three pages detailing how bad this book is, but instead, I'll summarize my thoughts. The book is riddled with plot holes, tackles topics poorly, and features one-dimensional characters along with underdeveloped world-building. Despite its gorgeous cover and beautiful title, the book fails to live up to its marketing promises.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Xenophobia, Sexual assault, Classism, Racism, Sexual harassment, Sexual content, Misogyny, Racial slurs, and Sexism
Minor: War
pinkhyxteria's review
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Violence, Sexism, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Pregnancy, Sexual harassment, and Xenophobia