Reviews tagging 'Suicidal thoughts'

House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski

113 reviews

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

the word "house" is forever twisted for me. oh johnny. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

Truly nothing like it. It's a very interesting read, almost like a critical academic review, complete with annotations and citations. 

The book actively tries make you confused and lost. The narrator is unreliable, the thing being reviewed possibly doesn't exist (even in the fiction of the story,) and the experimental tyle layout often leaves you guessing where you ought to be reading next. This is by design.

In spite of that, I found it well worth the read. I'm sure there areittle Easter eggs I didn't catch in my first read, I'm may pick it up again at another time. 

I don't know that it was entirely successful in doing what it set out to do (or if that could even be possible, bassed on the story within,) but I think that the attempt was worth it in and of itself, which also makes the read worth it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark mysterious sad slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark emotional slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

I hated it :)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

More of an activity book than a novel. It's like a David Lynch film in the sense that there are parts I like, parts I don't like, but my overall enjoyment was elevated by it being something quite unlike anything else I'd seen before. I've just started exploring the community around the book now that I've finished and there are some really interesting interpretations and takeaways.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
adventurous challenging mysterious tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
challenging dark tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: N/A
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

This is a book that young dudes will find profound. I am a grown-ass woman. It is not profound. It is sexist, immature, humorless, and purposefully difficult to read. If you are super into any of the things that it's doing, you might enjoy this book: a traumatized young man coming of age story, a slow burn horror story about an evil house, a philosophical foray into signs and meaning, and a satire on academic writing. But if it's a satire, why is it so humorless?  OK, the scene when the teacher goes to the house to find out why the kids' art is so effed up, and finds them in the midst of blood and screaming? That was funny. 

Of all the things it attempted, I found the slow burn horror story the most interesting. It was seriously unsettling until it became tedious. And in that horror story, I thought the character of the regular-guy brother Tom was well drawn. 

I feel like Jeff Vandermeer's Annihilation trilogy owes a lot to this book, as does the show Lost. It shares some DNA with Blair Witch Project, too. And it owes more than a little to Infinite Jest, what with the footnotes as well as the "what's real and not," and "what is influencing what"?

The horror story, and this book, go on so long that I stopped caring. The women characters are most often treated as sex objects. The character of Karen is slut shamed, objectified, and belittled for her mental health issues and for not wanting her husband to go into the weird part of the house. But he keeps going back beyond reason. Justice for Karen!

I read to the end only because someone I care about asked me to read this book. If not for that, I would have given up long before. It is too much work to read given that none of the elements engaged me. I saw the "aha" it manufactured, and I wasn't impressed. 

My advice is if you're going to read it, just focus on the house story and Johnny's story. Skip the footnotes and many of the weird typographical flourishes. The reason most people find it profound is for the relation between the two stories. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings